EDX Markets plans Asian expansion enabled by additional funding

South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has initiated on-site consultation services for virtual asset businesses to help them comply with the upcoming Virtual Asset User Protection Act (Virtual Asset Act), which is set to be effective in July. This news was reported yesterday by local media outlet News1. Photo by Hunters Race on UnsplashSupporting VASPs in preparation for the Virtual Asset ActThe consultation services offered by the FSS are fundamentally different from the on-site inspections that have been conducted by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).  Until now, the FIU has been conducting on-site inspections to ensure virtual asset service providers (VASPs) have adequate anti-money laundering (AML) systems in place and comply with the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information (the Financial Transaction Information Act). While the FIU has been tasked with conducting inspections, the FSS’s latest on-site consultation services are dedicated to supporting businesses in developing new monitoring systems, which would enable them to prevent unfair transactions ahead of the implementation of the Virtual Asset Act. The FSS has already begun providing consultation services, with the local crypto exchange Upbit being its first client last week. An insider of FSS stated that the schedule for the on-site consultation will be arranged in advance for those seeking the service.  Demand for new FDSDuring a roundtable meeting with VASP CEOs held on Feb. 7, Lee Hyun-deok, the director of the Virtual Asset Regulatory Bureau under the FSS, emphasized the importance of coming up with a new fraud detection system (FDS) specifically designed to block unfair transactions. Most of the current FDSs within local crypto exchanges are focused on AML.  Unlike the Financial Transaction Information Act which mainly focuses on AML, the Virtual Asset Act focuses on punishing unfair trading practices that exploit abnormal price fluctuation or undisclosed information. The FSS recommends that VASPs implement a new system preventing such practices by April, as the Virtual Asset Act’s enactment is just around the corner.  An FSS insider said there is a high chance that VASPs will get the consultation service multiple times on various themes since a lot has to be done before the Act takes effect in July, adding that this consultation is to encourage VASPs to comply with the law rather than to conduct inspections on them. 

Bybit Extends Service Offering to Include LendingDubai-headquartered crypto spot and derivatives trading platform Bybit announced on Tuesday that it has expanded the range of services it offers to now also encompass crypto lending.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashHourly interestIn the announcement which has been published to the platform’s website, the company set out the nature of the Bybit Lending product. “With Bybit Lending, users can deposit their unused cryptocurrencies into Asset Pools, which will be lent out to borrowers,” the service update outlines.Expanding on the features that the new service offering brings with it, the crypto platform outlines that customers will have the ability to accrue interest on an hourly basis. That interest will be calculated at a variable rate, with a variance in the rate depending upon the level of borrowing activity. “In extreme cases where there are no borrowers at all, the interest rate could drop to 0%,” the company clarified.Low risk claimsBybit points out that “loaned assets are kept safe by Bybit’s strict risk management system, enabling you to earn returns with peace of mind.” While this is comforting to hear, it remains to be seen to what extent crypto market participants will take this statement at face value.2022 proved itself to be a graveyard for most of the leading crypto lending firms, and with that, such failures also proved to be a graveyard for the hard earned funds of retail market participants in their hundreds of thousands. Many are dubious about the integrity and sustainability of the crypto lending model, at least at a retail level.Withdrawal restrictionsBybit added that the product facilitates flexible redemptions. However, in an accompanying note, it added that the withdrawal of funds is dependent upon “ the funds in the Asset Pool [not being] fully lent out and you have not exceeded your Daily Withdrawal Limit.”It’s important to note that as many of the failed crypto lenders were getting further and further into difficulty in 2022, they added more arduous withdrawal limits and withdrawal conditions as a mechanism to stem the bleeding that was the outward flow of deposits against a backdrop of a deficit in customer funds held by these platforms.In further marketing of the product on Twitter, the company is claiming that customers can benefit from interest rates of up to 16.46%. While one could take the view that limited promotion of exceptionally high interest rates is harmless, the lesson learned from recent crypto lender failures is that such platforms were offering excessive and unsustainable interest rates as a mechanism to reel in retail deposits, only to later proceed to mismanage those funds.Competing offeringsBybit is not alone in offering this service. While a plethora of lending services exited the market via bankruptcy, exchanges such as OKX and KuCoin have their own variations on lending. OKX extends a loan facility to platform users proportionate to digital assets the user has deposited on the platform. Seychelles-based KuCoin offers a lending service across a broad spectrum of crypto assets.The intent of US based platforms Coinbase and Kraken in this regard has been retarded due to the actions of US regulators. Kraken fell foul of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relative to its staking service and paid a $30 million fine as a consequence. Meanwhile, Coinbase shelved plans to launch lending-based services in September 2021 having been warded off the idea by the SEC.

A United Nations (UN) report published on Monday pointed fingers at USDT for its alleged role in money laundering and scams in Southeast Asia, prompting the stablecoin’s issuer, Tether, to respond.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashFighting backThe stablecoin issuer finds itself under the spotlight once again, facing intense scrutiny over its association with illicit activities, according to the UN report. Responding by way of a blog post, Tether expressed disappointment and pushed back against the accusations. The firm asserted that the report disproportionately focuses on USDT's alleged connection to illicit activities, neglecting to acknowledge the positive impact it has had on developing economies in emerging markets. Collaborating with law enforcementTether defended its position by highlighting its collaborative efforts with global law enforcement agencies, such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the recently onboarded United States Secret Service (USSS). The company expressed disappointment with the UN's assessment and stressed that its monitoring measures surpass those of traditional banking systems, historically implicated in money laundering cases. Having frozen over $300 million in recent months to combat the criminal use of crypto assets, Tether emphasized the traceability of its tokens and its established track record of collaboration with law enforcement. In its blog post, Tether urged the UN to shift the conversation from concentrating solely on risks to discussing how centralized stablecoins like USDT could contribute to the fight against financial crimes. The UN Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC) division responsible for Southeast Asia and the Pacific released the report, specifically highlighting USDT as a significant instrument for money laundering in the region, notably on the Tron blockchain. Tether's response came soon after the release of the UNODC report, where the company emphasized the need for a broader discussion with the UN on addressing financial crimes within blockchain platforms. Tether acknowledged that there are still numerous opportunities to combat financial crimes on blockchain platforms and encouraged the UN to engage with the industry to comprehend and implement contemporary strategies. The company expressed a willingness to collaborate on initiatives aimed at enhancing the understanding of blockchain technology and its potential in fighting financial crime. A perennial controversyTether has been the subject of a perennial controversy inside and outside the crypto space over the years. Its critics have long accused the company of not having the asset backing to reflect the U.S. dollar stablecoins it issues. The issue has been compounded by Tether’s inability to produce fully fledged audits as opposed to attestation reports to verify its holdings. Speaking on the edges of the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, on Tuesday, Howard Lutnick, CEO of leading global financial services firm Cantor Fitzgerald spoke positively about Tether. He said that his firm has held and managed large quantities of Tether’s assets. Lutnick confirmed that “they have the money they say they have.” Off the back of Lutnick’s comments, Nic Carter, partner at venture capital and private equity firm Castle Island Ventures, outlined that Tether’s critics have been proven wrong. Carter wrote: “Tether truthers spent 6 years trying to convince everyone tether would collapse and drag down the industry. it didn't. . . . Not sure anyone has ever been more wrong about anything.”