Korea offers on-site consultation for virtual asset businesses for law compliance

MAS Offers Guidelines for Banks Handling Crypto-Related ClientsThe Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has released a comprehensive set of guidelines to assist banks in managing clients who are involved in digital assets, such as cryptocurrency exchanges or individuals whose wealth is derived from cryptocurrencies.Photo by Meriç Dağlı on UnsplashIndustry working groupAccording to a report in local media source, The Straits Times, these non-mandatory guidelines, developed by an industry working group, aim to provide best practices for financial institutions to address concerns related to money laundering, terrorism financing, and sanctions risks associated with cryptocurrencies.The working group suggests that enhanced due diligence may be necessary for firms closely connected to facilitating crypto transactions. For instance, conducting site visits or walk-throughs of a client’s anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing processes and controls could be required.During the onboarding process, banks should request information documenting the customer’s crypto exposure and the intended usage of the account. Additionally, banks are advised to establish the source of the client’s funds or wealth.To evaluate the regulatory status of a merchant customer’s crypto-related counterparties, especially if they contribute significantly to the merchant’s transactions, banks should conduct thorough assessments.The working group also highlights the use of blockchain screening tools to review the on-chain activity of digital token payment service providers. Regular screening of new and existing wallet addresses owned or controlled by these providers against the sanctions list and designated wallets is also recommended.Comprehensive guidelinesLoretta Yuen, Head of Legal and Compliance at Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp (OCBC), a Singapore-headquartered bank, describes the guidelines as one of the most comprehensive in the world, providing insights into banks’ management of crypto-related money laundering, terrorism financing, and sanctions risks.She believes the guidelines will raise awareness among prospective customers regarding the key risk considerations banks prioritize and enable customers to proactively fulfill banks’ customer due diligence requirements during the onboarding process.Evy Theunis, DBS Bank’s Head of Digital Assets, views the guidelines as a codification of best practices across the industry, aligning with the bank’s existing protocols. United Overseas Bank (UOB) also acknowledges the benefits of the best practice paper, particularly given the diverse range of digital assets with varying levels of risk.Eight participating banksThe working group responsible for developing these guidelines includes representatives from eight banks, MAS, the Commercial Affairs Department, and Big Four audit firm Ernst & Young. Formed in August 2022 under the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism industry partnership (ACIP), the group aims to identify, assess, and mitigate money laundering and terrorism financing risks in Singapore through a collaborative private-public partnership involving the financial sector, regulators, law enforcement agencies, and other government entities.Singapore is vying to establish itself as a hub for digital asset business in Asia, alongside other centers such as Hong Kong. The Chinese autonomous territory has been making greater progress over the course of the past year.However, a report in The Wall Street Journal on Monday suggests that banking remains a difficulty for crypto businesses in Hong Kong. Hong Kong’s difficulty may be Singapore’s opportunity, given the work that this working group has carried out in smoothing the way for the banking of digital asset-related businesses.

Top Korean Crypto Exchanges Witness Surge in Listings and Delistings During H1In the first half of this year, South Korea’s top five cryptocurrency exchanges experienced notable growth in the number of newly added cryptocurrencies to their platforms. However, they also observed a significant surge in the number of cryptocurrencies being delisted.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDelisting and listingAccording to a report by local news outlet Etoday, the nation’s five leading exchanges Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax ceased trading for a total of 51 cryptocurrencies during the first six months of this year. This marked an 88% increase compared to the 27 cryptocurrencies delisted in the previous six-month period. During the first half of last year, the number of delisted tokens was 48.Among the five exchanges, Coinone took the lead by delisting the highest number of cryptocurrencies, totaling 24. Bithumb followed with 14 delisted tokens, Gopax with six, Upbit with five, and Korbit with two. Notably, Coinone continued its delisting spree this month, removing an additional five cryptocurrencies from its platform. Most cryptos were delisted because their projects and services were not operating normally.The significant number of delisted tokens at Coinone appears to be linked to the involvement of its former employees in the unlawful listing of certain tokens. These individuals reportedly received bribes in exchange for listing a total of 46 cryptocurrencies on the trading platform. Among these tokens were PICA and PURE, which are no longer traded on the exchange.Only five cryptocurrencies were delisted according to the decision made by the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), a self-regulatory group consisting of the aforementioned five crypto exchanges. The delisted tokens were REP, BASIC, OMG, SRM, and PCI. This indicates that most of the affected cryptocurrencies were exclusively traded on one of the DAXA member exchanges, indicating that DAXA’s listing and delisting guidelines were largely ineffective.Meanwhile, there has been a notable surge in the number of newly added cryptocurrencies. Bithumb, for instance, took the lead by listing an impressive 63 new tokens, nearly three times the number listed by Upbit (22). In the same vein, Coinone added 14 tokens, while Korbit and Gopax followed with six and three new listings, respectively.Profit squeezeLast year, crypto trading platforms adopted a conservative approach when it came to listing and delisting procedures, prioritizing investor protection. However, their stance shifted as the global crypto market encountered a significant decline in trading volume amid crypto winter. This decrease in trading activity subsequently led to reduced operating profits, compelling the platforms to list more cryptocurrencies.With the exception of Upbit, which maintains a dominant market share in the nation, the outlook on crypto exchanges appears more or less grim. In particular, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax are in the red. Bithumb, while still in profit, saw its operating profit last year falling 80% year-over-year to 163.5 billion KRW ($127.9 million). This trend continued this year, with Bithumb’s operating profit In the first quarter of this year recording 16.2 billion KRW, an 80% decrease compared to the same period last year.In light of this development, an industry insider, who wished to stay anonymous, told Etoday that while the market’s total trading volume is witnessing a considerable decline, Upbit’s dominance is still growing. This individual also noted that the decrease in trading volume and the resulting deficit are exerting pressure on exchanges to expand their cryptocurrency listings.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has outlined that it has established a community initiative relative to its recently launched Project Ensemble tokenization market development effort. 'Project Ensemble Architecture Community'In a press release on May 7, the Hong Kong regulator set out the establishment of the “Project Ensemble Architecture Community.” Project Ensemble was launched two months ago on March 7. At the time, the regulator described the project as “a new wholesale central bank digital currency (wCBDC) project to render support to the development of the tokenisation market in Hong Kong.” The HKMA is trying to create an environment in which it can “develop standards” for the emerging tokenization market, with particular emphasis on the use of a wholesale central bank digital currency (wCBDC). The Chinese autonomous territory’s central bank has launched the “Project Ensemble Architecture Community,” with a view towards supporting interoperability between a wholesale CBDC, tokenized money and tokenized assets. The HKMA has outlined the community's primary objective, stating it aims to provide recommendations on various topics, with initial emphasis on devising a mechanism to facilitate seamless interbank settlement of tokenized deposits through wCBDC for tokenized asset transactions.Photo by Jimmy Chan on PexelsPublic and private sector participantsFurthermore, the working group intends to support the design and execution of Project Ensemble. Notable participants in the "Architecture Community" include the HKMA itself, Hong Kong’s other financial regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), the BIS Innovation Hub Hong Kong Centre, the CBDC Expert Group and seven private sector entities.  Among these are Bank of China (Hong Kong), Hang Seng Bank, HSBC, Standard Chartered Hong Kong, HashKey Group, Ant Digital Technologies and Microsoft Hong Kong. Hashkey Group owns one of two Hong Kong-regulated cryptocurrency exchanges, HashKey Exchange. It also runs a brokerage, asset manager and tokenization platform, amongst other entities. Ant was recently involved in a tokenized deposit trial with HSBC. Regulatory sandboxOne of the first matters on the agenda for the newly-formed Community is to make recommendations about using a wCBDC for interbank settlement of tokenized deposits. Following that, the project plans to work towards the design and implementation of the Project Ensemble Sandbox which will launch in the coming months. The HKMA has been actively testing its CBDC and commenced the second phase of the e-HKD pilot in March. This phase of the pilot program is slated to extend until mid-2025. The journey towards exploring CBDCs in Hong Kong dates back to 2017, with the authorities intensifying their focus on researching a potential e-HKD in 2021, spanning both wholesale and retail levels. With the participation of key stakeholders from both the public and private sectors, including leading financial institutions and technology firms, the initiative appears to be well-positioned to drive innovation and address the evolving needs of the financial industry in Hong Kong.