Top

Bybit Extends Service Offering to Include Lending

Web3 & Enterprise·May 03, 2023, 1:29 AM

Dubai-headquartered crypto spot and derivatives trading platform Bybit announced on Tuesday that it has expanded the range of services it offers to now also encompass crypto lending.

Photo by Traxer on Unsplash

 

Hourly interest

In the announcement which has been published to the platform’s website, the company set out the nature of the Bybit Lending product. “With Bybit Lending, users can deposit their unused cryptocurrencies into Asset Pools, which will be lent out to borrowers,” the service update outlines.

Expanding on the features that the new service offering brings with it, the crypto platform outlines that customers will have the ability to accrue interest on an hourly basis. That interest will be calculated at a variable rate, with a variance in the rate depending upon the level of borrowing activity. “In extreme cases where there are no borrowers at all, the interest rate could drop to 0%,” the company clarified.

 

Low risk claims

Bybit points out that “loaned assets are kept safe by Bybit’s strict risk management system, enabling you to earn returns with peace of mind.” While this is comforting to hear, it remains to be seen to what extent crypto market participants will take this statement at face value.

2022 proved itself to be a graveyard for most of the leading crypto lending firms, and with that, such failures also proved to be a graveyard for the hard earned funds of retail market participants in their hundreds of thousands. Many are dubious about the integrity and sustainability of the crypto lending model, at least at a retail level.

 

Withdrawal restrictions

Bybit added that the product facilitates flexible redemptions. However, in an accompanying note, it added that the withdrawal of funds is dependent upon “ the funds in the Asset Pool [not being] fully lent out and you have not exceeded your Daily Withdrawal Limit.”

It’s important to note that as many of the failed crypto lenders were getting further and further into difficulty in 2022, they added more arduous withdrawal limits and withdrawal conditions as a mechanism to stem the bleeding that was the outward flow of deposits against a backdrop of a deficit in customer funds held by these platforms.

In further marketing of the product on Twitter, the company is claiming that customers can benefit from interest rates of up to 16.46%. While one could take the view that limited promotion of exceptionally high interest rates is harmless, the lesson learned from recent crypto lender failures is that such platforms were offering excessive and unsustainable interest rates as a mechanism to reel in retail deposits, only to later proceed to mismanage those funds.

 

Competing offerings

Bybit is not alone in offering this service. While a plethora of lending services exited the market via bankruptcy, exchanges such as OKX and KuCoin have their own variations on lending. OKX extends a loan facility to platform users proportionate to digital assets the user has deposited on the platform. Seychelles-based KuCoin offers a lending service across a broad spectrum of crypto assets.

The intent of US based platforms Coinbase and Kraken in this regard has been retarded due to the actions of US regulators. Kraken fell foul of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relative to its staking service and paid a $30 million fine as a consequence. Meanwhile, Coinbase shelved plans to launch lending-based services in September 2021 having been warded off the idea by the SEC.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 03, 2024

HKMA incentivizes tokenization in Hong Kong

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the Chinese autonomous territory’s central bank, has launched a scheme which subsidizes projects endeavoring to issue tokenized bonds. Grants of up to $321KThe objective behind the initiative, which was announced in a statement published to the HKMA website on Nov. 28, is to nurture moves towards tokenization within Hong Kong’s capital markets. The initiative, titled the Digital Bond Grant Scheme (DBGS), can be accessed by financial services firms for up to two digital bond issuances. The grant may cover up to 50% of what the HKMA describes as “Eligible Expenses” incurred in the process of issuing and establishing the digital bond. A maximum grant level of HK$2.5 million ($321,000) has been established. Digital bond issuers are entitled to the full grant where both basic requirements and additional requirements have been met. A half grant of up to HK$1.25 million ($160,600) has been established for those issuers who have met the basic requirements. The scheme has been opened to applicants from Nov. 28 onwards, with it having been set out to run for an initial period of three years. To fulfill the basic requirements, a bond must be issued in Hong Kong and either be issued on a decentralized ledger technology (DLT) platform, or the project itself must be based in Hong Kong while being involved in the running of a DLT platform.Photo by Fidel Fernando on UnsplashAdditional requirementsThe HKMA has listed four items under additional requirements. These include a need for a digital bond to be issued on a DLT platform run by an entity that is not an associate of the issuer. The bond issuance, whether effected in one instance or in tranches, must account for a value of greater than HK$1 billion ($128.5 million).  The bond must be issued to greater than five investors who are not connected with or associates of the issuer. Finally, the bond must be issued on either the Hong Kong Stock Exchange or a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) licensed and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). Project EvergreenIn 2021, the HKMA launched Project Evergreen, an initiative geared towards exploring how DLT could enhance processes and efficiency within capital markets. On Nov. 28 the HKMA published an update on the project, outlining that since its foundation, tokenization had gained considerable momentum, with $10 billion in tokenized bonds having been issued globally within the last decade. The Hong Kong government carried out two tokenized bond issuances as part of the project. Due to the second issuance being seven times larger than the first one, the HKMA believes that this accounted for institutional investors being attracted to the bond issuance.  In the update, the HKMA outlined that going forward, the plan is to promote wider adoption of what is viable, within the confines of what is possible. The central bank asserted that the DBGS was established on this basis. The update stated: "To fully reap the potential of DLT, we need to keep pushing the boundaries and explore further innovation." In a related development, a report published by the Financial Times on Nov. 28 suggests that the Hong Kong government is considering offering crypto tax breaks to hedge funds and private equity funds.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 22, 2023

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto Risks

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 19, 2023

SEC Seeks to Question Co-Founder of Singapore’s Terraform Labs

SEC Seeks to Question Co-Founder of Singapore’s Terraform LabsThe United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken a step forward in its ongoing case against Singapore’s Terraform Labs by seeking to question Daniel Shin, the Co-Founder of the company.The SEC's intention is to gather evidence related to Chai Corporation, a payments company associated with Terraform and the Terra blockchain. District Judge Jed Rakoff granted the SEC’s request earlier this week, which is part of the regulatory body’s efforts to build a case against Terraform Labs and its Co-Founder, Do Kwon. The decision was based upon a motion originally filed in July.Photo by Bermix Studio on UnsplashRequesting South Korean assistanceThe motion, which was granted on Tuesday, allows the SEC to reach out to South Korea for assistance in questioning Shin and obtaining documents related to Chai Corporation. The regulatory body aims to gain insights into Kwon’s role at Chai, the utilization of the Terra blockchain by Chai, and the disclosures made by Chai regarding its relationship with Terraform.Additionally, the SEC is interested in understanding the reasons behind Chai’s separation from Terraform, as the two companies shared offices and staff until their split in 2020.No opposition filedOn a previous occasion, Kwon unsuccessfully challenged the SEC's attempt to access company records on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction given that Terraform is a Singapore-domiciled company. In June, both Terraform and Kwon attempted unsuccessfully to have the entire action thrown out.On this occasion neither Terraform Labs nor Kwon have opposed the SEC’s motion. In fact, they have even included their own set of questions and document requests. Both the Singaporean firm and its Co-Founder have denied the SEC’s allegations, which were filed earlier this year.The SEC’s lawsuit claims that Terraform’s cryptocurrencies, specifically Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) and Terra ClassicUSD (USTC), were involved in fraudulent activities. The US regulatory body further alleges that Kwon and Terraform falsely promoted the use of the Terra blockchain by Chai for processing and settling transactions.The SEC’s lawsuit also accuses Terraform and Kwon of fabricating transactions involving TerraKRW (KRT), a Korean won-pegged stablecoin, to give the impression that Chai was actively utilizing the Terra blockchain.Collapse falloutTerra, an interconnected crypto ecosystem, faced a collapse in May 2022, resulting in the loss of approximately $40 billion in value and impacting the wider cryptocurrency market. The aftermath of this collapse led to legal actions against individuals associated with Terraform Labs. South Korean prosecutors, for instance, charged Shin with multiple fraud offenses in April, alleging that he had concealed the risks of investing in Terraform’s cryptocurrencies.Kwon’s legal situation is equally complex. He is currently serving a prison sentence in Montenegro for attempting to leave the country using a fake passport. He faces criminal charges in both the United States and South Korea, and both countries have requested his extradition.The ongoing investigation sheds light on the intricate relationships within the Terra ecosystem, having an impact across different jurisdictions. As legal proceedings unfold, the outcome will likely have implications for the regulation and oversight of cryptocurrency and blockchain projects internationally.

news
Loading