Banxa's UK arm makes regulatory strides with FCA approval

How will Binance’s criminal case affect its presence in South Korea?Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has reached a settlement with the U.S. government to pay a fine of more than $4.3 billion after the exchange was accused of anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions violations. Co-founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao also pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions to submit documentation to prevent them from becoming mediums for criminal funding. Binance will thus be withdrawing completely from the U.S.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashNews of this incident has sparked keen interest within the South Korean crypto industry regarding the impact it could have on Binance’s presence and influence in the country.Murky future for Binance as Zhao resignsBinance allegedly failed to report transactions involving criminal entities such as terrorist groups, ransomware perpetrators and money launderers without implementing a system to prevent such crimes. In particular, organizations like the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades — the armed wing of the Palestinian militant group Hamas — as well as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and ISIS were found to have utilized Binance as a channel for their funds. Furthermore, the exchange also facilitated transactions with users in sanctioned territories such as Iran, North Korea and Syria.Zhao has subsequently decided to step down as Binance’s CEO, taking to his X (formerly Twitter) account to state that he believes it is the right move. However, he also emphasized that the U.S. government did not accuse Binance of misappropriating user assets or engaging in market manipulation.Despite this fiasco, some insights have painted Binance’s future in a positive light. JPMorgan, the largest bank in the U.S., stated that the uncertainty surrounding Binance itself would diminish. “For crypto investors, the prospect of settlement would see the elimination of a potential systemic risk emanating from a hypothetical Binance collapse,” the bank said, according to an article published by digital asset news outlet The Block.GOPAX reaffirms partnership with Binance despite concernsGOPAX, a Korean fiat-to-crypto exchange that was acquired by Binance in February, also maintained a rather unexpected positive outlook. The acquisition had been followed by a complicated string of events hindering Binance’s full-fledged expansion in Korea, including delayed approval from the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) to become a virtual asset service provider (VASP) and multiple leadership changes as a result.Investors in GOFi — GOPAX’s decentralized finance (DeFi) service — subsequently responded by filing a lawsuit at the end of June, claiming that financial authorities unjustly delayed the approval. They argued that, by approving the request, the FIU would enable Binance to provide the capital that GOPAX had struggled to gather to pay principal and interest payments on GOFi in the wake of last year’s FTX collapse.However, these circumstances did not sway GOPAX’s decision to work with Binance. “We learned of the news about Binance’s fine through articles from foreign media platforms,” GOPAX said. “Regardless, we are still in a business and technical partnership with the exchange.”Prospects for Binance’s landing in KoreaIn contrast to GOPAX’s seemingly positive outlook, the Korean crypto community has voiced mixed opinions about the effect of this development, especially on Binance’s successful entry into the domestic market.If GOPAX’s VASP approval had been delayed due to concerns about Binance’s suitability as its largest shareholder — incited by the legal risks it posed in the U.S. — the possibility of the approval going through may be more plausible as some of these risks have since been alleviated, said Yoon Seung-sik, an analyst at Seoul-based research firm Tiger Research.However, Jang Hye-won, an analyst at crypto data research platform Xangle, pointed out that interpretations may differ depending on the reasons behind FIU’s hesitation in approving the GOPAX acquisition. “If the concerns revolved around legal risks, then the path for Binance’s entry into Korea may seem cleared since those risks have been resolved. But if the concerns are about Binance’s capital inflow into the country, then this incident (Binance’s criminal case) will have no effect,” she explained.On the other end of the spectrum, some experts believe that this incident may have negatively affected the GOPAX acquisition. Hwang Suk-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs & Information Security and a member of the ruling People Power Party’s committee for virtual assets, stated, “Since criminal punishment for Zhao and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit are still pending, it’s hard to conclude that legal risks have been completely resolved. Binance paying a fine for money laundering may actually reinforce the FIU’s concerns about legal risks, making the GOPAX acquisition decisively unfavorable.”These statements come after a public opinion survey conducted earlier in June by Cratos, a Korean blockchain-based polling app, revealed that a 64.6% majority of respondents favored approving the GOPAX acquisition.

Indonesia’s Financial Regulator Appoints Hasan Fawzi to Oversee CryptoThe Financial Services Authority (OJK) of Indonesia has chosen Hasan Fawzi, a former executive of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), as the head of fintech and digital assets oversight and innovation.That’s according to a number of reports published in local and regional news outlets on Thursday. Fawzi, who has served as the Director of the Indonesia Bond Pricing Agency (IBPA) since 2008, brings a wealth of experience in the securities pricing sector. Alongside Fawzi, Lodewik Paulus Agusman, previously responsible for the internal audit department at Bank Indonesia, has also been elected as a member of the OJK Board of Commissioners. These appointments were approved by the House of Representatives Commission overseeing banking and finance.Photo by Tom Fisk on PexelsDigital asset oversightFawzi’s role as the Executive Director for the Supervision of Technological Innovation in the Financial Sector, Digital Financial Assets, and Crypto-assets places him in charge of overseeing peer-to-peer lending platforms, cryptocurrencies, and other components of the evolving industry.Indonesia’s stance on cryptocurrencies remains complex and multi-faceted. While the country is striving to launch a state-backed crypto exchange by mid-2023, as announced by Didid Noordiatmoko, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti), recent statements by Bali Governor Wayan Koster suggest a tightening of regulations concerning crypto payments.Governor Koster emphasized that foreign tourists who use cryptocurrencies for payments, violate visa provisions, or engage in unauthorized activities will face strict consequences. The Bali Representative Office of Bank Indonesia reiterated that while cryptocurrencies themselves are legal in Indonesia, their use as a payment instrument is not.The appointment of Hasan Fawzi to OJK demonstrates Indonesia’s strategic efforts to strengthen oversight and foster innovation within the fintech and digital asset sectors. Fawzi’s extensive experience in securities pricing and leadership in the Indonesia Stock Exchange make him a valuable addition to the regulatory landscape. As Indonesia navigates the complexities of cryptocurrency usage, it will be fascinating to observe the evolution of regulations and how the country’s financial authorities shape the future of the industry.Controlled innovationThese recent developments highlight Indonesia’s determination to stay at the forefront of financial technology albeit with efforts to retain strict controls over the rollout of that innovation. The country recognizes the importance of effectively regulating emerging technologies while fostering an environment conducive to innovation. With Fawzi at the helm of fintech and digital assets oversight, the OJK aims to strike a balance that protects investors and consumers while promoting technological advancement.As these appointments await final approval from President Joko Widodo, the financial industry and crypto enthusiasts will closely watch Indonesia’s regulatory landscape. The decisions made in the coming months will shape the future of fintech and crypto in the country. Indonesia’s approach to this dynamic sector serves as a case study for other nations seeking to establish oversight and embrace the potential of digital assets. Their international regulatory peers will be monitoring efforts in Indonesia to bring about effective regulation of the digital assets space.

Singaporean Regulator Proposes Framework for Digital Money UseThe Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has released a White Paper that outlines proposed standards for the use of digital assets. The aim is to establish a common protocol and conditions for the utilization of these assets.While the paper identifies the potential digital assets bring in streamlining transactions and promoting financial inclusion, it also outlines challenges that need to be addressed before digital money can be successfully implemented.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsPurpose Bound Money (PBM)MAS’s White Paper, which was published on Wednesday, provides requirements to protect the use of digital assets as a medium of exchange and offers a technical overview of Purpose Bound Money (PBM). PBM allows the sender of digital money to specify certain conditions such as validity periods or how the money can be spent.The covered digital monies include central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), tokenized bank deposits, and potentially well-regulated stablecoins, excluding digital assets that it considers volatile such as Bitcoin. These digital monies are generally pegged to real-world currencies, commodities, or financial institutions, making them more stable.MAS highlights that PBMs utilize a common protocol compatible with different ledger technologies and forms of money. This protocol enables money to be directed toward a specific purpose without requiring the money itself to be programmed. It functions as a secure two-layered delivery vehicle, with funds held as collateral in a “wrapper” until specific conditions are met for its release.Standardized formatThe standardized format outlined in the White Paper will allow users to access digital money using their preferred wallet provider. By establishing these standards, the prospects for digital money to become a significant component of the future financial and payments landscape are enhanced. Standardization and regulated use of PBMs can unlock economic value, facilitate efficient and inclusive digital transactions, and provide additional consumer protection.One notable application of PBMs is in protecting online payments, such as e-commerce transactions and prepaid packages. With PBMs, advance payments can be securely held until the service is fulfilled, ensuring that the product or service is delivered before funds are released. This benefits both consumers and merchants, assuring consumers of product delivery and allowing merchants to verify payment before delivering.PBMs can also aid businesses in mitigating risks associated with international trade transactions, ensuring secure and efficient payments while reducing the potential for fraud or non-payment.InteroperabilityTo ensure the safety and usability of digital monies, MAS highlights considerations that will impact PBM implementation. Interoperability across different platforms is crucial to avoid fragmentation and excessive fees. The choice of underlying digital currencies also affects usability and value, with CBDCs, tokenized bank liabilities, and stablecoins offering varying levels of guarantees and regulatory oversight. Additionally, privacy, digital readiness, and the impact on users need to be carefully assessed.MAS acknowledges that the regulatory landscape for digital monies is still evolving globally, which may lead to varying regulatory treatment of PBMs across jurisdictions. It believes that policy considerations should be thought through when designing PBM-based solutions, including decisions regarding issuance, distribution, and conditions for use.