Japan orders Apple, Google to remove unregistered crypto exchange apps

Ripple Receives In-Principle Approval From Singaporean RegulatorRipple, the blockchain-based payments firm, has obtained in-principle regulatory approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to offer digital asset payments and token products in Singapore.Photo by Dids on PexelsODL service expansionThe approval, announced on Wednesday, will enable Ripple’s subsidiary, Ripple Markets Asia Pacific, to expand its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service. ODL facilitates the seamless transfer of the XRP cryptocurrency across borders without the involvement of traditional banking intermediaries.Ripple had applied for an institutional payment license under Singapore’s Payment Service Act to secure the regulatory green light. In response to the approval, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse praised the MAS for its pragmatic and innovation-driven approach to cryptocurrency-related services.He expressed confidence that Singapore would serve as a prominent gateway for Ripple’s business operations in the Asia Pacific (APAC) region. On Twitter, Garlinghouse wrote: “As a major global financial center, Singapore led the way in taking a pragmatic, innovation-first approach to crypto — we’re incredibly proud @Ripple is one of a handful of firms (<20) to receive in-principle approval for a MAS MPI license for digital payment token services!”Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, explained that the regulatory approval from MAS would enhance Ripple’s ability to support forward-thinking customers who are exploring the potential of blockchain and crypto technologies to create a more inclusive and borderless financial system.Growing APAC presenceRipple’s presence in Singapore has already been growing significantly. In 2022, the company doubled its number of employees at its Asia Pacific headquarters, with Singapore becoming a major hub for ODL transactions. The MAS, recognizing the potential of fintech firms in the digital money services sector, published its Purpose Bound Money (PBM) white paper on Wednesday, proposing standards for such firms operating in Singapore.While Ripple has made progress with regulatory compliance in Singapore, it has faced legal challenges in other jurisdictions. Since December 2020, Ripple’s legal team has been dealing with a lawsuit filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing Ripple of conducting an unregistered securities offering with its XRP token.The case is expected to reach a verdict in the coming months. While the speculation is that the case has gone well for Ripple, it remains to be seen to what extent it can get the upper hand in taking on a cornerstone institution of the US establishment like the SEC.Either way, Ripple is moving to develop on a global basis. It has recently pursued further development in the Middle East via a Dubai expansion. In Hong Kong, it is collaborating with local regulators in trialing the use of its technology relative to real-world asset tokenization.The company has also established partnerships with central banks in Montenegro and Thailand, as well as numerous regional banks and financial institutions worldwide.The regulatory approval from MAS marks a significant milestone for Ripple, expanding its customer reach and positioning the company for further growth in the digital asset payment sector. Digital asset innovation is truly global and as many organizations are demonstrating, just as Ripple is in this instance, innovative curtailment in one region will simply manifest itself as greater development in another.

Newly founded bankruptcy claim trading platform OPNX has provided further details about the entities backing the fledgling startup. Taking to Twitter on Friday, Open Exchange CEO Leslie Lamb outlined a number of venture capital backers, with a mixture of international and Asia-centric firms among them. Global backersLamb’s tweet via the firm’s official Twitter account, together with a similar announcement published to the firm’s website, outlined AppWorks, a leading Taiwanese venture capital firm and startup accelerator, as an investor in the company. Other Asian backers include Hong Kong-based crypto fund, Token Bay Capital and the Hong Kong-based arm of one of China’s largest banks, China Merchant Bank International.With the firm based in Dubai, Middle-Eastern interest is represented through the involvement of Saudi digital asset fund, Tuwaiq Limited. Otherwise, the company lists a number of other international backers, including US equity options exchange MIAX Group, DeFi-focused venture and trading firm Nascent, top tier global venture capital firm Susquehanna and the investment arm of market maker and early stage investor, DRW. Questionable founding teamOnly hours after the disclosure by Open Exchange, DRW reached out to CoinDesk to confirm that it is not an investor in the bankruptcy claims exchange. Nascent and Susquehanna also denied that they are involved. The companies are still being listed by OPNX as backers of the project on its website.The launch of OPNX has been mired in controversy from the outset as its founding team includes the founders of the former crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) which failed spectacularly in 2022. Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the founders of 3AC are now the founders behind OPNX. Before their involvement, OPNX was preceded by Seychelles-based crypto yield platform CoinFLEX. That business also failed during the 2022 crypto bear market. It entered into a restructuring process with the consent of the courts in the Seychelles. Emerging from it is OPNX with the 3AC duo of Zhu and Davies having gotten involved at that point. Industry push-backMany in the crypto space have been highly critical of the development of OPNX on the basis of the involvement of both Zhu and Davies. The duo are being blamed for the collapse of the crypto hedge fund due to mismanagement and the knock on effects the firm’s demise had on other entities within crypto. Many of the series of crypto lenders who failed at a later stage in 2022 had major exposure to the wayward hedge fund.There had been some speculation as to who was backing the new project. Earlier this month, BitMEX co-founder and former CEO Arthur Hayes claimed that the 3AC duo had received substantial funding from Bahrain’s sovereign wealth fund to establish the project. In February, Hayes suggested that the crypto bull market must be starting based on news of Zhu and Davies wanting to launch the OPNX platform.Crypto-focused venture capitalist Michael Arrington also spoke out around that time, stating on Twitter, that 3AC founders successfully raising capital for their latest venture was “the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.”Upon its launch earlier this month, industry commentators quickly declared the project a flop citing a trading volume of $13.64 on its first day of trading. Five days in, OPNX made light of the situation, declaring a win on the basis that it had progressed to $12,398 in trading volume, representing a 90,000% increase in trading.Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) issued an investor and marketplace alert on April 12 stating that while OPNX may be Dubai-based, it is not regulated by VARA and instead operates on an unregulated basis. It warned investors against using any unregulated crypto entity.

The Philippines Forging Crypto Reg. Path US Could Learn FromThe Philippines has demonstrated best practice in operating a sensible regulatory framework relative to cryptocurrency while the United States has erred by engaging in regulation via enforcement while responding after the horse has bolted in relation to a string of crypto company collapses. That’s according to Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph.©Unsplash/C BuezaIn an opinion piece published in Forkcast News on Tuesday, De Guzman lays out his view as to what’s required in terms of regulation, while drawing comparisons between the application of regulation relative to crypto in both jurisdictions.The need for “sensible” regulationDe Guzman believes that the crypto industry’s recent failures are a wake-up call for the whole sector. Losses of billions of dollars affected Celsius Network, BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Genesis, and FTX, and led to Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Signature banks’ collapse in a week. To maintain consumers’ trust, he believes that sensible regulation is necessary for the crypto exchanges dealing with digital assets.The legal compliance expert cites the FTX collapse. FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire was among the largest collapses. FTX pretended to support regulation, but its true nature was an offshore exchange for global clients. Nonetheless, some businesses act on their regulation support by acquiring licenses and complying with central bank audits in the countries of operation.State-level and industry-level regulationThe crypto industry being open to self regulation is one element of the solution, he says. Regulators must proactively protect their consumers from scams and business failures, not just clean up the mess after millions of people have been harmed.Regulatory failuresDe Guzman points the finger at reactionary regulatory action. Regulators filed charges against crypto industry founders after their collapse. Previously, they missed the problems of the largest companies. FTX, based in the Bahamas, was mismanaged, and American regulators only responded after customer issues. Regulations by enforcement, preferred in several countries, wait for failure to happen before taking action. Over-regulation through enforcement pushes platforms offshore, where Wild West-type environments thrive, with clear consequences.Regulators in some countries focus on surface-level questions, like which tokens should be considered securities, while others, like in the Philippines, prioritize execution-level details to protect consumers. Anti-money laundering measures and custody are core issues, with the G-7’s Financial Action Task Force’s Travel Rule likely to be more strictly applied. Active regulation and audits are needed to ensure financial platforms act responsibly with customer deposits. Basic rules need to be put in place through a licensing regime, followed by regulation of market practices like commingling of assets, self-dealing, and trading against customers.The Philippines sensible approach to regulationThe Coins.ph legal guru holds out his home country as exemplary in terms of its approach to regulation. The Philippines’ regulatory regime requires a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license to operate a crypto exchange, as well as additional licenses for other services. The country’s central bank, BSP, directly regulates all crypto exchanges and expands its crypto regulations to adapt to market needs. KYC processes in the Philippines require recognition of valid ID documents from across 82 provinces.Additionally, the BSP expects the industry to cooperate in quarterly audits where they share balance sheet information and disclose digital assets in hot and cold wallets. Regulators in the Philippines are proactive and knowledgeable about the crypto space, which sets a sensible framework based on customer protection.