Crypto.com faces criticism for forcing through 2021 token burn rollback

Tether Critics Point to Previous Chinese Securities BackingUSDT stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT) has long faced persistent scrutiny and criticism due to the lack of transparency surrounding the assets backing their digital currencies. The latest allegations come in the form of a report by Bloomberg on Friday suggesting that the world’s largest stablecoin was once backed by securities issued by Chinese companies.Photo by Manuel Joseph on PexelsNYAG releases documentsThese findings were based on documents made public by the New York Attorney General (NY AG). The documents disclosed that Tether had listed securities issued by China’s state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China as part of its reserves backing the USDT stablecoin.Rumors about USDT’s exposure to Chinese securities have circulated for a number of years. In 2021, a Bloomberg research report revealed that Tether’s reserves reportedly included billions of dollars in short-term loans to China-based companies, as well as a significant loan to the collapsed crypto lender Celsius Network.However, in February 2021, Tether reached a settlement with the NY AG’s office over accusations of providing misleading information about its reserves and losses. To address these concerns, Tether handed over documents such as letters, bank accounts, reserve holdings, and wallet addresses through the law firm Steptoe.Attestation reportTether’s latest attestation report for Q1 2023, released on May 10, offered further details about its reserves. According to the report, Tether’s reserves were valued at $81.8 billion at the end of the quarter, a significant increase from the earlier period of $14.8 billion. These reserves consisted of $53 billion in US Treasuries, $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, and $5.3 billion in loans described as “over-collateralized.”The disclosure of Tether’s previous backing by Chinese securities adds another layer of complexity to the stablecoin landscape, raising questions about the risk exposure and potential impact on the stability of these digital assets. Using Chinese commercial paper to back a US dollar stablecoin is a risky endeavor.It raises the same issues as we’ve seen with the plethora of crypto lenders that went bankrupt in 2022. In those cases, they were using customer money to speculate and turn a profit. That’s fine when it works but when it goes wrong, it is customers who suffer. In its defense, Tether has stated that it only held A1 rated banking sector Chinese commercial paper in 2022 in state-owned Chinese companies like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp., and Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. It reduced this exposure to zero later that year.With the cryptocurrency community and regulators seeking greater transparency and accountability, the industry is likely to face increased scrutiny and calls for enhanced regulations to ensure the integrity of stablecoin operations moving forward.As regulators continue to assess and navigate the evolving crypto market, it remains to be seen how the industry will address these concerns and establish clearer guidelines for stablecoin issuers to ensure the trust and confidence of market participants.

Bitstamp, regarded as the longest-running cryptocurrency exchange in the business, declared on March 6 that it has obtained in-principle approval for a license to function as a Major Payment Institution (MPI) from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).Photo by Zhu Hongzhi on UnsplashFirst major Euro exchange in SingaporeThis preliminary approval, a precursor to a full-fledged license for operation in Singapore, marks a significant milestone for Bitstamp towards offering digital payment token services within the city-state. According to the exchange's press release, it's the first crypto trading platform with a substantial presence in the European Union (EU) to secure such approval from MAS. The nod from Singapore’s financial regulator arrives amidst notable regulatory strides in the crypto domain, including the European Union’s rollout of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework and the green light given by the U.S. for Bitcoin ETFs. Focusing on AsiaBitstamp's strategic focus on the Asia Pacific region, with Singapore as its central hub, underscores its focus in delivering services to both institutional and retail clientele across the region. The firm’s intent in this regard became clear in August of last year when Bitstamp sought capital funding to enable it to extend the platform’s reach into various markets across Asia. Whilst the company’s origins can  be traced back to Slovenia, it has since developed further ties with Asia. In 2018, the company was acquired by NXMH, a subsidiary of South Korea’s NXC Corporation. The same holding company owns Korean crypto exchange Korbit. Compliance strategyWhile the licensing is quite the achievement, the company already boasts a robust regulatory track record, surpassing the 50-license mark across key markets such as Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, France the United States (with coverage in 40 states including New York, Washington, Texas and Florida) and the United Kingdom. In its press release the company referred to its ever-growing licensing collection, outlining that “compliance and regulation [are] at the heart of all operations.” Leonard Hoh, Bitstamp's APAC General Manager, lauded Singapore's proactive stance in establishing a regulatory framework for crypto exchanges, positioning the city-state as a pivotal player in the digital assets landscape. Singapore has already granted full licenses to several crypto service providers, including Blockchain.com, Circle, Coinbase and Ripple. In late 2023, Bitstamp initiated talks with three major European banks regarding the potential introduction of cryptocurrency services in 2024. This signals a broader trend within the EU, where the crypto regulatory initiative, MiCA, is smoothing the path for traditional financial institutions to venture into the digital assets realm. Robert Zagotta, Bitstamp’s Chief Commercial Officer, highlighted the surge in interest surrounding its “Bitstamp-as-a-Service” offering, especially within European circles. This service furnishes a white-label licensing framework, coupled with requisite technology, to aid banks and fintech entities in facilitating cryptocurrency transactions for their clientele. However, the regulatory landscape isn't as welcoming in India, where the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) urged the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to block the URLs of nine major global crypto exchanges, including Bitstamp, in late 2023. 

28 crypto service providers register with India’s FIUIn India, 28 entities providing services related to virtual digital assets (VDAs) have successfully registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the body responsible for combating money laundering in the world’s most populous country.Notable names in this list include Neblio Technologies, more commonly known as CoinDCX, Zanmai Labs, the company responsible for the WazirX crypto platform, Bitcipher Labs’ CoinSwitch, Nextgendev Solutions and Awlencan Innovations India’s Zebpay.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashA need to register as ‘reporting entities’This information comes in response to a question posed in the Lok Sabha (India’s lower house of Parliament), where the government emphasized the significance of these entities complying with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In March, the government had formally designated companies dealing in VDAs, crypto exchanges and related intermediaries as “reporting entities” under the PMLA.According to the notification, crypto exchanges and their intermediaries are obligated to conduct Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures for their clients and platform users. This includes maintaining KYC details, identity documents, account files and business correspondence records with clients.Offshore exchanges required to registerMinister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary mentioned that the registration process for VDA service providers catering to the Indian market is underway. Non-compliance with these regulations may result in appropriate action under the PMLA. It has been clarified that offshore crypto exchanges operating in India are required to adhere to these guidelines. Despite that, none of the 28 entities who have registered so far appear to be offshore companies.Commenting on the development via the X social media platform, Sumit Gupta, Co-Founder of CoinDCX, wrote:”Emphasizing compliance to PMLA is vital for the safety and financial integrity of Indians, as dealing with non-registered platforms exposes citizens to nefarious actors, putting their finances at risk.” . . . “It’s encouraging to witness the Government initiating actions against non-compliant offshore entities.”While steps to provide guidelines for the industry are largely positive, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been vocal in its criticism of cryptocurrencies and calls for potential bans have cast a shadow over the industry in India. The recent collapse of prominent platforms like FTX have not been helpful, only serving to exacerbate concerns relative to India’s crypto ecosystem.The negative sentiment, coupled with an ongoing funding winter, has resulted in the closure of operations for some crypto platforms, including Pillow and WeTrade, this year. Firms like CoinSwitch and Gupta’s CoinDCX have had to reduce headcount in 2023 amid challenging market conditions.Despite these challenges, there are also positive signs. A recent report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis found that India has been the frontrunner more recently in terms of crypto adoption in Asia.This latest development provides guidelines where anti-money laundering processes are concerned for crypto firms in India. However, the government needs to follow through with a complete regulatory framework for the industry. The Indian courts recently declined to act on such a petition on the basis that it falls within the remit of the country’s legislature and is outside the purview of the courts.