Taiwan police uncover $320M crypto money laundering operation

Chinese Prosecutors Issue Warning on NFTsIn recent days, China’s top procuratorial agency, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China, issued a warning alongside some guidelines on non-fungible tokens (NFTs).The Supreme People’s Procuratorate is the highest office in China charged with the mandate of upholding legal integrity, safeguarding citizens’ rights, and where necessary, conducting criminal investigations. In a statement published on Monday, the agency set out an advisory, together with additional recommendations, pertaining to NFTs.Photo by Markus Winkler on PexelsNFT status in ChinaWhile all and sundry are aware of a multi-year crack-down by the Chinese authorities on crypto in recent times, exemplified by a ban on crypto trading and the operation of crypto mining facilities within the country’s borders, the status of NFTs has been discussed to a much lesser degree.NFTs remain legal within the country. When the crypto trading ban came into play in 2021, much of the local industry connected with that trading activity disappeared. However, in its place, a newly emergent trend came to the fore in the form of NFTs. With cryptocurrencies perceived as being high risk and sanctioned by the authorities, attention turned to NFTs and there has been a surge of adoption of the digital collectibles within China as a consequence.NFT risksThe procuratorial agency highlighted a number of attributes as well as risks in relation to NFTs in the report that it published. The agency finds the issue of ownership of NFTs as a troublesome one. It cites the fact that NFTs can be replicated and distributed at will on this basis as being particularly problematic. The legitimacy of the right source of the work itself is the decisive factor for the healthy and orderly development of digital works NFT transactions,” it states.It appears that the agency, like many in traditional professional circles before them, have a difficulty recognizing the model of asset ownership that NFTs incorporate. That ownership is not defined by civil law or in accordance with centralized systems but by simply the possession of the requisite private key pertaining to a given NFT within a decentralized system.Blockchain, not cryptoThe agency acknowledged that NFTs do present a novel application of blockchain technology. This is not surprising as while there might be an ongoing clampdown on decentralized cryptocurrencies in China, officials at a national level and in numerous instances within regional administrations, are demonstrating a strategy of leveraging blockchain technology for the betterment of the Chinese economy in the future.Public prosecutor Wang Xia-fen, one of the authors of the report, stated: “It’s widely recognized that digital collectibles have the potential to protect intellectual property rights, boost content creation and enrich the digital economy.” Wang encouraged public prosecutors to “find the distinction between real innovation and criminal activities” where NFTs are concerned.The upshot of its report though, is that the procuratorial agency is uncomfortable with the similarity of many of the attributes of NFTs when compared with decentralized cryptocurrencies. It issued a warning on that basis, emphasizing a need for risk assessment to be carried out and further consideration of the legal risks that are implicated.

Korean Prosecutors Say Do Kwon and His Colleagues Knew Terra Was Unviable from the BeginningKorean prosecutors claimed that Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon and the key members behind the Terra-LUNA crash were aware of the project’s unviability from the beginning, according to a file issued by the Seoul Southern District Court.©Terraform LabsTerraform Labs founders misleading Korean investorsTerraform Labs founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin attracted 280,000 investors in Korea alone, claiming that the Terra stablecoin is a means of transaction, even though the company leaders had been notified by the financial authority that Terra-accepting businesses were impermissible. It is reported that during a search and seizure of the company, Korean prosecutors collected evidence that its employees shared such knowledge on their internal messaging system.Terra’s cross trading on crypto exchangesKnowing their cryptocurrency’s unviability, Terra executives registered its sister token LUNA for listing on major Korean crypto exchanges in May 2019. According to the Korean prosecution, they used a bot to create a trade volume of more than 800 million won in three domestic crypto exchanges by cross trading between 2019 and early last year.Cross trading is illegal in the stock market, as it is considered as an act of price manipulation, but LUNA was traded in crypto exchanges and it hasn’t been determined whether their token is a security or not. Under current Korean law, the court has to accept it as a security to punish those behind the Terra collapse.Shin’s denial of allegationsMeanwhile, Daniel Shin denied the prosecution’s allegations and argued that they had never received such a notice from the financial regulator.

Bitget Exec Speaks to Utility of Enhanced KYCCrypto continues to undergo significant transformation as regulatory authorities across Asia tighten their grip on the industry. In response to these regulatory changes, Seychelles-headquartered Bitget has joined KuCoin and OKX, which have recently bolstered their Know Your Customer (KYC) measures to ensure compliance and safeguard their operations.In a recent interview with Cointelegraph, Bitget Managing Director Gracy Chen spoke to the utility of KYC measures, stating that KYC is useful in filtering out illegitimate users, particularly those engaged in activities such as money laundering.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsMeeting Asian regulatory requirementsThe Seychelles-based exchange with ties to China and Singapore recently announced updates to its KYC protocols. These changes come in the wake of the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) directives, which advise financial institutions, including cryptocurrency exchanges, to implement robust risk management procedures. The MAS has taken a stringent stance, shutting down certain digital payment token service providers to prevent them from facilitating lending and staking activities by retail customers.Starting from October 1, Bitget will require users who have not completed level 1 KYC verification to be restricted from creating new trading orders. This move aims to ensure that users comply with the newly updated guidelines and maintain the integrity of the exchange’s operations.Following industry peersKuCoin and OKX, two other prominent exchanges which, like Bitget, have their corporate headquarters in Seychelles and a strong presence in Asia, have also revamped their KYC policies. While KuCoin initially introduced KYC in 2018, the exchange has strengthened its identity verification procedures, requiring users to upload documents and complete face checks.Furthermore, in July, it announced a mandatory KYC requirement, in line with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. While the mandatory KYC requirement is already in force, the other changes are set to take effect at the end of the month.OKX, on the other hand, has implemented stringent requirements, including the submission of a government-issued ID selfie for users to access all its services. The exchange recently set a deadline for service users to complete KYC.Bitget’s Chen highlighted that its decision to embrace KYC measures was driven by a commitment to serving the market responsibly. She acknowledged that while some users may have reservations about KYC, it is a necessary step to maintain the integrity of the exchange and prevent illicit activities. Speaking at the fringes of the firm’s EmpowerX Summit in Singapore, Chen said:“I’m pretty sure if the user is a financially healthy user, such as, like, if they’re not doing something illegitimate, such as money laundering, they should be pretty comfortable with the KYC process.”Tightening regulationThe tightening of regulations in Asia is not limited to Singapore alone. Japan has also taken steps to enhance anti-money laundering measures related to cryptocurrency transactions, responding to international calls for stricter oversight. Additionally, South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) has announced plans to require companies to disclose details about their cryptocurrency holdings, expected values, and related business models in their financial statements, aligning crypto accounting with conventional financial reporting.These regulatory developments signify a broader trend in the region, with cryptocurrency service providers proactively adapting to the changing landscape. As governments and regulatory authorities take steps to address the potential risks associated with cryptocurrencies, exchanges are prioritizing compliance to ensure their longevity and continued growth.