Huobi Aims for Hong Kong License Within 6–12 Months

At Hong Kong FinTech Week 2025, Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) Chief Executive Julia Leung outlined plans to link Hong Kong’s crypto market with global liquidity. She announced that licensed virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) will be allowed to share a global order book with their overseas counterparts. According to a statement published on the SFC’s website, this step will enable local investors to access international markets more efficiently, improving price discovery and competitiveness. Leung added that more initiatives are on the way to connect local brokers directly to global liquidity networks. This latest connectivity push comes as Hong Kong considers new guardrails for crypto holding companies such as digital asset treasuries (DATs), which hold cryptocurrencies as strategic assets.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashSFC points to regulatory gaps for digital asset treasuriesThe state-owned newspaper Wen Wei Po reported that Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) Chairman Kelvin Wong noted the current lack of regulations governing listed companies operating as DATs and the limited understanding of such entities. Chairman Wong added that firms seeking to list in Hong Kong as DATs would need to persuade both the SFC and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) of their suitability. For companies already listed, he urged investors to remain alert to the potential risks involved. This regulatory concern over crypto investing companies emerges as Hong Kong simultaneously presses ahead with its ambition to become a leading hub for digital finance. City advances on e-HKD and tokenizationIn line with that ambition, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) unveiled its e-HKD Pilot Programme Phase 2 Report in an Oct. 28 press release. The report outlines the potential benefits of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), the e-HKD, and tokenized deposits, noting that public feedback on both concepts has been broadly positive. The program's second phase involved 11 pilot projects led by various consortiums. These projects explored retail use cases, emphasizing the e-HKD’s commercial viability and scalability. Key focus areas included the settlement of tokenized assets, programmability, and offline payments. Participants in the program included Aptos Labs, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Hang Seng Bank, Standard Chartered, and BlackRock. Based on the report's findings, the HKMA stated it would initially prioritize the e-HKD’s application in wholesale or large-value payments, leveraging its credit risk–free nature as a central bank liability. Concurrently, the authority plans to continue studying potential retail and corporate applications, aiming to lay the groundwork for broader implementation by the first half of 2026. Survey shows strong investor appetiteAmong the program’s participants, Aptos Labs, Boston Consulting Group (BCG), and Hang Seng Bank reported accelerating interest in tokenized funds. A survey they conducted found that 61% of retail investors in Hong Kong and mainland China planned to double their exposure. Held between May and June 2025 among more than 500 retail fund investors, the survey tracked sentiment and appetite for tokenized products. Mainland participants showed particularly strong demand for cross-border access. The findings also detailed differing motivations among Hong Kong investors. Active traders expect to lift tokenized fund allocations from 10% to 26%, attracted by round-the-clock trading and greater flexibility. Wealth transfer planners indicated an expected expansion from 5% to 16%, highlighting programmable fund structures for tailored trusts and transparent oversight. Long-term investors aim to raise exposure from 8% to 25%, citing instant liquidity and the ability to use tokenized assets as loan collateral. Mainland investors projected their allocations would climb from 11% to 24%, reportedly viewing tokenized funds as a practical route around capital restrictions. The survey noted that programmable features could support dynamic allocation across Hong Kong products, the onshore use of profits, and smoother cross-border transfers. BCG commented that the survey outcomes align with Hong Kong's measured advance in crypto oversight, pointing to the city’s stablecoin regime that came into force in August. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has signaled, however, that licensing under that regime will not begin until early next year. The ongoing development of the e-HKD and the prospective regulation of digital-asset treasuries point to Hong Kong’s broader strategy of integrating digital finance into its mainstream economy. Together, these initiatives underscore a cautious yet steady effort to position the city as a global center for digital finance. 

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.

Analysts expect crypto market cap to triple or more next yearThe Korbit Research Center, affiliated with South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Korbit, published a report last Friday that provides projections for the crypto market in 2024.The paper includes contributions from its team, notably head of research Peter Chung, as well as research analysts Choy Yoon-young, Kang Dong-hyun and Kim Min-seung.Peter Chung predicts that the total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies could soar to $5 trillion, more than three times greater than its current level of $1.6 trillion. He attributes this potential growth to three key factors: the possibility of the U.S. Federal Reserve easing its monetary policy, the potential approval of spot bitcoin and ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and the anticipated Bitcoin halving event expected in April 2024.Photo by Pierre Borthiry — Peiobty on UnsplashFactors driving crypto market growth in 2024Peter Chung suggests that the growth of the crypto market will be driven by the expanding utility of virtual assets. He believes that once ETFs for bitcoin and ether are approved, these cryptocurrencies will become more versatile as investment options. This, in turn, is expected to enhance their reputation and foster wider adoption, having a significant influence on the broader crypto ecosystem beyond the two most dominant cryptocurrencies.Real-world assets and financial firmsChoy anticipates that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will approve spot bitcoin and ether ETFs by the first half of next year. On a different note, Kang focuses on the importance of blockchain technology, particularly emphasizing real-world assets (RWAs) and roll-up solutions. Kang highlights that since RWAs are closely linked with traditional financial institutions, an influx of capital from these entities is likely to boost the RWA market. This interaction between traditional finance and blockchain technology could be a key driver of growth in the sector.Regulatory changes and landscape shiftKim Min-seung, another analyst from the team, forecasts that upcoming regulatory developments could alter the dynamics of the cryptocurrency market. A notable development in this regard is the forthcoming implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act in South Korea, set for July next year. According to Kim, these changes might result in a scenario where only competitive cryptocurrencies survive.Kim elaborates that the perception of virtual assets is poised for a shift. Currently, crypto investors tend to base their decisions on expectations of arbitrary cryptocurrency inflation. However, once new regulations are implemented, investors are likely to start assessing the actual value of virtual assets more critically. This shift in approach could lead to a more value-driven and stable cryptocurrency market, as speculative tendencies might decrease and a focus on intrinsic value increases.According to local news outlet website The Asia Business Daily, Peter Chung anticipates further growth in the cryptocurrency market next year, following its rebound this year. He suggests that this growth trajectory will not only continue but also attract increased attention from the public.