Top

Terraform Labs Accuses Citadel Securities of Stablecoin Sabotage

Policy & Regulation·October 14, 2023, 12:28 AM

Terraform Labs, the bankrupt Singaporean blockchain firm, is pointing fingers at American market maker Citadel Securities, alleging that it played a role in an orchestrated effort to destabilize Terraform’s TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin back in May 2022.

In its pursuit of justice, Terraform Labs has now called upon the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida to compel Citadel Securities to furnish vital documents concerning their trading activities during that critical period, when the stablecoin underwent a depegging crisis, now referred to as TerraUSD Classic (USTC).

Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

 

Allegations of intentional destabilization

That’s according to a motion filed by Terraform in the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida, earlier this week. As alleged by Terraform Labs, the catastrophic depegging event in May 2022, which saw UST plummet from $1 to a mere $0.02, was not solely due to inherent instability in the algorithm supporting the UST stablecoin. Instead, the firm contends that it was a result of the deliberate and collaborative actions of specific third-party market participants who engaged in “shorting” to trigger the depegging.

Terraform stated in its motion:

“Movant [Terraform] contends that the market destabilization that occurred did not result from instability in the algorithm underlying the UST stablecoin. Instead, Movant contends that the market was destabilized due to the concerted, intentional effort of certain third party market participants to ‘short’ and cause UST to depeg from its one dollar price.”

The motion also alludes to “publicly available evidence” hinting at Citadel’s intention to short the stablecoin at the time of the depegging event. In particular, it references a Discord channel chat screenshot where a pseudonymous trader purportedly had a conversation with Citadel head Ken Griffin. Griffin allegedly remarked:

“They were going to Soros the f*** out of Luna UST,” seemingly drawing a connection to George Soros’ trading strategies, which often involve highly leveraged, one-way bets.

 

Citadel refuted allegations previously

Notably, Citadel Securities has previously refuted allegations of trading the TerraUSD stablecoin in May 2022, according to Forbes.

In its motion, Terraform refers to the importance of these documents for its defense in a lawsuit filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February. The SEC lawsuit alleges that Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, played a significant role in orchestrating a multi-billion dollar cryptocurrency securities fraud.

The motion concludes with Terraform arguing that its defense would be substantially hampered if Citadel Securities were to successfully withhold the requested information. In the event that the court fails to compel Citadel, Terraform has requested that the matter be transferred to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The matter has been the subject of debate within the crypto community in recent months. In May a community member stated:

“As I’ve been saying. People blamed Citadel et al. This was nothing but a rug pull. Wake up. Do Kwon says the dissolving of Terraform Labs in Korea days before the $LUNA and $UST crash is ‘purely coincidental.’”

With the matter now being raised in the courts, it looks like the legal system will be the final adjudicator regarding the issue.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 26, 2023

Korean Financial Authorities to Provide Support for Security Token Market

Korean Financial Authorities to Provide Support for Security Token MarketAmid growing calls for accelerating the growth of the emerging security token (ST) market, the South Korean government is preparing to introduce supportive measures. The security token market is powered by blockchain technology which allows fractional investment in real world assets (RWAs) such as real estate and artwork.Security tokens are digital assets that represent securities generated through a process called security token offering (STO). These tokens, backed by RWAs, can be traded similarly to traditional securities. Investors can use these tokens to obtain shares, voting rights, interest, or profits.Photo by Philip Jang on UnsplashSupport measures for security token IndustryNext month, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) will draw up support measures and policy improvement plans to bolster the nascent security token industry. An FSC representative mentioned that the agency intends to work with the National Assembly to finalize the legislation of security token-related bills by November. Furthermore, the government official said the FSC will actively seek input from industry stakeholders to formulate strategies for enhancing policies designed to promote the growth of the security token market.To align with the national objective titled “The Establishment of Digital Asset Infrastructure and Regulatory Framework,” the FSC revealed regulatory guidelines for security token issuance and distribution in February. These new guidelines are centered around the establishment of institutions responsible for account management and entities engaged in over-the-counter (OTC) trading. Subsequently, in July, lawmaker Yun Chang-hyun, a member of the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee, proposed a bill to amend the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act with the aim of ensuring that these Acts are consistent with the new regulatory guidelines.Security token market’s growth potentialWith growing anticipation that the security token market could rival the size of the exchange-traded fund (ETF) stock market, securities firms, banks, and blockchain companies have been eager to carve out a niche for themselves since the start of the year. However, their progress has been hindered by a potentially extended period of higher interest rates in the US and the slow advancement of security token-related legislation. While these organizations tried to explore opportunities through the financial regulatory sandbox, their endeavors proved more or less fruitless. An official from a securities firm voiced concerns over the escalating costs of setting up security token infrastructure, especially with legislative delays.On this matter, the Korea Financial Investment Association (KOFIA) has emphasized the urgent need to pass security token legislation to clear up regulatory ambiguities. They’ve also called for measures to stimulate market growth, such as relaxing regulations related to token issuance and distribution and increasing investment caps.At a seminar hosted by the Korea Capital Market Institute, Ahn Hyuk, Head of the Platform Division at Korea Investment and Securities, highlighted that the rigorous review of security registration applications by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) might impede the security token market’s growth. Responding to this, Jang Young-shim, Head of the Corporate Disclosure Department at FSS, said that both the FSC and FSS will carefully listen to industry feedback, addressing a range of topics from regulatory relaxation to investor protection.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

May 09, 2023

Dunamu & Partners Invests $109M in 60 Promising Startups

Dunamu & Partners Invests $109M in 60 Promising StartupsInvestment firm Dunamu & Partners (D&P), a subsidiary of South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit’s operator Dunamu, announced that it has made 144.4 billion KRW ($109 million) investments in 60 promising startups, as per economic news media Moneytoday.Photo by Precondo CA on UnsplashDiversified portfolioHaving commenced its operations five years ago, the investment company started investing in fintech and blockchain domains and later diversified its investments into other cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence (AI) and data management.AI and data managementA D&P official said that more than half of the investment (52%) has been allocated towards AI and data management. The company made initial investments in nascent startups and continued to provide additional funds to support their noticeable growth.One of the best cases is Korea Credit Data (KCD), the company behind retail revenue management solution Cashnote. After receiving strategic investment from D&P in 2018, KCD secured another 35 billion KRW ($26.4 million) last October to turn into a unicorn company, elevating its status to a unicorn company — a privately-owned startup valued at over $1 billion.Other notable companies in D&P’s portfolio include cloud-based foreign exchange payment solution Travel Wallet, AI-driven investment tech provider Qraft Technologies, and AI chip design firm Rebellions.Positive social impactD&P has also made investments in areas that generate positive social impact. D&P has committed 10 billion KRW ($7.6 million) each to whole-genome sequencing analysis company Genome Insight and knowledge-sharing platform Classum.Investments with capitalD&P invests entirely with capital and does not rely on funds for financing its investments. D&P CEO Lee Kang-joon emphasized the firm’s preemptive monitoring of market trends and its persistent investment strategy in the quest to identify the next industry trailblazer.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 01, 2023

HKMA reflects on retail CBDC pilot phase one completion

HKMA reflects on retail CBDC pilot phase one completionHong Kong’s Monetary Authority (HKMA), the Chinese territory’s central bank, recently released a report following the completion of phase one of its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot, highlighting the potential benefits of a retail CBDC, commonly referred to as e-HKD (digital Hong Kong dollar).Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashUndecided on full implementationIn a press release published by the HKMA on Monday, the authority clarified that the report underscores that while a retail CBDC could bring value to the payments ecosystem and unlock new economic transaction possibilities, in-depth investigation and evaluation are essential before considering large-scale implementation.At this stage, Hong Kong’s central bank has not committed to introducing an e-HKD, but the report sheds light on the prospects and challenges associated with such a move. The region has been signaling its intent to position itself as a hub for virtual assets, evident in the regulatory framework introduced in June and the granting of licenses to crypto trading platforms in August.Project e-HKD, initiated by the HKMA in 2021, is a significant step toward assessing the feasibility of a digital Hong Kong dollar. The pilot program was launched in November 2022 as part of the HKMA's “Fintech 2025” strategy. However, the HKMA remains cautious, as reflected in the comments of HKMA CEO Eddie Yue earlier this month. Yue told the South China Morning Post that the central bank is still waiting for greater clarity when it comes to the technological, legal and societal aspects of full implementation.Three core attributes identifiedThe report identifies three primary areas where an e-HKD could provide value: programmability, tokenization and atomic settlement. These attributes could lead to faster, more cost-efficient and more inclusive transactions. However, it’s essential to note that the 14 pilot programs conducted with 16 participating firms during phase one were executed on a small scale within a controlled environment.The phase one review highlights that the true potential and prerequisites for implementing an e-HKD on a larger scale depend on market developments and further investigation. It acknowledges that minor issues identified during the pilot phase could become more prominent or even unacceptable in a production environment.Gearing up for phase twoPhase one of the pilot program delved into various aspects, including full-fledged payments, offline payments, tokenized deposits, programmable payments and the settlement of Web3 transactions and tokenized assets. Hong Kong is now gearing up for phase two of the pilot, with plans to explore new use cases for an e-HKD and engage in more focused pilot initiatives. The goal is to understand how the e-HKD can facilitate innovative methods of transacting goods and services while maintaining financial stability.The HKMA’s stance on a retail CBDC places it at the center of a global debate. While the U.S. remains undecided on the issue, with the topic becoming contentious in presidential elections, India has forged ahead with plans for a retail CBDC. Meanwhile, Thailand’s central bank commenced a pilot project for a retail CBDC earlier this year.

news
Loading