Shanghai’s Blockchain Development Plan Paves the Way for Web3 Innovation

Crypto Titans Clash on Elon Musk’s XA subtle panel discussion photo posted by Andrei Grachev of Singapore’s DWF Labs turned into a war of words among crypto trading titans on Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter).Photo by Marek Piwnicki on UnsplashDWF vs GSRGrachev, who is a Managing Partner at the market maker and Web3 investment firm, thanked his fellow panelists in the post. However, the tone quickly soured as Cristian Gil, Co-Founder of rival market-making giant GSR, took offense to Grachev’s presence on the panel and voiced his disapproval on the platform.Gil didn’t mince his words, stating: “[Andrei Grachev] had absolutely no business to be on that panel. It’s insulting to [GSR] , [OKX] and [Wintermute] to be in the same room as [DWF Labs].”DWF vs WintermuteHis remarks received a “Like” from Evgeny Gaevoy, the CEO of market maker Wintermute. In response, Grachev defended his presence, asserting that DWF was superior in technology, trading, and business development compared to its rivals, going so far as to suggest to Gil: “Yeah, if I were you — I would be also crying all the time.”The exchange continued with Grachev claiming that DWF was capturing market share from Wintermute, and Gaevoy responded with a nonchalant “lol,” challenging Grachev to invest more if he believed DWF posed a threat.DWF Labs’ rapid growthWhile the exchange consisted of mere words, it shed light on DWF Labs’ sudden rise to prominence earlier over recent months. The company has featured prominently in an array of investments in Web3 startups and blockchain networks over the course of 2023. Prominent among them have been investments in EOS, the Algorand ecosystem, and the TRON ecosystem.Recently appearing on the BlockBeats podcast, Grachev defended the company, outlining that it was not involved in market manipulation in response to recent assertions to the contrary.“We do not engage in any manipulative behavior,” Grachev stated. “Of course, we have the futures market, which is a tool for hedging positions and trading clubs. We are completely different from directional traders,” he added.Gaevoy added some humor to the mix by sharing a meme, raising questions about the maturity level of these prominent figures in the crypto industry. The spat provoked a broad array of commentary from the crypto community.Crypto immaturityThe very public clash raises concerns about how traditional Wall Street firms, currently making bold moves into the crypto space, might perceive such behavior. Notably, firms like BlackRock have been involved in Bitcoin ETF applications, signaling a growing interest in cryptocurrency among mainstream financial institutions. In response to Gaevoy and Grachev, one commentator wrote: “The institutions are never coming back.”While it would appear that there’s no love lost between DWF, GSR, and Wintermute, it also seems evident that both market makers can agree on Singapore as being an appropriate location from where to operate a crypto business. While Wintermute is London-based, it revealed recently that it was expanding its operations in Singapore. Like Wintermute, GSR is primarily based in London although it too maintains a presence in Singapore to service Asia-centric business.

Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal PropertyAccording to a recent report published by the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, a Chinese court has recognized the legal status of virtual assets, having analyzed their attributes within the framework of Chinese criminal law.The court unequivocally stated that virtual assets are considered legal property under the current legal policy framework and are thus protected by law.The People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China exercise judicial power independently, free from interference by administrative or public organizations. They have responsibility for adjudicating civil, criminal, and administrative cases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashProperty classificationLocal news source Odaily News reported on the development on Friday, indicating that the report, titled “Identification of the Property Attributes of Virtual Currency and Disposal of Property Involved in the Case,” explicitly recognized the economic attributes of virtual assets, leading to their classification as property.This declaration is particularly significant in light of China’s sweeping ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. Despite this ban, the report argues that virtual assets held by individuals should enjoy legal protection within the existing policy framework.Furthermore, the report proposed recommendations for addressing crimes involving virtual assets. It emphasized that in cases where money and property are involved, confiscation should be based on the integration of criminal and civil law. The approach taken aims to strike a balance between safeguarding personal property rights while also addressing broader social and public interests.Contentious approach to cryptoWhile China has been making every effort to promote its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the development of blockchain and metaverse-related technology within the country, its stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies has been contentious at best.Its approach in that respect has been marked by a blanket ban on crypto-related activities such as mining and trading and the prohibition of foreign crypto exchanges from serving customers within mainland China. Nevertheless, Chinese courts have consistently taken a more nuanced view without necessarily contradicting the government’s approach.Differing interpretationsThe divergence between national policy and court rulings first emerged in 2019 when the Hangzhou Internet Court found that Bitcoin is a form of virtual property, and on that basis, it is safeguarded by the law from the point of view of property rights. In May 2022, a Shanghai court affirmed that Bitcoin qualifies as virtual property and, as such, falls under the purview of property rights.Global issueIt’s not just the Chinese courts that are grappling with the issue of clarifying property rights relative to virtual assets. In April of this year, a case in Hong Kong involving defunct crypto exchange Gatecoin resulted in the courts determining that cryptocurrency is property and that on that basis, it’s “capable of being held in trust.”In July a Singaporean court determined that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and on that basis, it should be recognized as property. Earlier this year, the High Court of Justice in London recognized non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as property.The report from the People’s Court reaffirms the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law. This development highlights the ongoing divergence between China’s regulatory policy and the judicial interpretation of virtual assets, signaling a potential evolution in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies.

Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry announced on Friday that it has approved a revision to the Industrial Competitiveness Enhancement Act, with the aim of broadening strategic investment opportunities. According to a local report from crypto publication Coinpost, this move would open avenues for venture capital (VC) firms to invest in projects exclusively issuing cryptocurrencies. Pending parliamentary deliberationWith cabinet approval secured, the revised bill will now undergo introduction and deliberation in the current session of the Diet, Japan's parliament. If passed, the amendment could pave the way for VC funding of Web3 startups in exchange for crypto assets. The Ministry highlighted that the amendment aligns with objectives to foster new businesses and industrial investment, with a particular focus on empowering Japan's economy through support for medium-sized companies and startups. Reports of Japan's intention to ease regulations for VC firms investing in crypto startups first emerged in September.Photo by Manuel Cosentino on UnsplashStablecoin frameworkJapan has further work to do to implement a comprehensive overall framework for digital assets. A move by the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) earlier this month to implement measures designed to guard against unlawful crypto transfers is a case in point. The measure doesn’t appear to account for knock-on effects on the peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions market. However, its stance on crypto regulation is best characterized by efforts to establish a robust legal framework for stablecoins and digital assets. The nation has positioned itself as a global leader in stablecoin regulation, signaling plans to embrace Web3 technologies while maintaining stringent measures to protect users. Japan's stablecoin regulations, while providing clarity, present challenges for issuers, especially regarding profitability in a low-interest rate environment. Compliance with requirements such as maintaining 100% of assets within Japan's trust accounts poses operational hurdles for yen-based stablecoins. Recent developments indicate industry players' efforts to navigate regulatory requirements. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Japan's premier banking conglomerate, has engaged with stablecoin issuers to explore leveraging its blockchain platform. Web3 hope amid economic difficultiesJapan’s economy has seen better days. Last week, the bitcoin-yen trading pair saw bitcoin reach a record high valuation against the yen. New technologies like Web3 are seen as a potential mechanism for the East Asian country to improve its economic performance. In July of last year, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida emphasized the country’s commitment to nurturing the Web3 sector within Japan. Last year, Yudai Suzuki, the founder of a Tokyo-based Web3 incubator, suggested that the country could rediscover its past prowess at the forefront of innovation and technology by embracing blockchain and Web3. Japan's regulatory approach appears to be shifting to accommodate such sectoral growth and development. Last July, the Japan Blockchain Association (JBA) called on the government to address an issue within the Japanese tax code that was hampering the industry. That tax reform was subsequently implemented in December. This latest initiative, too, appears to underscore Japan's commitment to fostering innovation and economic growth through enabling further investment into emerging Web3 enterprises.