Top

Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal Property

Policy & Regulation·September 01, 2023, 11:38 PM

According to a recent report published by the People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China, a Chinese court has recognized the legal status of virtual assets, having analyzed their attributes within the framework of Chinese criminal law.

The court unequivocally stated that virtual assets are considered legal property under the current legal policy framework and are thus protected by law.

The People’s Courts of the People’s Republic of China exercise judicial power independently, free from interference by administrative or public organizations. They have responsibility for adjudicating civil, criminal, and administrative cases.

Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash

 

Property classification

Local news source Odaily News reported on the development on Friday, indicating that the report, titled “Identification of the Property Attributes of Virtual Currency and Disposal of Property Involved in the Case,” explicitly recognized the economic attributes of virtual assets, leading to their classification as property.

This declaration is particularly significant in light of China’s sweeping ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. Despite this ban, the report argues that virtual assets held by individuals should enjoy legal protection within the existing policy framework.

Furthermore, the report proposed recommendations for addressing crimes involving virtual assets. It emphasized that in cases where money and property are involved, confiscation should be based on the integration of criminal and civil law. The approach taken aims to strike a balance between safeguarding personal property rights while also addressing broader social and public interests.

 

Contentious approach to crypto

While China has been making every effort to promote its central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the development of blockchain and metaverse-related technology within the country, its stance on decentralized cryptocurrencies has been contentious at best.

Its approach in that respect has been marked by a blanket ban on crypto-related activities such as mining and trading and the prohibition of foreign crypto exchanges from serving customers within mainland China. Nevertheless, Chinese courts have consistently taken a more nuanced view without necessarily contradicting the government’s approach.

 

Differing interpretations

The divergence between national policy and court rulings first emerged in 2019 when the Hangzhou Internet Court found that Bitcoin is a form of virtual property, and on that basis, it is safeguarded by the law from the point of view of property rights. In May 2022, a Shanghai court affirmed that Bitcoin qualifies as virtual property and, as such, falls under the purview of property rights.

 

Global issue

It’s not just the Chinese courts that are grappling with the issue of clarifying property rights relative to virtual assets. In April of this year, a case in Hong Kong involving defunct crypto exchange Gatecoin resulted in the courts determining that cryptocurrency is property and that on that basis, it’s “capable of being held in trust.”

In July a Singaporean court determined that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and on that basis, it should be recognized as property. Earlier this year, the High Court of Justice in London recognized non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as property.

The report from the People’s Court reaffirms the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law. This development highlights the ongoing divergence between China’s regulatory policy and the judicial interpretation of virtual assets, signaling a potential evolution in the country’s approach to cryptocurrencies.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

May 15, 2023

LG Goes Further Down the Web3 Rabbit Hole with NFT Patent

LG Goes Further Down the Web3 Rabbit Hole with NFT PatentSouth Korean consumer electronics behemoth LG has delved deeper into the Web3 world, this time with a patent filing that would make NFTs more available to TV viewers.Enabling NFTs for the mass marketAccording to the filing, which was made with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the electronics giant is seeking to acquire intellectual property protection on a capability to have a smart TV connect with an NFT market server.That ability would allow the user to then send, receive and display digital artwork. Furthermore, the consumer could complete purchases using an associated digital wallet, relative to NFT-based artwork that they would have the ability to browse through on their LG smart TV.While crypto and Web3 continue to garner a lot of attention, it can still seem sometimes that it exists in a bubble all of its own. Moves like this one from an organization as professional as LG are encouraging, as they demonstrate that LG believes that NFTs are going to be a part of the future, and most importantly, that they’re going to enable mass market participation and adoption.Blade WalletThis is not LG’s first venture into the world of NFTs. Last year, the corporation launched its very own NFT marketplace. Known as “LG Art Labs”, it enables users of US LG TVs that run the WebOS 5.0 operating system, to trade digital collectibles.Earlier this year, the firm launched the Blade Wallet, a third party audited, self-custody digital wallet which runs on the Hedera public ledger. That development has come out of a partnership that LG has developed with the Hedera Hashgraph platform much earlier in 2020. Just as with the Blade Wallet, the LG Art Labs NFT marketplace also runs on Hedera. To support these early stage products, LG itself has been a node operator on the Hedera network since 2020.This recent patent filing references an NFT marketplace and a digital wallet. As we’ve established, the corporation has already launched both of them already. All of that points to the electronics giant executing on a well thought through plan which will bring NFTs to the mass market.Broader interestLG isn’t going to have it all to itself. Samsung, yet another South Korean consumer electronics giant, has also dipped its toe in the water where NFTs are concerned. In January 2022, the company released an NFT marketplace on three of its TV models. That initiative was enabled due to its partnership with leading curated NFT marketplace, Nifty Gateway.Neither will the South Koreans have the consumer electronics-enabled NFT market all to themselves. Japanese consumer electronics conglomerate Sony filed a patent in March that will allow players of Sony products to access interactive Web3 gameplay. That application will be centered upon the use of NFTs also.Sony’s attempts to delve into the Web3 arena have been more recent. In February of this year, Sony Network Communications, its internet provider division, partnered with the project team behind the Astar blockchain in order to create an incubation program for companies who are working on NFT-based innovation and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 16, 2023

New York Bans CoinEx While Seizing Crypto Assets

New York Bans CoinEx While Seizing Crypto AssetsCoinEx, a Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange, has been banned from operating in the US state of New York by Attorney General Letitia James. The ban comes after the exchange allegedly failed to register as a securities and commodities brokerage and falsely represented itself as an exchange.Photo by Jan van der Wolf on Pexels$1.7 million seizureThat’s according to a statement published by the Office of the New York State Attorney General on Thursday. As part of an agreement reached between the parties, over $1.7 million worth of CoinEx’s funds have been seized.Under the terms of the agreement, approximately $1.1 million will be returned to 4,691 investors from New York, and an additional $600,000 will be paid in penalties to the state. To prevent access by New York IP addresses, CoinEx must implement geo-blocking. Moreover, the exchange is forbidden from creating new accounts for customers based in the United States.Trade prohibitionThis recent development resolves a lawsuit filed against CoinEx in February by the New York state. The state accused the exchange of misleading investors and failing to register with local authorities. In accordance with the consent order, CoinEx is now prohibited from offering, selling, or purchasing securities and commodities in New York and cannot make its platform available in the state.James emphasized the consequences for crypto companies that disregard New York’s laws and put investors at risk. The agreement serves as a warning that her office will continue to crack down on such companies. CoinEx users have a 90-day period to recover their crypto funds directly from the exchange.After this period, eligible investors can request fiat currency refunds by emailing coinexrefund@ag.ny.gov. Refunds will be provided in cryptocurrency or cash equivalents held in accounts as of April 25.CoinEx faced a lawsuit in the New York Supreme Court on February 22, where Attorney General James alleged that the exchange engaged in fraudulent practices and violated the state’s Martin Act, known for its strict anti-fraud provisions. The complaint included tokens such as Amp, LBRY Credits (LBC), Rally (RLY), and Terra.Harsh stanceThe banning of CoinEx in New York highlights the regulatory scrutiny surrounding cryptocurrency exchanges and the importance of compliance with local laws and regulations. On the one hand, the enforcement actions taken by authorities aim to protect investors and ensure the integrity of the financial system.However, the state of New York has been particularly harsh in its dealings with crypto companies. As today’s statement reveals, the New York Attorney General has taken action previously against crypto exchange Kucoin, crypto lending platform Nexo, and USDT stablecoin issuer Tether.These actions tie in with the current anti-crypto regulatory pushback that prevails in the United States right now. Other state agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) who last week sued global crypto exchanges Coinbase and Binance, the Federal Reserve, the Department of the Treasury, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), have all conspired to crack down on the industry in the US in recent months.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Mar 13, 2024

Hong Kong regulator unveils stablecoin sandbox

Following December's release of proposed fiat-referenced stablecoin regulations, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has progressed further with the introduction of a stablecoin sandbox.Photo by Nextvoyage on PexelsFormulating a regulatory regimeThe regulatory sandbox, announced through a press release published to the regulator’s website on March 12, encompasses stablecoin currencies beyond the Hong Kong dollar, although the HKMA refrained from specifying particular currencies. Eddie Yue, CEO of the HKMA, emphasized the sandbox's role as a platform for constructive dialogue between the regulatory authority and the industry. Yue stated:"The sandbox arrangement serves as an effective channel for the HKMA and the industry to exchange views on the proposed regulatory regime.”Yue further noted that such engagement is pivotal for formulating regulatory requirements conducive to the sustainable and responsible growth of the stablecoin issuance business. The stablecoin sandbox finds its digital footprint within the International Financial Centre on the HKMA's website. The documentation accompanying the sandbox outlines several key requirements for potential participants. These include demonstrating genuine interest and a feasible plan for issuing fiat-referenced stablecoins in Hong Kong, as well as a concrete strategy for engagement within the sandbox. Additionally, applicants must exhibit a reasonable prospect of compliance with the proposed regulatory framework. Minimum capital requirementsOne notable regulation proposed stipulates that issuers must be Hong Kong-based entities with a minimum capital requirement of HK$25 million ($3.2 million) or 2% of the stablecoin issuance, whichever is higher. The HKMA remains vigilant regarding public announcements by sandbox participants, ensuring that such declarations do not misconstrue endorsement or accreditation from the regulatory authority. In late January, reports suggested discussions between Harvest Global Investment, RD Technologies, Venture Smart Financial Holdings and the HKMA regarding their potential entry into the sandbox. Harvest Global Investment, boasting over $200 billion in assets under management, signifies a significant player in this evolving digital assets space.RD Technologies took to the X social media platform to publicize its approval of the HKMA’s stablecoin sandbox. It also availed of the opportunity to outline that it’s in the process of launching a Hong Kong dollar (HKD)-based stablecoin, which will be known by the short-code HKDR.Hong Kong-based fintech firm AnchorX also chimed in, stating that the sandbox is “a pivotal step forward for the industry, enabling informed dialogue and collaboration between regulators and fintech innovators.” Like RD Technologies, AnchorX is also looking to get involved in the stablecoin business, having developed the AxHKD Hong Kong dollar-based stablecoin, which it is currently beta testing, in collaboration with Conflux Network. Juan Leon, crypto analyst with Bitwise Asset Management, suggested that the move is a great initiative, while calling on the U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to follow Hong Kong’s example. On the tokenization front, Hong Kong made headlines in 2023 with the issuance of the world's largest native digital bond — a green bond exceeding $750 million. Late last year, it also proposed regulations relative to tokenization of real-world assets.Guidance provided to banks on tokenization, coupled with plans for forthcoming legislation, further solidifies Hong Kong's position as a trailblazer in the realm of digital finance.  

news
Loading