Top

Crypto Titans Clash on Elon Musk’s X

Web3 & Enterprise·September 25, 2023, 1:06 AM

A subtle panel discussion photo posted by Andrei Grachev of Singapore’s DWF Labs turned into a war of words among crypto trading titans on Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter).

Photo by Marek Piwnicki on Unsplash

 

DWF vs GSR

Grachev, who is a Managing Partner at the market maker and Web3 investment firm, thanked his fellow panelists in the post. However, the tone quickly soured as Cristian Gil, Co-Founder of rival market-making giant GSR, took offense to Grachev’s presence on the panel and voiced his disapproval on the platform.

Gil didn’t mince his words, stating: “[Andrei Grachev] had absolutely no business to be on that panel. It’s insulting to [GSR] , [OKX] and [Wintermute] to be in the same room as [DWF Labs].”

 

DWF vs Wintermute

His remarks received a “Like” from Evgeny Gaevoy, the CEO of market maker Wintermute. In response, Grachev defended his presence, asserting that DWF was superior in technology, trading, and business development compared to its rivals, going so far as to suggest to Gil: “Yeah, if I were you — I would be also crying all the time.”

The exchange continued with Grachev claiming that DWF was capturing market share from Wintermute, and Gaevoy responded with a nonchalant “lol,” challenging Grachev to invest more if he believed DWF posed a threat.

 

DWF Labs’ rapid growth

While the exchange consisted of mere words, it shed light on DWF Labs’ sudden rise to prominence earlier over recent months. The company has featured prominently in an array of investments in Web3 startups and blockchain networks over the course of 2023. Prominent among them have been investments in EOS, the Algorand ecosystem, and the TRON ecosystem.

Recently appearing on the BlockBeats podcast, Grachev defended the company, outlining that it was not involved in market manipulation in response to recent assertions to the contrary.

“We do not engage in any manipulative behavior,” Grachev stated. “Of course, we have the futures market, which is a tool for hedging positions and trading clubs. We are completely different from directional traders,” he added.

Gaevoy added some humor to the mix by sharing a meme, raising questions about the maturity level of these prominent figures in the crypto industry. The spat provoked a broad array of commentary from the crypto community.

 

Crypto immaturity

The very public clash raises concerns about how traditional Wall Street firms, currently making bold moves into the crypto space, might perceive such behavior. Notably, firms like BlackRock have been involved in Bitcoin ETF applications, signaling a growing interest in cryptocurrency among mainstream financial institutions. In response to Gaevoy and Grachev, one commentator wrote: “The institutions are never coming back.”

While it would appear that there’s no love lost between DWF, GSR, and Wintermute, it also seems evident that both market makers can agree on Singapore as being an appropriate location from where to operate a crypto business. While Wintermute is London-based, it revealed recently that it was expanding its operations in Singapore. Like Wintermute, GSR is primarily based in London although it too maintains a presence in Singapore to service Asia-centric business.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 18, 2023

Korean Experts Advocate for Global Crypto Info Exchange to Combat Tax Evasion

Korean Experts Advocate for Global Crypto Info Exchange to Combat Tax EvasionIn a recent event held to discuss the tax regime in South Korea, law professors offered a suggestion to combat tax evasion associated with cryptocurrencies. They proposed the implementation of a global cryptocurrency information exchange system for more effective response measures.Kim Beom-jun, a professor at the University of Seoul Law School, and Kim Seok-hwan, a professor at Kangwon National University Law School, delved into this matter last Friday at the tax administration forum that took place at the Korea Federation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (KBIZ).Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsRising crypto adoptionAccording to their report, the cryptocurrency market is currently facing challenges stemming from the Terra-Luna incident and the broader economic downturn caused by rising interest rates and inflation. However, it’s worth noting that in Korea alone, there are approximately 6.27 million cryptocurrency exchange users, with a collective market capitalization of around KRW 19.4 trillion ($14.6 billion). This suggests that cryptocurrencies continue to integrate into our everyday lives.Crypto tax starting in 2025Starting in 2025, South Korea is set to impose taxes on income from cryptocurrency trading. However, before the tax is put into effect, there is a pressing need for administrative enhancements aimed at preventing tax evasion involving cryptocurrencies. These initiatives encompass the development of crypto-tracking technology and the allocation of sufficient staff and budgets to enable tax authorities to effectively address crypto-related issues.Foreign exchanges and DeFi platformsDuring the forum, experts voiced concerns about the possibility of tax evasion through the use of overseas crypto exchanges and decentralized platforms.Tax specialists pointed out that it’s difficult to expect people to fully meet their tax obligations when they’re trading on international exchanges. They also emphasized the challenges in collecting accurate tax information from crypto users who report transactions in overseas financial accounts.OECD’s initiativeIn August 2022, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) gave the greenlight to the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). This framework aims to standardize the reporting of tax information related to crypto-asset transactions and facilitate the automatic exchange of such information. During the forum, researchers proposed that in the future, if Korea decides to participate in the OECD’s CARF, it should not only establish a cooperative system between virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and regulatory authorities but also revisit and amend pertinent laws.Additionally, presenters at the forum underlined the necessity of obligating taxpayers to furnish essential tax information for effective virtual asset taxation. They also stressed the importance of implementing appropriate sanctions in cases where taxpayers fail to comply with these reporting requirements.Commissioner Kim Chang-ki of the National Tax Service (NTS) stated that the agency is committed to enhancing tax accountability and transparency. He added that the NTS will take strong measures against malicious tax evasion activities, especially those involving online platforms.Furthermore, Commissioner Kim mentioned that the tax agency is boosting its investigative capabilities using scientific methods to combat emerging forms of tax evasion, like those related to virtual assets. He also said the NTS is expanding its international collaboration and devising other measures.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 16, 2023

Tether Critics Point to Previous Chinese Securities Backing

Tether Critics Point to Previous Chinese Securities BackingUSDT stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT) has long faced persistent scrutiny and criticism due to the lack of transparency surrounding the assets backing their digital currencies. The latest allegations come in the form of a report by Bloomberg on Friday suggesting that the world’s largest stablecoin was once backed by securities issued by Chinese companies.Photo by Manuel Joseph on PexelsNYAG releases documentsThese findings were based on documents made public by the New York Attorney General (NY AG). The documents disclosed that Tether had listed securities issued by China’s state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China as part of its reserves backing the USDT stablecoin.Rumors about USDT’s exposure to Chinese securities have circulated for a number of years. In 2021, a Bloomberg research report revealed that Tether’s reserves reportedly included billions of dollars in short-term loans to China-based companies, as well as a significant loan to the collapsed crypto lender Celsius Network.However, in February 2021, Tether reached a settlement with the NY AG’s office over accusations of providing misleading information about its reserves and losses. To address these concerns, Tether handed over documents such as letters, bank accounts, reserve holdings, and wallet addresses through the law firm Steptoe.Attestation reportTether’s latest attestation report for Q1 2023, released on May 10, offered further details about its reserves. According to the report, Tether’s reserves were valued at $81.8 billion at the end of the quarter, a significant increase from the earlier period of $14.8 billion. These reserves consisted of $53 billion in US Treasuries, $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, and $5.3 billion in loans described as “over-collateralized.”The disclosure of Tether’s previous backing by Chinese securities adds another layer of complexity to the stablecoin landscape, raising questions about the risk exposure and potential impact on the stability of these digital assets. Using Chinese commercial paper to back a US dollar stablecoin is a risky endeavor.It raises the same issues as we’ve seen with the plethora of crypto lenders that went bankrupt in 2022. In those cases, they were using customer money to speculate and turn a profit. That’s fine when it works but when it goes wrong, it is customers who suffer. In its defense, Tether has stated that it only held A1 rated banking sector Chinese commercial paper in 2022 in state-owned Chinese companies like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp., and Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. It reduced this exposure to zero later that year.With the cryptocurrency community and regulators seeking greater transparency and accountability, the industry is likely to face increased scrutiny and calls for enhanced regulations to ensure the integrity of stablecoin operations moving forward.As regulators continue to assess and navigate the evolving crypto market, it remains to be seen how the industry will address these concerns and establish clearer guidelines for stablecoin issuers to ensure the trust and confidence of market participants.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Feb 12, 2025

Japan orders Apple, Google to remove unregistered crypto exchange apps

Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA), a government agency and financial regulator responsible for overseeing banking, securities and exchange, has ordered both Apple and Google to remove specified unregistered crypto exchange apps from the Japanese versions of their app stores.Photo by Louie Martinez on UnsplashFive exchange apps specifiedIt is understood that the request was made at the beginning of this month, with the regulator specifically calling for the removal of the ability of Japanese consumers to download apps related to Bybit, MEXC Global, LBank Exchange, KuCoin and Bitget. In response to a query from The Block, Bitget Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Hon Ng said that the company is “aware of the issue and sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused by the temporary removal of the Bitget app from the iOS App Store in Japan." The Bitget CLO went on to state that the company is working with Apple and regulators to resolve the matter. News of the regulator’s request emerged via a report published by Japanese financial media platform Nikkei on Feb. 7.  Apple had removed the apps from its App Store on Feb. 6. Reclassification of digital assets as securitiesA subsequent report by Nikkei on Feb. 10 suggests that the FSA is considering classifying digital assets as financial products akin to securities. The objective of the move is to protect Japanese investors as it would mean increased disclosure requirements from those that offer crypto-related investment products. Last August, FSA Commissioner Hideki Ito told Bloomberg that any decision to approve crypto-linked exchange-traded funds (ETFs) requires “careful consideration.” At the time Ito said that many people believe that digital assets “do not necessarily contribute to the wealth creation of the Japanese people in a stable and long-term manner.” The Japanese have been far more cautious in their approach to virtual assets by comparison with other Asian centers such as Hong Kong, which had approved spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs some time ago. It appears that Japan’s FSA is wary of the volatility of cryptocurrencies and risks associated with the nascent assets. It’s understood that the FSA will announce crypto policy reforms by June 2025. Legislative amendments would then follow in the following parliamentary session in 2026. The change would mean a lifting of the current prohibition related to crypto ETFs. Another aspect likely to be reformed is taxation as it relates to crypto. It’s thought that a reduction from the existing 55% tax rate on crypto to 20% is on the cards. This is not the first occasion when a regulator has leaned on Apple and Google to cut off access to crypto exchange apps. In January 2024 Apple India blocked access to eight exchanges which had been subject of a show-cause notice from India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). Following a seven month ban, access to the Binance app was subsequently restored once it had come back into compliance in India. In April 2024 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the Philippines had ordered both Google and Apple to remove the Binance app from their app stores on the basis that it posed a risk to Filipino investors at the time.

news
Loading