Crypto Titans Clash on Elon Musk’s X

Regulatory crackdown as Hong Kong authorities act against crypto entitiesIn a recent move, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has issued a public warning against suspected virtual asset-related frauds involving HongKongDAO and BitCuped, marking a significant crackdown on deceptive practices in the crypto space.The action taken by the SFC in conjunction with the Hong Kong Police Force was outlined in a notice published on Wednesday. The notice stated:“The SFC suspects HongKongDAO may be disseminating false and misleading information about itself and its business through online channels.”In relation to BitCuped, it stated: “The SFC notes that BitCuped claims on its website that ‘Laura Cha’ and ‘Nicolas Aguzin’ serve as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer respectively, when in fact none of them has any affiliations with BitCuped.”Photo by Teodor Kuduschiev on UnsplashHongKongDAO’s alleged misinformationOperating under the name “Hong Kong Digital Research Institute,” HongKongDAO has faced accusations of disseminating false and misleading information. The SFC expressed concerns about the claims made by HongKongDAO, including assertions of licensing by the SFC, engagement in regulated activities since July 2020, and bids for a “Hong Kong Digital Currency Exchange Licence” related to the government’s stablecoins framework.The SFC contends that these claims are unfounded and could potentially mislead the public into believing that HongKongDAO’s services are officially sanctioned and legitimate.HongKongDAO seems to manage at least two Telegram groups, one in Chinese with over 10,000 members and the other in English with over 1,700 members. Within these groups, there appears to be a promotion of the purported “market” price and future market value of the HKD token, enticing investors to make purchases.Allegations of BitCuped false affiliationsSimultaneously, BitCuped has been accused of making fraudulent claims to enhance the credibility of its operations. The company falsely asserted affiliations with prominent figures Laura Cha and Nicolas Aguzin, claiming them as its chairman and CEO, respectively. However, the SFC has refuted these affiliations. Laura Cha is the Chairman of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), while Nicolas Aguzin is the Executive Director and CEO of HKEX.Taking proactive measures, the SFC has requested the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to the websites of both HongKongDAO and BitCuped. Cease and desist letters have also been issued to the operators of these websites, demanding the cessation of the sale of HKD Tokens offered by HongKongDAO.Series of crypto scamsFollowing the JPEX fraud allegations in September, Hong Kong faced another cryptocurrency exchange scandal involving Hounax in November. With at least 145 police reports filed and a sum of over HK$148 million ($19 million) involved, affected investors expressed frustration at what they deemed a slow response from regulatory bodies.These incidents have reignited discussions about the need for more robust cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong. The city’s aspiration to become a global hub for crypto innovation and adoption faces challenges due to a lack of clear and consistent regulation, leaving investors vulnerable to fraud and manipulation.In light of these developments, the SFC emphasized the importance of public caution regarding investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. The regulator urged vigilance against social media and instant messaging platforms where individuals, not investment professionals, might lure unsuspecting investors.

Tether Critics Point to Previous Chinese Securities BackingUSDT stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT) has long faced persistent scrutiny and criticism due to the lack of transparency surrounding the assets backing their digital currencies. The latest allegations come in the form of a report by Bloomberg on Friday suggesting that the world’s largest stablecoin was once backed by securities issued by Chinese companies.Photo by Manuel Joseph on PexelsNYAG releases documentsThese findings were based on documents made public by the New York Attorney General (NY AG). The documents disclosed that Tether had listed securities issued by China’s state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China as part of its reserves backing the USDT stablecoin.Rumors about USDT’s exposure to Chinese securities have circulated for a number of years. In 2021, a Bloomberg research report revealed that Tether’s reserves reportedly included billions of dollars in short-term loans to China-based companies, as well as a significant loan to the collapsed crypto lender Celsius Network.However, in February 2021, Tether reached a settlement with the NY AG’s office over accusations of providing misleading information about its reserves and losses. To address these concerns, Tether handed over documents such as letters, bank accounts, reserve holdings, and wallet addresses through the law firm Steptoe.Attestation reportTether’s latest attestation report for Q1 2023, released on May 10, offered further details about its reserves. According to the report, Tether’s reserves were valued at $81.8 billion at the end of the quarter, a significant increase from the earlier period of $14.8 billion. These reserves consisted of $53 billion in US Treasuries, $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, and $5.3 billion in loans described as “over-collateralized.”The disclosure of Tether’s previous backing by Chinese securities adds another layer of complexity to the stablecoin landscape, raising questions about the risk exposure and potential impact on the stability of these digital assets. Using Chinese commercial paper to back a US dollar stablecoin is a risky endeavor.It raises the same issues as we’ve seen with the plethora of crypto lenders that went bankrupt in 2022. In those cases, they were using customer money to speculate and turn a profit. That’s fine when it works but when it goes wrong, it is customers who suffer. In its defense, Tether has stated that it only held A1 rated banking sector Chinese commercial paper in 2022 in state-owned Chinese companies like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp., and Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. It reduced this exposure to zero later that year.With the cryptocurrency community and regulators seeking greater transparency and accountability, the industry is likely to face increased scrutiny and calls for enhanced regulations to ensure the integrity of stablecoin operations moving forward.As regulators continue to assess and navigate the evolving crypto market, it remains to be seen how the industry will address these concerns and establish clearer guidelines for stablecoin issuers to ensure the trust and confidence of market participants.

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Southeast Asian nation’s securities regulator, is believed to be considering moving towards approving spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) products.  In an interview with Bloomberg, the Thai SEC’s Secretary-General, Pornanong Budsaratragoon, said that the agency is weighing up whether to allow individual investors and institutions to access spot Bitcoin ETFs. Budsaratragoon stated: “We have to adapt and ensure that our investors have more options in crypto assets with proper protection.”Photo by Photo By: Kaboompics.com on PexelsMoving along with global crypto adoptionJanuary 10 marked the first anniversary of the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States. Given that the U.S. is home to the world’s largest capital markets, that decision has had an impact internationally. That reality is borne out by one of Budsaratragoon’s comments. She stated: “Like it or not, we have to move along with more adoption of cryptocurrencies worldwide.” While the SEC Secretary-General’s comment suggests that she feels a compulsion to move forward in line with developments elsewhere, that wasn’t the agency’s position in January 2024 following spot Bitcoin ETF approval in the U.S.  Shortly afterwards, the regulator, alongside its regional counterpart in Singapore, outlined that it had no plans to approve the product in Thailand, stating: "The SEC has been following these developments closely but we do not have a policy to allow spot Bitcoin ETFs to be established in Thailand for the time being.” Initial access to overseas productsIn March of last year, the agency had warmed to the Bitcoin ETF product offering to a greater extent, by approving access to such products listed overseas to high-net-worth individuals and institutions. Off the back of that approval, One Asset Management (ONEAM) launched a fund of funds in June 2024, enabling Thai investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin ETFs which had been publicly listed overseas. Back in October, Nirun Fuwattananukul, CEO of Binance Thailand, stated in an opinion piece published by the Bangkok Post that he felt that the Thai crypto market was moving from retail towards a focus on the institutions. He stated:“By allowing more institutional funds to participate, the SEC is enabling a diverse range of investment strategies and helping digital assets gain broader acceptance in the mainstream.” Fuwattananukul suggested that the local regulator had made some changes on Oct. 9, paving the way for institutional-grade mutual and private funds to invest in crypto products. The approval of locally listed Bitcoin ETF products would broaden investor access to digital assets in Thailand, particularly in relation to institutional investors, which is in line with the thinking of the Binance executive. Earlier this month, Thailand’s Deputy Prime Minister, Pichai Chunhavajira, announced that a pilot program was being launched to help foreign tourists pay for goods and services using crypto within the Thai resort city of Phuket.  Meanwhile, former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra expressed a bullish view on crypto in a speech he made in Bangkok last week. Shinawatra called on the country’s institutions to be more open to cryptocurrency, while citing regulatory developments in the U.S. relative to the emerging asset class.