Binance APAC Head Resigns Amid Regulatory Challenges

FTX, the failed cryptocurrency exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, has taken legal action by filing a lawsuit against four former employees of Salameda, a Hong Kong-based affiliate closely linked to the exchange’s former CEO.According to a Delaware bankruptcy court filing in the United States on Thursday, the lawsuit alleges that five individuals exploited their personal connections to prioritize their asset withdrawals from FTX during a period of uncertainty regarding the exchange’s stability. The defendants in question are Salameda’s former employees — Michael Burgess, Matthew Burgess, Kevin Nguyen, and Darren Wong — as well as Michael and Matthew’s mother, Lesley Burgess, and two companies: 3Twelve Ventures and BDK Consulting.Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash Preference period clawbackThe critical withdrawals occurred within the 90-day period leading up to FTX’s bankruptcy filing on November 11, commonly referred to as the “Preference Period.” Under US law, customers who withdrew their crypto assets during this timeframe could potentially face lawsuits from the exchange’s creditors seeking to recover these funds, a process known as a “clawback” under bankruptcy regulations.The total value of these suspicious transfers is estimated at $157.3 million, with more than $123 million of that sum withdrawn after November 7, 2022. Michael Burgess is alleged to have received around $73 million of these illicit withdrawals.The lawsuit claims that the individuals leveraged their connections within FTX Group to ensure preferential treatment over other customers. In a specific accusation, Matthew Burgess is said to have engaged other FTX Group employees to expedite certain withdrawal requests from his FTX US exchange accounts while falsely representing the accounts as his own. 11th hour withdrawalsIn this way, Burgess and the other four defendants managed to get funds out when most other FTX customers couldn’t. The final withdrawals were executed only hours before FTX.com suspended all withdrawals on November 8, 2022, according to the lawsuit. As one commentator on X put it, “FTX employees were manually reviewing large withdrawals & pushing some ahead.”The legal filing also delves into the significant profits the defendants reportedly accrued from trading cryptocurrencies in the months leading up to FTX’s collapse. Even after their apparent departure from the FTX Group, Michael Burgess, Nguyen, and Wong actively traded through entities such as 3Twelve and BDK, with monthly trading volumes ranging from $100 million to $400 million.A noteworthy aspect of this activity is that their trading capital was allegedly derived from the FTX Group. The court filing goes on to claim that “Burgess, Nguyen and Wong received substantial transfers of digital assets and fiat currency from exchange accounts associated with FTX Group entities, including approximately 13.1 million FTT sent to Darren Wong, more than 1 million SOL sent to Michael Burgess, and nearly $4 million USD for ‘bonuses’ between Michael Burgess, Nguyen and Wong.” Retail clawback riskThis legal battle and the allegations against the former Salameda employees are being watched closely by other FTX bankruptcy stakeholders. The FTX Debtor has suggested that it will pursue clawbacks vigorously. That has concerned former retail customers who managed to withdraw assets in the final days before the platform collapsed. Equally, it is a worry for current FTX creditors who may have withdrawn some but not all of their assets before the exchange was shuttered.

Experts Discuss Korean Security Token MarketSince the Korean financial regulator released regulatory guidelines on security tokens in February, many have anticipated that the introduction of security tokens would transform the concept of investment and give rise to new market strategies based on blockchain technology.©Pexels/PixabayIndustry professionals have expressed their opinions on the matter in interviews with media outlets.Token issuance and distributionPark Hyo-jin, vice president at Sejong Telecom, in a recent interview with Korean media outlet Digital Today, expressed his disappointment about the Korean government’s decision to separate token issuance from token distribution. Sejong Telecom is the developer and operator of the blockchain-based real estate fractional investment platform Bbric.According to Park, the capital market law separates token issuance from token distribution in order to prevent conflicts of interest, as interested parties may attempt to control financial products according to their own preferences. However, things are different with security tokens, Park believes. With the help of blockchain technology, a mainnet can issue and distribute tokens without intermediaries.Higher investment limitsPark emphasized the importance of increasing investment limits and cited the small size of the Korea New Exchange (KONEX), a stock exchange for small enterprises, as a reason for its lack of activity. He added that higher caps would result in positive ripple effects.Regarding real estate security tokens, Park doesn’t expect more profitable products, but sees that more investment choices will be available. He is particularly interested in investment contract securities. One such example is renting a piece of land to farmers to distribute harvest profits.Connection with virtual assetsThe security token market will face limitations if it’s not connected with its virtual asset counterpart. He mentioned the need for a digital asset law to create an ecosystem that links security tokens with virtual assets.Meanwhile, in an interview with Economic Review, Lee Kun-ho, former CEO of KB Kookmin Bank, showed a somewhat pessimistic view about the Korean security token market while admitting its potential.Various uncertaintiesIn his opinion, while real estate holds potential as a security token investment, government policies may introduce uncertainties. Likewise, the markets for music and artwork are also subject to unpredictability. Consequently, security token strategies in these areas could encounter limitations.Lee also sees that some of the services don’t necessitate blockchain technology. It is unlikely that any clear winners will emerge in the short term; therefore, it is vital for the industry to approach this issue with prudence, he added.

GRVT, a hybrid cryptocurrency exchange platform that bases its operations in Singapore, has secured a trading license in Bermuda which the project claims, makes it the first regulated decentralized exchange (DEX).  In a press release published on the project’s behalf by PR Newswire on Dec. 6, the project, which aspires to be “Goldman Sachs on blockchain,” announced the acquisition of a Class M Digital Asset Business License from the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA). Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashAiming for further licensingThe license puts the firm on a path to operate as a fully regulated DEX. Securing this Class M license isn’t the end of the project’s regulatory compliant endeavors, however. Class M confers a “modified” exchange license under the Bermuda Digital Asset Business Act (DABA). Class M covers pre-operational activities while the service remains within a sandbox environment. The company hopes to have acquired Class F or “Full” licensing designation by mid-2025. At that point, GRVT will be in a position to take its service from a sandbox environment to full launch of its institutional-grade perps DEX in a regulatory compliant manner. On X GRVT suggested that this licensing is pivotal in the movement of decentralized finance (DeFi) towards mainstream adoption. “With this milestone, DeFi evolves - safer for users and institutions alike,” the project wrote. Hybrid approachAs a hybrid DEX, GRVT combines the decentralization of DeFi with the structure and compliance required for the participation of institutional investors. Commenting on this latest development, GRVT CEO Hong Yea stated:”We've always believed compliance should be the foundation for crypto and DeFi, not an afterthought. Without it, earning institutional trust—and bringing revolutionary technologies to the mainstream—becomes nearly impossible." Yea told Cointelegraph that in two weeks time, the project will officially launch its mainnet to all users. “Our trading volume will then be available through major external data providers,” he added. In preparation for that mainnet launch, the project announced in September that it had partnered with 16 market makers including Galaxy Trading, Amber Group, QCP and others, in order to ensure that the platform has sufficient liquidity in place to enable a smooth launch. Users have been testing the platform following its Open Beta Testnet launch in August. The GRVT CEO believes that the project can “unify cryptocurrency and mainstream finance, creating a system where assets move freely and all forms of value coexist in one integrated ecosystem.”   A regulated yet decentralized offeringReferring to the two main components baked into the GRVT offering, he said that “decentralization distributes control away from central authorities, promoting transparency, security, and user empowerment.” Meanwhile, “regulation establishes standards to protect users, ensure market integrity and promote fair practices.” In successfully pursuing licensing in Bermuda, GRVT joins a list of more than 30 firms in the digital assets sector who have obtained licensing in the British overseas territory. In October global cryptocurrency exchange platform Kraken launched a Bermuda-based derivatives trading business having obtained licensing from the BMA. USDM stablecoin issuer Mountain Protocol received a Class F license from the BMA in July. Other entities successfully licensed by the BMA include Coinbase, HashKey, Circle, Bittrex and Zero Hash.