NPIXEL Wraps Up 2nd Community Test for Web3 Game “Gran Saga: Unlimited”

Mixin Network Suspends Services Amid $200 Million HackOn Monday, Mixin Network, a decentralized peer-to-peer network whose project team is based in Hong Kong, officially confirmed a substantial security breach that resulted in the loss of approximately $200 million in crypto assets from its mainnet.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashSeptember 23 hackThis incident, disclosed via an X (formerly Twitter) post, prompted the immediate suspension of all deposit and withdrawal services on Mixin Network until further notice.The project team outlined that the hack occurred on September 23, exposing vulnerabilities that allowed malicious actors to compromise the database of a third-party cloud service provider. Mixin Network has taken action to address the situation, enlisting the expertise of Singapore-headquartered blockchain security investigator SlowMist and the support of Google to conduct a thorough investigation and formulate a recovery plan.At the time of the breach, Mixin Network’s holdings included $94.48 million in Ether, $23.55 million in Dai, and $23.3 million in Bitcoin, as reported in an independent investigation by PeckShield. The total value of assets affected amounted to $141.32 million.Cyvers, an Israeli Web3 security firm, has also been looking into the matter on Monday. In a social media post, the firm stated:”Our internal investigation has uncovered suspicious funding transactions involving @MixinKernel hacker addresses. Two of hacker addresses received 51 $ETH from 0x1795F0eBDa5A836aE63F28CE546E72de069A8bd2 who was interacted with @HuobiGlobal and @binance.”The firm goes on to call on Binance and its CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) and Huobi to help identify the wallet address in question.Halting withdrawalsIn response to the security breach, Mixin Network has temporarily halted all deposits and withdrawals on its platform. These services will only resume once the vulnerabilities have been identified and fully resolved. On X, the project stated:”Deposit and withdrawal services on Mixin Network have been temporarily suspended. After discussion and consensus among all nodes, these services will be reopened once the vulnerabilities are confirmed and fixed. During this period, transfers are not affected.”Details regarding the plans to recover the lost assets for affected users have yet to be announced.Despite initial promises that Mixin Network’s Founder, Feng Xiaodong, would address the incident in a public Mandarin live stream on September 25, links to the live stream were not provided on the official social media channels or the website mixin.network.The incident has garnered criticism on the basis of a lack of decentralization. One commentator stated:”Some of those blockchain protocols are so decentralized that when their cloud database is hacked, coins are also gone.”Ongoing hacksThis security breach on Mixin Network is the latest in a series of high-profile crypto-related incidents. Ethereum Co-Founder Vitalik Buterin recently fell victim to a SIM swap attack, which resulted in the compromise of his X (formerly Twitter) account.In a statement, Buterin revealed that the hackers had successfully executed a SIM swap, a type of attack that targets the victim’s mobile phone number to gain unauthorized access to various online accounts, including social media, banking, and cryptocurrency platforms.The repercussions of the Mixin Network hack underscore the ongoing challenges faced by the crypto industry in ensuring the security and protection of digital assets. As investigations continue, affected users await further developments and the eventual resumption of deposit and withdrawal services.

In the ongoing legal tussle over cryptocurrency assets, the High Court of Singapore has rejected a plea by the bankrupt crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Arthur Cheong, the founder of Web3 investment firm DeFiance Capital. This ruling represents a pivotal moment in the $140 million dispute, shedding light on the ownership and control of assets, while building upon DeFiance Capital’s previous success back in August of last year in having its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore endorsed.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashRecognizing assets held in trustOn Jan. 26, a Singapore judge ruled against 3AC's request to have Cheong’s claim thrown out, stating that DeFiance Capital has adequately demonstrated the existence of a Singapore-based trust safeguarding its assets. This revelation could potentially shield DeFiance Capital from 3AC's liquidators, marking a crucial juncture in the legal battle. The dispute traces back to an agreement where Cheong was set to launch an independent fund on the 3AC Group platform, with ownership and control vested in DeFiance Capital. This fund, leveraging 3AC's infrastructure, faced disagreements over the transfer of certain assets, whose undisclosed value became a point of contention in court documents. The downfall of the $10 billion 3AC hedge fund, responsible for the "Super Cycle" thesis predicting perpetual crypto price increases, had widespread repercussions in the crypto industry. DeFiance Capital bore the brunt of this collapse and the recent court ruling brings the firm closer to resolving the aftermath favorably. The ongoing argument holds strategic importance for DeFiance Capital, as the investment firm challenges any legal obligation for its shareholders to compensate 3AC creditors. "Wassielawyer," a pseudonymous restructuring attorney advising DeFiance Capital's founder Arthur Cheong, highlighted the significance of this stance on social media. Positive signThe judge's acknowledgment of the trust, while not conclusive, is viewed as a positive sign for DeFiance Capital. In a series of posts on the X social media platform, Wassielawyer outlined on Thursday that he sees this as "much-needed vindication" for Cheong, signaling a potential turn in favor of the investment firm. Wassielawyer emphasized that DeFiance Capital merely utilized 3AC's legal structure, without commingling operations. This distinction becomes crucial as carefully drafted legal documents form the basis for 3AC creditors attempting to seize DeFiance Capital funds. The restructuring professional added:”[DeFiance Capital] have on the basis of the substantive facts, ran an argument that the assets of DCs should not be used to pay back 3AC creditors. This eventuality would be manifestly unjust, enriching the creditors of 3AC at the expense of innocent DC investors.” Once a major player in the crypto hedge fund arena, 3AC's demise resulted from exposure to Terra, staked Ethereum and Grayscale's Bitcoin Trust. The bankruptcy filing on June 30, 2022, marked the end of an era for the once-mighty fund. Established in 2020, DeFiance Capital specializes in crypto investments, focusing on decentralized finance and GameFi. It has supported projects such as dYdX, Aave and Lido. This decision establishes a precedent for similar cases, particularly in jurisdictions like Singapore, emerging as pivotal hubs for cryptocurrency and blockchain-related activities. The outcome holds implications for how such legal disputes will be handled in the future, shaping the landscape of crypto-related legal proceedings. 

Recent developments relative to governance of the CRO token, a native token belonging to the Cronos blockchain, have proven controversial, with many in the community unhappy with the actions of Singapore-headquartered Crypto.com.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashProposal controversyThe controversy surrounds a proposal put forward by Crypto.com, which originally developed the Cronos blockchain in 2021, to mint 70 billion CRO tokens. The move would effectively roll back a CRO token burn that took place in 2021. The governance process applicable to the proposal meant that CRO token holders could vote on the proposal between March 2 and March 16. For the majority of that voting period, the outcome appeared to be uncertain. The “yes” vote had a narrow lead, but it would have been insufficient to reach the required 33.4% quorum of eligible votes. Exceeding the quorumHowever, at 14:00 UTC on Sunday, a last-minute influx of 3.35 billion tokens tipped the balance firmly in favor of the proposal while well exceeding the minimum turnout as 70.18% of eligible votes were cast. 61.18% voted in favor, with 17.61% against. Many CRO token holders who opposed the proposal are aggrieved at the manner in which this late voting surge came about. It’s understood that these last-minute votes came from blockchain validators controlled by Crypto.com. Crypto.com is understood to hold in the region of 80% of the voting power. In exercising that voting clout, many CRO holders feel that it has undermined the will of the community. Some commentators believe that increasing the token supply will result in a loss of trust in the project, damaging investor confidence going forward. Earlier this month, Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek responded to community pushback against the proposal. Marszalek suggested that the proposal ties in with an overall strategy for the success of the Cronos blockchain and its CRO token in the long term.  He pointed to four items that are relevant in achieving success for an altcoin like CRO. These included finding product-market fit, the need to redeploy free cashflows, successfully launching exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and participating in reserve-building initiatives.  ‘Free to vote and free to sell’The strategy relies upon building demand in order to achieve longer-term success. On X, Marszalek wrote: “People who do not agree that this is the right approach are free to vote & free to sell. We will stay laser focused on building towards new ATHs [all-time-highs].” In another X post on March 19, the Crypto.com CEO outlined that the company generated $1.5 billion in revenue in 2024 while servicing the needs of 140 million users on the platform. The company spent $700 million on branding, user acquisition and user incentives in 2024. Its operations turned a net profit of $300 million.  Crypto.com has also made further headway on the compliance front over the course of the past week. The company received licensing approval in Dubai to offer derivatives from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). On March 17 the company announced that it had successfully achieved Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) registration with the Argentine regulator.