Singaporean VC Pledges Funding for Web3 Accelerator

Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) is moving to close gaps in crypto regulation and support a new bank-led stablecoin pilot, as markets watch for a potential Bank of Japan rate hike. Tougher oversight of crypto lending and IEOsAccording to a CoinPost report, at the fifth meeting of its Digital Asset Working Group held last week, the FSA discussed introducing new requirements to bring crypto lending clearly within the regulatory framework. While firms managing or staking crypto must register as exchanges, some operators have avoided registration by structuring services as borrowing schemes, which are not legally treated as asset management.Photo by Possessed Photography on UnsplashThe FSA flagged that users face both credit and volatility risks, yet operators are not required to segregate customer assets or use cold wallets. Some services offer returns around 10% or tie up funds for several years, with weak risk management and exposure to re-lending defaults and staking slashing. Under the new policy direction, operators will need stronger risk management for re-lending and staking, tighter custody controls, and clearer risk disclosures and advertising. Institutional-only borrowing not offered to the public will remain exempt. Some members questioned whether the new requirements would be practical to implement for off-chain operators, noting that staking is fundamentally on-chain. The group also examined initial exchange offerings (IEOs) lacking financial audits, particularly those aimed at retail investors. Members discussed limits similar to equity crowdfunding: investments over 500,000 yen ($3,000) capped at 5% of annual income or net assets, up to 2 million yen ($13,000). Most past domestic IEOs were under 500,000 yen ($3,200). Some warned such caps could be bypassed through secondary trading, where tokens are immediately tradable. Major banks pilot stablecoinAlongside stricter rules, the FSA will support a stablecoin pilot led by MUFG Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, and Mizuho Bank. CoinDesk Japan noted the project, the first under the Payment Innovation Project, will include three additional participants. Mitsubishi Corporation will oversee operations, while Progmat and Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking will handle issuance and custody. The pilot, launching this month with implementation targeted within the year, will test whether a joint stablecoin by major banks can navigate regulatory and operational challenges. Rate hike speculation mountsJapan’s calibrated digital asset push comes as speculation grows over a possible Bank of Japan (BOJ) rate hike next month. Minutes from the BOJ’s October meeting, cited by South Korean outlet Edaily, show one board member saying most conditions for a hike have been met and that financial conditions would stay easy even after an increase. The BOJ kept its rate at 0.5% at that meeting. A rate hike was described as likely if firms are seen committing to wage increases ahead of next spring’s labor talks and if no major global shocks emerge. Markets, however, remain cautious, citing uncertainty over U.S. tariff effects and whether newly elected Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi will endorse such a hawkish stance. 

Regulatory Pressure Sees Binance Cease Card Offering in the Middle EastLeading global crypto exchange Binance has announced the discontinuation of its card services in the Middle East.Users hailing from the region will have until September 21 to maximize the utility of their Binance cards before the product will no longer be available to them. Latin America is another region which will be similarly affected by the decision. Binance Customer Support stated: “The Binance Card will regrettably no longer be accessible to users based in Latin America and the Middle East.”Photo by rupixen.com on UnsplashEnabling crypto spendingDistinct from conventional debit cards, these Binance cards have offered users the convenience of settling day-to-day expenses with crypto assets. However, this unique feature is now set to become a relic as the exchange shifts its strategy in response to evolving regulatory dynamics.It’s worth noting that this product curtailment will only impact less than 1% of users situated in these regions. Other Binance services around the world will continue unimpeded. That said, products like this one are significant as they help to bridge the gap between the crypto sphere and conventional commerce.As a substitute, Binance is actively championing its “Binance Pay” platform, touting it as “an advanced cryptocurrency payment solution that is both contactless and internationally accessible.”Checkout.com setbackFinancial pundits are speculating that this strategic move could be closely intertwined with recent realignments in Binance’s corporate partnerships. Notably, the UK-based payment processor, Checkout.com, severed its connections with Binance earlier this month amidst mounting regional regulatory interventions and concerns.Responding to this severed partnership, Binance has indicated a contemplation of legal recourse against Checkout.com’s decision. The backdrop of this collaboration has been problematic since its inception in 2020. Initial troubles surfaced when the absence of the 3-D Secure system facilitated a criminal syndicate to conduct a $10 million transaction spree on Binance.Clash with global regulatorsRecent months have seen Binance find itself entangled in a web of legal battles. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) leveled allegations against Binance, accusing the exchange of deceiving regulatory bodies and mishandling customer funds.Meanwhile, French authorities have intensified their scrutiny, suspecting Binance of potential involvement in money laundering activities. As a domino effect, Binance had to exit numerous markets due to its inability to meet the stringent compliance criteria. Over the course of just three months, the company has lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Cyprus.Asian pivotAs the company comes under pressure in Western markets, it has focused on furthering its offering in the Asian region. In May, its subsidiary, Gulf Binance, successfully acquired a trading license in Thailand. Later that month, the company announced plans for a dedicated platform for Japanese customers.Parrot Capital, a decentralized hedge fund, has issued a direct recommendation to Binance Card users in response to the news:“Check your daily limits. Withdraw via ATM all your funds or spend them ASAP or risk losing them for good.”This sustained and pervasive scrutiny underscores the formidable challenges faced by the leading crypto exchange. As the regulatory landscape evolves, exchanges like Binance are being forced to re-calibrate in order to navigate an ever-changing environment.

A Chinese creditor of failed crypto exchange FTX has filed an objection on his own behalf and that of 300 others, with a U.S. bankruptcy court against a motion lodged with a view towards excluding payouts to creditors resident in China, Russia and 47 other foreign jurisdictions.Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on UnsplashPotential distribution forfeitureThe FTX Recovery Trust, an entity formed in January to oversee the FTX bankruptcy estate following the adoption of a plan of reorganization, filed a motion last week seeking the approval of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in the United States to adhere to new parameters related to the claims of creditors residing in restricted overseas jurisdictions. Besides China and Russia, the list of restricted jurisdictions also includes many within the Asian region, including  Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Macau, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan, Qatar, Bangladesh and Cambodia. The FTX estate claims that these jurisdictions have regulations and laws restricting cryptocurrency transactions. In such cases, the FTX Recovery Trust claims that it cannot break local laws.  The difficulty for creditors resident in these countries is that if it's deemed illegal to reimburse them, they won’t qualify for the next scheduled distribution from the estate. In that instance, distribution forfeiture will be triggered. Taking to X on July 7, FTXcreditor.com, an entity that has been buying up bankruptcy claims from FTX creditors over the course of the FTX bankruptcy process, highlighted the peril that creditors residing in these restricted countries may face. It stated: “Distribution forfeiture is triggered at every distribution record date. The first record date already passed, if your claim is still tied to a local KYC when the stamp drops, that tranche is potentially gone.” Short timeframe for objectionsMr. Purple, a pseudonymous distressed assets bankruptcy professional who has been advocating for FTX creditors since the collapse of the business in November 2022, concurred with this view in a subsequent post on X. He pointed out that an extremely short timeframe has been given to affected creditors to respond. The motion was filed on July 2 and objections are due by July 15. $500 million in claims are at stake which accounts for 5% of all creditor claims. Of this, 82% of these claims belong to Chinese creditors. In a series of follow-up posts, the bankruptcy professional describes several procedural issues that he believes will result in it being incredibly difficult for affected creditors to have their funds reimbursed.Mr. Purple concludes:”The incentives are designed to be extremely risk averse in finding [a legal opinion] that paying creditors is legal! [The estate’s lawyers will] take the fees and say its not legal.” In his court filing, the Chinese creditor, who is resident in Singapore, stated: “My family holds four KYC-verified accounts with aggregate claims exceeding $15 million USD.” . . . “We have fully complied with every procedural requirement under the Plan. The proposed motion now jeopardizes our right to distribution in an arbitrary and inequitable manner.” On X, he asserted that the FTX Recovery Trust’s motion “constitutes an impermissible and material modification of the Plan.” Aside from legal action, the only other potential solution for creditors residing in restricted countries is to sell their claims. However, claims buyers are pricing in greater risk with lower rates and less favorable terms.