Phoenix rises 50% on ADX debut

Bithumb and Korbit Struggle to Gain Traction Despite Zero Trading FeesSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently eliminated trading fees, but their bold decision hasn’t yielded much results. Bithumb was the first to implement this change and attracted users for about a week, but it is now seeing a loss in market share. Korbit, following Bithumb’s example, is also struggling to achieve meaningful outcomes.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashLimited impactLocal media outlet Chosun Biz used data from crypto data platform CoinGecko to draw this conclusion. On October 26, Korbit’s daily trading volume represented 0.19% of the total trading volume among South Korea’s top five crypto exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax). This figure marked a 0.14 percentage point increase compared to the 0.05% recorded on October 19. Korbit had implemented a zero trading fee policy at 9 a.m. (KST) on October 20. Additionally, they launched a promotion offering KRW 5,000 ($3.69) worth of bitcoin to users who transferred virtual assets totaling KRW 1 million or more from Travel Rule-compliant exchanges to Korbit. While the promotion did contribute to Korbit’s market share, it still remains below 1%.Bithumb’s performance showed some improvement, albeit briefly. As of October 26, Bithumb’s market share stood at 18%, marking a 4.7 percentage point increase from its 13.3% share on October 3, the day before it eliminated trading fees. However, it’s worth noting that its market share had reached almost 30% shortly after the promotion’s launch. This indicates that its strategy is losing efficacy over time.The less-than-enthusiastic results from their daring marketing endeavors can be attributed to their inability to draw in retail investors. To begin with, Upbit, the leading player in the market, had already been providing a relatively low fee of 0.05%. Furthermore, adapting to new user interfaces on these exchanges posed a challenge. Zero trading fees weren’t attractive enough for crypto investors to leave their current platforms.Trading volume mattersIn the case of Korbit, its lower trading volume was a disadvantage when it came to attracting users. On crypto exchanges, a higher trading volume typically translates to faster trade executions. As a result, users of Korbit might experience delays in executing trades at their preferred price.Jeong Hye-won, a research associate at crypto data analytics platform Xangle, told Chosun Biz that users on exchanges with lower trading volumes tend to experience slippages due to slower transaction speeds and sparsely populated order books. A slippage means the difference between the initially placed order price and the executed order price. Jeong further explained that Korbit’s zero trading fee policy didn’t have a significant impact because it offers fewer listed tokens compared to Upbit and Bithumb.There is speculation that the free-trading fee promotions introduced by Bithumb and Korbit, despite their revenue sacrifices, might conclude sooner than initially anticipated due to their perceived ineffectiveness. Bithumb derives 99.95% of its revenue from trading fees, while Korbit relies on trading fees for 99.79% of its income. An industry insider has commented that trading fees play a vital role in an exchange’s revenue, and given Bithumb’s reported loss in earnings during the second quarter, there are concerns about their capacity to sustain this strategy.

China Sees Further Metaverse Development Through Nanjing City InitiativeNanjing City’s Jiangning district recently unveiled its ambitious plans for metaverse development as competition in China’s metaverse sector intensifies.Photo by 李 亨 on PexelsThree-year planThe district aims to lay the groundwork for blockchain-based applications by attracting 200 metaverse companies and generating an industry with an annual revenue of 20 billion yuan ($2.80 billion) by the end of 2025. That’s according to a three-year plan to accelerate metaverse development published by Jiangning district’s management committee on Saturday.To support this vision, Jiangning plans to foster collaboration between local enterprises and academic institutions, with the goal of training 10,000 metaverse professionals over the next three years.Metaverse roadmapThe district’s comprehensive roadmap includes the identification of key metaverse technologies, such as blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and virtual reality. Additionally, the plan outlines the establishment of 50 research centers and laboratories dedicated to these areas of expertise.These initiatives were unveiled during a joint summit on metaverse and artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) held at the Jiangning High-tech Development Zone, a specialized industrial park known for its focus on life sciences, software development, and equipment manufacturing.At the summit, 16 metaverse-related projects were introduced, representing a total investment of 8.1 billion yuan ($1.13 billion). These projects encompass diverse fields, including A.I., cloud computing, big data, and healthcare. Jiangning’s commitment to the metaverse extends beyond the recently announced plan, as the district has been offering financial incentives to metaverse companies since May 2022.Moreover, an investment of 800 million yuan ($112 million) has been allocated to construct a dedicated “metaverse industrial building” that will provide office spaces for metaverse enterprises.Jiangning’s efforts contribute to Nanjing City’s broader aspiration of becoming a prominent metaverse hub in China. In February of this year, Nanjing unveiled its metaverse strategy and set the ambitious target of establishing an industry generating over 135 billion yuan ($19.13 billion) in annual revenues by the end of 2025. Additionally, Nanjing launched “the Blockchain Technology and Application Innovation Platform of China” in May, aimed at promoting and advancing metaverse research nationwide.Broader Chinese metaverse strategyWhile Nanjing is moving towards metaverse development, other Chinese metropolises, including Beijing, Shanghai, and Hangzhou, are also vying for dominance. Cities such as Zhengzhou and Suzhou are also endeavoring to participate in the trending technology.Last month, Zhengzhou announced a set of policy proposals aimed at supporting metaverse-centric enterprises locally. Earlier in May, the administrative body that governs Henan Province established a 150 million yuan ($21.7 million) private equity investment fund relative to the financing of metaverse-themed projects.As cities and regions in China compete to seize the opportunities presented by the metaverse, the country is witnessing significant investments and initiatives to establish a strong foothold in this transformative technology. Nanjing’s Jiangning district’s comprehensive plan and strategic partnerships signify the region’s dedication to becoming a flourishing metaverse ecosystem, while executing on a mandate from the central government to further develop metaverse technologies within China.

Atomic Wallet Hacker Uses Lazarus Crypto MixerThe stolen cryptocurrency from the recent $35 million hack of Atomic Wallet is already being moved to a crypto mixer favored by North Korea’s notorious cyber-hacking group.Photo by Micha Brändli on UnsplashSinbad.ioAccording to UK-based crypto compliance analysis firm Elliptic, the funds have made their way to a crypto mixer used by Lazarus Group, a notorious hacker group that focuses on crypto heists which is believed to have direct ties with the North Korean government.On June 5, Elliptic’s Investigations Team revealed that it had traced the funds from the Atomic Wallet hack to the crypto mixer Sinbad.io. Lazarus had previously used the mixer to launder over $100 million in stolen crypto assets.While the exact amount sent to the mixer was not specified, Elliptic noted that the stolen funds were being exchanged for Bitcoin before undergoing obfuscation through the mixer. Additionally, Elliptic reported that Sinbad.io is likely a rebranded version of Blender.io, another mixer extensively used to launder funds by the Lazarus Group. Blender.io has been sanctioned by the US Treasury.Atomic Wallet hackThe hack of several user accounts on Atomic Wallet occurred on June 3, resulting in losses of up to $35 million. News of the issue broke with the following tweet from the project team (which has subsequently been deleted): “We have received reports of wallets being compromised. We are doing all we can to investigate and analyze the situation. As we have more information, we will share it accordingly.”In a follow-up tweet the next day, the team confirmed that it was investigating the matter with the assistance of a number of “leading security companies.”However, Atomic Wallet later downplayed the incident, stating that less than 1% of its monthly active users were affected. The project team was castigated by users for trying to present the hack as a minor incident. One user took to Twitter to call out the Atomic Wallet team for “having the nerve to come to the networks and say that only 1% of wallets were affected.”The Atomic Wallet project is based out of Tallinn, Estonia, having been founded in 2017. It claims to provide a non-custodial decentralized multi-currency crypto wallet. The product supports over fifty coins and two hundred tokens. It also offers atomic swaps between digital assets, while also supporting integrations with instant exchanges such as Changelly, ShapeShift, and others.Roland Säde, the Chief Marketing Officer of Atomic Wallet, assured users that the team is working tirelessly to recover the stolen funds. He emphasized the need to complete the investigation to develop a concrete plan.Despite the ongoing efforts, Säde urged victims to track the illicit transfers and report them to popular crypto exchanges. By doing so, it was thought that may hinder the scammers from exchanging the funds.Crypto hacking menaceLazarus Group hackers have been the bane of the crypto space in recent years. Elliptic released a report last month that identified Japan as having been the country most adversely affected by the North Korean hackers. It’s understood that the estimated $721 million in stolen crypto from Japan-based entities amounts to nearly nine times the value of North Korea’s exports based on 2021 data.While Atomic Wallet is directly reporting the incidents, Säde believes that having more individuals monitoring the hackers’ activities will make it more challenging for them to move the funds undetected. Unfortunately, Elliptic’s recent findings suggest that for many victims, it may already be too late to prevent further misuse of their stolen cryptocurrency.