NBC and AliPay collaborate to enable enhanced cross-border payments

The South Korean National Tax Service (NTS) is reportedly in the process of setting up virtual asset accounts for its district offices. This initiative is aimed at confiscating and liquidating the digital assets of individuals who fail to pay their taxes. This move comes after the creation of similar accounts by public prosecutors' offices, leading to speculation in the crypto industry that virtual asset accounts will soon be allowed for corporate entities as well.Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich on PexelsDirect confiscation of virtual assetsA report by the local news outlet Etoday today has revealed that each district office of the NTS is working towards establishing a virtual asset account. This development will empower the tax agency to directly sell virtual assets confiscated from tax delinquents. Previously, the NTS would freeze the accounts of overdue taxpayers at Korean cryptocurrency exchanges, compelling them to convert their assets into Korean won. These funds were then confiscated by the NTS. The new initiative is set to streamline the process, enabling the tax authority to directly confiscate virtual assets without the intermediary step of conversion to Korean won. Speaking about this development, an NTS officer said that as each district office director holds the authority to collect taxes from taxpayers with overdue payments, it's necessary for each office to have its own account. Prosecutors’ Offices’ Upbit and Bithumb accountsThe crypto industry views this development as a potential step towards allowing the creation of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities, starting with government agencies. In December, the prosecutors' offices established their entity accounts at major cryptocurrency exchanges Upbit and Bithumb. Since then, the prosecution has utilized these accounts to sell confiscated virtual assets, aiming to recover funds that had not been collected.  An official from a cryptocurrency exchange indicated that the South Korean government is currently focusing on allowing entities that serve the public good to own virtual asset accounts. This approach is seen as the starting point, with expectations that the trend will gain momentum in the future. The official added that it's rare for the government to provide blanket permissions from the outset, suggesting a gradual and cautious approach to the integration of virtual asset accounts.Money laundering concernsMeanwhile, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC), along with other financial regulators, has remained silent on the matter of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities. This reticence stems from concerns with the financial authority that the introduction of corporate crypto accounts could potentially lead to money laundering and the creation of slush funds. An official from the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee said that they have not received any comments from the financial authority in response to inquiries about plans to allow such accounts for corporate entities. The current law doesn’t prohibit corporate entities from trading virtual assets. However, under the auspices of the financial authority, banks have refrained from offering real-name accounts to corporate entities. This policy has been a point of contention within the crypto industry. Advocates argue that allowing corporate accounts could mitigate issues of market manipulation and challenge the dominance of Upbit in the Korean cryptocurrency market.  The official from the cryptocurrency exchange pointed out that the financial authority does not have a clear legal basis for prohibiting the creation of corporate crypto accounts. They suggested that the regulator should develop clearer guidelines and enforce these rules for corporate entities. More serious discussions in AprilMore serious discussions about the introduction of corporate crypto accounts are anticipated to take place in April, following the conclusion of the general election. Last month, the main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, made election promises to open the crypto market to institutional investors. Meanwhile, the ruling People Power Party has been quietly deliberating on virtual asset policy. Despite these political movements, earlier reports indicate a disconnect between the political parties' efforts to relax crypto regulations and the financial regulator's stance. Meanwhile, Hwang Seok-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs and Information Security, expects to see a conclusion on the permission of corporate crypto trading by the end of this year. He said that there has been ongoing discussion about the approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and that allowing the trading of such funds requires the ownership of virtual assets by institutions. 

Moomoo adds more cowbell with MAS license approvalMoomoo Financial Singapore has received in-principle approval for a major payment institution license from local regulator and central bank the Monetary Authority of Singapore.Photo by Zhu Hongzhi on UnsplashFirst stepThe milestone marks the firm’s first step on its journey towards full regulatory approval in the city-state. According to a report by The Straits Times, the company announced its licensing achievement on Wednesday, which makes it the first digital broker of its kind in Singapore to attain this initial licensing accreditation.With in-principle approval under its belt, Moomoo will work towards extending its crypto services to both retail and institutional investors within the country. The firm had been working towards licensing approval since May 2021 when it submitted its initial licensing application to the regulator.Currently, over a dozen firms covering various crypto-related trading activities, have obtained full licenses for digital payment token services in Singapore. In Moomoo’s case, the business markets itself as an all-in-one trading platform which includes a financial information app. Trading on the app is offered on a commission-free basis.Part of Moomoo’s strategy involves the promotion of financial inclusion, unlocking it through the use of innovative technologies. It’s with that intention that it is leaning heavily upon the use of artificial intelligence and big data, while incorporating a crypto trading product offering. Moomoo Singapore CEO Gavin Chia spoke to that approach recently, stating:“We will continue leveraging technology to deliver a unique investing experience, empowering investors to build their knowledge and refine their portfolios for a financially secure tomorrow, starting today.”Tencent backingIn light of this latest licensing success, Chia acknowledged the rising interest in digital payment token trading on their platform. Moomoo Singapore, a subsidiary of Nasdaq-listed Futu Holdings, was established in March 2021. Futu Holdings, in turn, is backed by Chinese tech giant Tencent, and it has positioned Moomoo Financial Singapore to play a significant role in the evolving cryptocurrency landscape within the region.Alongside Moomoo, Futu promotes its Futubull trading platform through its Chinese hub in Hong Kong. Last month, it emerged that subsidiary company PantherTrade, a Hong Kong-based entity, is in the process of preparing a license application in the Chinese autonomous territory.Singapore’s crypto potentialMoomoo Financial Singapore’s acquisition of in-principle approval is in anticipation of Singapore becoming a major cryptocurrency hub in Asia. This growth is attributed to the MAS’s efforts in establishing Singapore as a digital asset hub. Singapore’s crypto-friendly environment is demonstrated by a significant surge in cryptocurrency and blockchain investments, reaching $1.2 billion in 2022 compared to $109.75 million in 2020, according to Statista.In a survey conducted by Swiss crypto bank Sygnum involving more than 150 global institutional investors, those in Singapore showcased a tendency to view cryptocurrencies as a long-term investment. Additionally, Moomoo Financial Singapore highlighted a report by PwC Singapore and the Singapore Fintech Association, suggesting that the payments industry seems to be the most developed area within Singapore’s fintech landscape.As Singapore continues to embrace cryptocurrencies and blockchain, Moomoo Financial Singapore’s pending license adds to the expanding ecosystem, signaling a growing recognition of the importance of digital assets in the financial sector.

Korean Prosecutors Say Do Kwon and His Colleagues Knew Terra Was Unviable from the BeginningKorean prosecutors claimed that Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon and the key members behind the Terra-LUNA crash were aware of the project’s unviability from the beginning, according to a file issued by the Seoul Southern District Court.©Terraform LabsTerraform Labs founders misleading Korean investorsTerraform Labs founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin attracted 280,000 investors in Korea alone, claiming that the Terra stablecoin is a means of transaction, even though the company leaders had been notified by the financial authority that Terra-accepting businesses were impermissible. It is reported that during a search and seizure of the company, Korean prosecutors collected evidence that its employees shared such knowledge on their internal messaging system.Terra’s cross trading on crypto exchangesKnowing their cryptocurrency’s unviability, Terra executives registered its sister token LUNA for listing on major Korean crypto exchanges in May 2019. According to the Korean prosecution, they used a bot to create a trade volume of more than 800 million won in three domestic crypto exchanges by cross trading between 2019 and early last year.Cross trading is illegal in the stock market, as it is considered as an act of price manipulation, but LUNA was traded in crypto exchanges and it hasn’t been determined whether their token is a security or not. Under current Korean law, the court has to accept it as a security to punish those behind the Terra collapse.Shin’s denial of allegationsMeanwhile, Daniel Shin denied the prosecution’s allegations and argued that they had never received such a notice from the financial regulator.