Korean Prosecutors Say Do Kwon and His Colleagues Knew Terra Was Unviable from the Beginning

In a recent report, Circle Internet Financial, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, emphasized the growing adaptability of the Asian population towards digital currencies. This trend indicates a substantial potential for increased stablecoin usage in the Asia Pacific region. On Monday, the firm published "The State of the USDC Economy 2024 Report," providing a trove of relevant and timely data. Since its launch in 2018, the USDC stablecoin has facilitated over $12 trillion in blockchain transactions. The focus of the report is on the surge in remittances flowing into Asia, highlighting its growing presence. Remittances of $130 billion into AsiaAccording to a World Bank press release, remittances to Asia reached $130 billion in 2022, with the average cost of transferring $200 standing at 5.7% in the last quarter of the year. Meanwhile, the region accounted for 29% of all global digital asset value received, surpassing North America's 19% and Western Europe's 22%. Against this backdrop, the report sheds light on Circle's strategic partnership with Coins.ph, a crypto exchange in the Philippines, which aims to tap into the country's personal remittance demand, estimated at around $36 billion annually.  In another blog post, the company also dispels the notion that stablecoins are primarily used for speculative trading, citing a 90% decline in such activities over the past five years. This shift in usage patterns highlights the growing acceptance and adoption of stablecoins for practical applications like remittances and trade finance.Photo by Marjan Blan on UnsplashIncreasingly important role in trade financeImportantly, Circle asserts that USDC can play a role in closing the region's $510 billion trade finance gap. This gap represents the lack of liquidity available to companies for cross-border remittances and credit, particularly affecting emerging markets with capital outflow restrictions. The report underlines how businesses in these markets often struggle to secure funding for international trade, and USDC is emerging as a solution. One notable case study is Taipei-based XREX, which utilizes USDC to build financial pipelines between countries, leveraging the deep dollar liquidity in Taiwan to address the dollar scarcity in other Southeast Asian economies. This exemplifies how stablecoins like USDC are contributing to bridging financial gaps and facilitating international trade in regions with limited access to traditional banking services. Stablecoin-specific regulationThe regulatory landscape in the Asia-Pacific region is also evolving to accommodate stablecoins. Countries like Singapore, Hong Kong and Japan have implemented or proposed frameworks for stablecoin regulation, aligning with the growing importance of digital assets in the financial ecosystem. Circle has become increasingly active within the APAC region. In November, the firm joined forces with Japanese financial services conglomerate SBI Holdings to increase the circulation of USDC within Japan. Having been awarded a Major Payments Institution (MPI) license in Singapore in June, Circle followed that up later in the year by launching a zero-fee USDC minting facility within the city-state. Considering these developments, the Asia-Pacific region, with its large unbanked population and significant digital wallet usage, is predicted to witness quick adoption of stablecoins for cross-border payments.

Binance Headlines List of Japan FSA Warning Letter RecipientsJapan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) issued a warning letter on Friday stating that several foreign cryptocurrency exchanges have been operating in the country without proper registration, thereby infringing Japan’s fund settlement laws. The regulatory authority specifically named Binance, Bybit, MEXC Global, and Bitget as the entities in question.The FSA indicated that these exchanges need to register with the agency to continue operating in Japan. Failure to comply with the registration requirements would result in enforcement actions by the FSA, which could include the suspension of their operations in the country.©Pexels/David DibertUnregistered digital asset exchangesThe FSA’s warning letter detailed that the cryptocurrency exchanges mentioned had contravened Japan’s fund settlement regulations by engaging in crypto asset exchange operations without proper registration. The regulatory body emphasized that the current list of unregistered traders may not accurately reflect the current state of unregistered businesses in the country.The FSA intends to continue monitoring the market and taking appropriate regulatory measures to protect consumers and the integrity of the financial system. The agency also encouraged all unregistered operators to register with the FSA to avoid any possible enforcement actions.Clamping down on unregistered exchangesThe FSA’s recent action against unregistered cryptocurrency exchanges is in line with the regulatory body’s ongoing efforts to clamp down on non-compliant operators in Japan. In 2020, the FSA introduced new regulations mandating that all crypto exchanges must register with the agency and obtain a license to operate in the country. These regulations were put in place to strengthen consumer protection and enhance the transparency of the cryptocurrency market. By taking these measures, the FSA aims to foster a more stable and secure environment for the burgeoning crypto industry in Japan.The FSA’s warning to Binance is indicative of the growing regulatory scrutiny that the cryptocurrency industry in Japan and other nations is currently facing. Regulators are increasingly concerned about the potential risks associated with unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges, such as fraud, money laundering, and market manipulation. As a result, many regulatory bodies are implementing stricter rules and guidelines to promote transparency, accountability, and consumer protection in the cryptocurrency market.These regulations aim to create a more secure and reliable environment for investors and industry participants. The FSA’s actions against Binance serve as a reminder to all market players that compliance with regulatory requirements is critical for the long-term success of the cryptocurrency industry.Global regulatory variationWhile Japan is taking steps to implement new regulations for the cryptocurrency and Web3 sectors, the country has not been as stringent in its approach as some other major economies, such as the United States. However, this does not mean that regulators in Japan are not actively monitoring the industry and taking appropriate action where necessary.One example of such action is the recent lawsuit filed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission against the popular crypto exchange firm, Binance, and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, over regulatory violations. This highlights the fact that regulatory bodies in different parts of the world are taking a more proactive approach to monitoring the cryptocurrency industry.Moreover, the FSA in Japan issued a formal warning letter to Binance in 2021 for operating without the necessary permissions. This is an indication that the regulatory landscape in Japan is evolving, and that crypto exchanges must comply with the relevant regulations to avoid potential legal repercussions. While the severity of regulatory measures may differ across different jurisdictions, the message is clear: compliance is crucial for the long-term viability of the cryptocurrency industry.

Korea’s FSC Opposes Other Agencies’ Involvement in Virtual Asset BillAhead of the National Assembly’s passage of the virtual asset bill, the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has repeatedly opposed the involvement of the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in regulating cryptocurrencies, according to the Korean newspaper Kukmin Ilbo.©Pexels/LukasFSC’s oppositionIn a document submitted to the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee, the FSC opposed stipulating the BOK’s right to request documents in the virtual asset bill. The agency argued that the bill is indirectly related to the BOK’s monetary and credit policy and that explicitly mentioning monetary and credit policy in the bill could lead to the misinterpretation of virtual assets as possessing the characteristics of currencies.The FSC also objected to stipulating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises. According to law, the purpose of the FSC is to inspect and supervise financial institutions. Explicitly stating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises could cause confusion to the public that they are financial entities.However, there are growing concerns about the FSC’s perceived intention to dominate virtual asset jurisdiction.At a small meeting held under the National Policy Committee last month, Lawmaker Yoon Han-hong of the ruling People Power Party expressed the view that the FSC should consider incorporating the BOK and the FSS in the virtual asset bill for crypto regulations. During the meeting, the FSC objected to the inclusion of a stipulation that excludes central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) from the definition of virtual assets. Meanwhile, the BOK agreed to include such a stipulation.Allowing class action suitsAccording to an internal document obtained by Kukmin Ilbo, the FSC also intends to allow class action suits for crypto investors. It seeks to add cryptocurrencies to a bill proposed for class action suits, which also deal with securities. Class action suits provide a means for victims to receive redress in cases where a representative is successful in winning the lawsuit against the offender.The FSC stated that it will follow the majority on the issue of whether the purpose of the virtual asset bill should include the phrase “to contribute to the development of the nation’s economy,” although it left a cautionary note that some might raise objections to this, considering the speculative nature of virtual assets.