STELSI and Young Architects Forum Korea to host 38th Young Architects Forum in Seoul next week

Dubai Regulator Suspends BitOasis’ Crypto LicenseDubai’s pioneering cryptocurrency exchange, BitOasis, has had its operating license suspended by the city’s cryptocurrency regulator for failing to meet key conditions within the required timeframes. The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) took enforcement action against BitOasis and initiated a review of the Dubai-based firm.BitOasis was granted a conditional license on April 12, which allowed it to operate on the condition that it met specific requirements within 30 to 60 days. However, the exchange has failed to fulfill these conditions, leading to the suspension of its license. VARA did not disclose the exact nature of the unmet conditions, but it stated that until they are satisfied, BitOasis’ “License for Institutional and Qualified Retail Investors” will remain non-operational.Photo by iridial on UnsplashFirst MVP broker-dealer license holderBitOasis had received the first “minimum viable product operational license” from VARA, enabling it to offer broker-dealer services to qualified institutional and retail investors in Dubai. This license represents a crucial step towards obtaining a full market product (FMP) license, but as of now, no firm has been issued an FMP license by VARA.To become eligible for the FMP license, BitOasis must fulfill the conditions specified in its current license, as outlined by VARA. The regulatory authority has emphasized its commitment to monitoring the situation for compliance remediation.OPNX reprimandThis recent development follows VARA’s reprimand of Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the co-founders of the now-defunct crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital, in April. The duo had operated and promoted their new OPNX crypto exchange in Dubai without the necessary license, catching VARA’s attention.BitOasis addressed the regulatory concerns in a blog post on Tuesday, affirming its collaboration with VARA to meet the remaining conditions for the Operational MVP License. The exchange clarified that the issue with its license does not impact other services provided, such as broker-dealer services for existing retail users. It also took to Twitter on Tuesday to clarify the situation. The company has suspended new user registrations until further notice, presumably as it works towards meeting VARAs licensing requirements.BitOasis stated: “You can continue to use BitOasis with the assurance that your assets are safe, secure, and held at their full value on our platform, and our team will continue to cooperate with the Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority and fulfill all post-operational license terms, as well as working towards a full market product license.”The firm referred to the “unique challenges” that are associated with licensing and suggested that it is determined to address them and to “be a leader in the virtual assets sector.”The suspension of BitOasis’ license highlights the stringent regulatory environment in Dubai’s cryptocurrency sector. VARA is demonstrating that it remains committed to enforcing compliance and ensuring that crypto exchanges meet the necessary requirements. BitOasis must rectify the issues and meet the conditions of its license to regain its operational status and proceed towards obtaining the coveted full market product license in the future.

The Philippines Forging Crypto Reg. Path US Could Learn FromThe Philippines has demonstrated best practice in operating a sensible regulatory framework relative to cryptocurrency while the United States has erred by engaging in regulation via enforcement while responding after the horse has bolted in relation to a string of crypto company collapses. That’s according to Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph.©Unsplash/C BuezaIn an opinion piece published in Forkcast News on Tuesday, De Guzman lays out his view as to what’s required in terms of regulation, while drawing comparisons between the application of regulation relative to crypto in both jurisdictions.The need for “sensible” regulationDe Guzman believes that the crypto industry’s recent failures are a wake-up call for the whole sector. Losses of billions of dollars affected Celsius Network, BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Genesis, and FTX, and led to Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Signature banks’ collapse in a week. To maintain consumers’ trust, he believes that sensible regulation is necessary for the crypto exchanges dealing with digital assets.The legal compliance expert cites the FTX collapse. FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire was among the largest collapses. FTX pretended to support regulation, but its true nature was an offshore exchange for global clients. Nonetheless, some businesses act on their regulation support by acquiring licenses and complying with central bank audits in the countries of operation.State-level and industry-level regulationThe crypto industry being open to self regulation is one element of the solution, he says. Regulators must proactively protect their consumers from scams and business failures, not just clean up the mess after millions of people have been harmed.Regulatory failuresDe Guzman points the finger at reactionary regulatory action. Regulators filed charges against crypto industry founders after their collapse. Previously, they missed the problems of the largest companies. FTX, based in the Bahamas, was mismanaged, and American regulators only responded after customer issues. Regulations by enforcement, preferred in several countries, wait for failure to happen before taking action. Over-regulation through enforcement pushes platforms offshore, where Wild West-type environments thrive, with clear consequences.Regulators in some countries focus on surface-level questions, like which tokens should be considered securities, while others, like in the Philippines, prioritize execution-level details to protect consumers. Anti-money laundering measures and custody are core issues, with the G-7’s Financial Action Task Force’s Travel Rule likely to be more strictly applied. Active regulation and audits are needed to ensure financial platforms act responsibly with customer deposits. Basic rules need to be put in place through a licensing regime, followed by regulation of market practices like commingling of assets, self-dealing, and trading against customers.The Philippines sensible approach to regulationThe Coins.ph legal guru holds out his home country as exemplary in terms of its approach to regulation. The Philippines’ regulatory regime requires a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license to operate a crypto exchange, as well as additional licenses for other services. The country’s central bank, BSP, directly regulates all crypto exchanges and expands its crypto regulations to adapt to market needs. KYC processes in the Philippines require recognition of valid ID documents from across 82 provinces.Additionally, the BSP expects the industry to cooperate in quarterly audits where they share balance sheet information and disclose digital assets in hot and cold wallets. Regulators in the Philippines are proactive and knowledgeable about the crypto space, which sets a sensible framework based on customer protection.

Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX), the city-state’s primary asset exchange, is in the process of establishing Bitcoin perpetual futures trading on the platform.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashInstitutional product offeringAccording to a report published by Bloomberg earlier this week, the exchange platform intends to launch Bitcoin futures sometime during H2 2025. The product launch will be subject to regulatory approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). A spokesperson for the company told Bloomberg that the product offering will be geared exclusively towards institutional investors and traders in an effort to “significantly expand institutional market access.” Retail access to the product will be prohibited. Once launched, these Bitcoin perpetual futures contracts, being offered through a traditional finance (TradFi) outfit like SGX, will help to blur the lines between TradFi and the emerging crypto sector. Perpetual futures have no expiry date. They offer a means for traders to bet on price changes in an underlying asset while doing away with the need to take ownership of the asset itself. Cautious approachSGX has been cautious in listing crypto assets and derivative products. Last year the firm’s CEO, Loh Boon Chye, said that the time was not yet right for such listings.  His concern back then was that any such product launches would need “sustainable ecosystem support,” adding that “that means demand, that means governance, that means structure.” While spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) had been approved in the United States at that point, there has been much further development in the crypto-sphere since then, following the election of a pro-crypto administration in the U.S. That event has had knock-on effects globally. Singapore’s SGX isn’t the only traditional exchange platform to respond. Japanese futures exchange, the Osaka Dojima Exchange (ODEX), is gearing up to file an application with the Financial Services Agency (FSA) to list a Bitcoin futures product later this month. Closer to home, an American digital asset marketplace that focuses on institutional trading, EDX Markets, has plans to introduce Bitcoin perpetual futures products to the Singaporean market, according to a report which emerged in January. In May 2024, EDX launched EDXM Global, a settlement platform, in Singapore. This product launch by SGX serves the purposes of decision-makers in Singapore, who have been trying to position the city-state as a digital asset industry hub. Additionally, the move will bring greater acceptance of the digital assets sector from traditional market participants. Crypto perpetual futures contracts were first pioneered by crypto derivatives exchanges like BitMEX back in 2016. Since then, other crypto-native platforms like Binance and OKX have offered these products. In the case of unregulated offshore exchanges, the products have proven to be controversial, as at times, they have been used in a manner that has exposed market participants to counterparty risk. Failed crypto exchange FTX, together with its sister company Alameda Research, relied on the products in their trading activities. SGX, as a seasoned, regulated TradFi operator, which holds an Aa2 rating from Moody’s, is likely to prove to be a more palatable option for institutional players.