MANTRA snags VASP license in Dubai

While cryptocurrencies may be banned in China, crypto trading activity continues in some corners, nonetheless, sometimes through accessing overseas exchanges. With that, authorities recently uncovered a massive underground banking operation that exploited crypto trading platforms to evade local forex regulations.Photo by Manuel Joseph on Pexels$2.2 billion laundering operationOn Sunday, an account on popular Chinese social media platform WeChat run by China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) published details of the $2.2 billion laundering operation bust. Xu Xiao, the Inspector at the Qingdao Branch of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, revealed that the scheme involved underground banks who purchased virtual currencies and then sold the virtual currencies through overseas trading platforms to obtain the foreign currency they needed. This process, he explained, completes the conversion of yuan and foreign currencies, constituting the illegal act of buying and selling foreign exchange. Stringent capital controlsChina enforces stringent rules on money transfers outside the country. Citizens are limited to exchanging up to $50,000 in foreign currency and require a permit for transactions beyond that limit. Any transaction exceeding the limit without a permit is considered money laundering. During a recent investigation, authorities seized cryptocurrencies valued at approximately $28,000 in Tether, Litecoin and other digital currencies. However, the operation is estimated to have facilitated the movement of over $2.2 billion, involving more than a thousand bank accounts across 17 provinces and municipalities. Monetary control loopholesChina, once the largest cryptocurrency market, imposed a comprehensive ban on crypto exchanges in September 2017 and subsequently expanded its restrictions to include crypto mining and trading. Despite these measures, reports have surfaced about underground crypto exchange operations. Earlier this year, an investigative report by the Wall Street Journal found that global exchange Binance continues to do thriving business with Chinese customers. Global crypto exchanges are reportedly still onboarding Chinese clients indirectly. The South China Morning Post (SCMP) recently accused Binance of facilitating Chinese crypto trading accounts by falsely claiming they are from Taiwan. While mainland China adopts a hostile stance towards cryptocurrencies, the special administrative region of Hong Kong remains progressive in the sector. Hong Kong’s regulatory authorities have introduced specific rules for cryptocurrencies and are licensing crypto exchanges operating within the jurisdiction. Arthur Hayes, the co-founder of the BitMEX crypto derivatives platform, recently described Hong Kong as the gateway for mainland China to global capital markets. Hayes asserted that wealthy Chinese individuals all bank in Hong Kong and with that, they all have access to crypto exchanges and brokers. In Cambodia, it is understood that illicit Chinese-linked activities oftentimes implicate the use of U.S. dollar stablecoin Tether (USDT) to move funds in and out of China even though Tether is banned in Cambodia. The latest crackdown in China underscores the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in controlling crypto-related activities, highlighting the dynamic nature of such activity within and adjacent to mainland China. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, the contrast between mainland China’s approach and Hong Kong’s more open stance toward cryptocurrencies becomes increasingly evident. 

Suspects emerge in Taiwan in ongoing JPEX scandal falloutIn the ongoing saga surrounding the collapse of Dubai-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange JPEX, Taiwanese prosecutors have identified new suspects, marking a significant development in the case.The Taipei District Prosecutors Office (TDPO) has requested the custody of Chang Tung-ying, chief partner at JPEX’s Taiwan office, over allegations of fraud. That’s according to a report by local TV channel TVBS News on Thursday.Photo by Ricky Zeng on UnsplashMoney laundering and Banking Act violationsThis latest development brings a new twist to the scandal, which has largely been playing out in the Chinese territory of Hong Kong. The TDPO reportedly conducted searches at nine locations linked to the JPEX investigation. Chang, along with three other individuals, including JPEX lecturer Shih Yu-sheng (also known as Shi Yu), was summoned by the authorities. Chang and Shih are being investigated for violations of the Banking Act and the Money Laundering Control Act.During the investigation, JPEX salespersons Liu Chien-fu and Niu Keng-sheng were released, with Liu being granted bail of 50,000 New Taiwan dollars ($1,550). Niu, the registered person in charge of JPEX Taiwan, was released after questioning.Celebrity promoter focusThe report also revealed that Nine Chen, a Taiwanese celebrity and singer who previously served as a brand ambassador for JPEX, was summoned by prosecutors. He has cooperated with law enforcement in the role of a witness to the alleged fraud who has testified to illicit activity carried out by the platform. However, it is now understood that recent events have developed such that Chen is now being treated as a defendant.This action resonates with actions taken by the authorities in Hong Kong some weeks ago in the earlier stages of investigation into this affair. In September, one of the first actions taken by Hong Kong law enforcement was the arrest and detention of social media influencer and former lawyer Joseph Lam, known to followers as “Jolamchok” on the Instagram platform.Alleged liquidity crisisJPEX, once a successful crypto exchange, abruptly halted some services in mid-September, citing a liquidity crisis triggered by alleged “unfair treatment” from institutions in Hong Kong. The sudden implosion led to accusations of misleading investors regarding the application for a crypto trading license and other issues.The scandal surrounding JPEX has escalated into a major industry concern, prompting investigations by Hong Kong authorities. Over 2,000 complaints from JPEX users, reporting losses of nearly $180 million, have triggered significant regulatory attention.As investigations progressed in Hong Kong, the authorities took the decision to block access to the platform, with the platform responding by advising customers to circumvent this restriction through the use of a virtual private network (VPN).As of September 25, law enforcement has arrested at least 11 alleged suspects in the JPEX case, while the alleged masterminds remain at large. At that time, Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) pledged to renew its efforts to combat unregulated crypto platforms in Hong Kong.A survey conducted by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) business school has indicated that the affair has had a negative impact on public sentiment towards crypto more recently.

Rising Cryptocurrency Arbitrage Transactions Raise Concerns in South KoreaThe number of arbitrage transactions between South Korean and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges has been experiencing a notable uptick, according to a report by local media outlet Maeil Business Newspaper.In recent developments, foreign actors engaging in price manipulation have been transferring substantial amounts of cryptocurrency assets to Korean exchanges, driving up prices. Subsequently, they transfer these tokens from Korean exchanges back to overseas platforms, capitalizing on the price discrepancies to generate profits.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashBithumb’s case in H1According to documents submitted to Kim Hee-gon, a member of the ruling political party People Power Party, on Monday, KRW 3.4 trillion ($2.6 billion) worth of tokens were moved from Bithumb, a leading Korean cryptocurrency exchange, to foreign trading platforms during the first half of this year. Although this figure marks a 40% decrease compared to H1 2022’s KRW 5.7 trillion, primarily due to the significant decline in token prices across the cryptocurrency market, it’s noteworthy that the number of transactions has seen a significant increase.Other exchangesGopax, another major exchange in the nation, recorded token outflows totaling KRW 12.3 billion. On the other hand, Upbit, Coinone, and Korbit, which are also prominent exchanges, declined to provide data due to reasons like confidentiality concerns. However, given that Upbit holds an 82.0% share of the Korean crypto market, nearly four times larger than Bithumb’s share (14.2%), it is suspected that the volume of tokens transferred from Upbit to foreign platforms would likely have followed a similar proportion.While the value of tokens sent from Bithumb to overseas operators saw a year-over-year decrease, the number of transactions surged to 231,302, nearly doubling the figure of H1 2022’s 124,048 transactions. The average transaction size was KRW 14.7 million.Even though the overall enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies might have cooled off since last year, the spike in the number of transactions suggests that there’s been a surge in arbitrage trading between Korea and foreign markets.Kimchi premiumEarlier this month, a significant transaction caught the eye of cryptocurrency market observers in South Korea. On September 1, crypto data analytics firm Arkham identified that 170,000 CyberConnect (CYBER) tokens were transferred to Bithumb from a crypto wallet thought to be owned by DWF Labs, a firm specializing in cryptocurrency trading and investment. The timing of the transaction coincides with a period during which the Kimchi premium for CYBER exceeded 100%. The Kimchi premium refers to the crypto price gap between Korean exchanges and their foreign counterparts.The complicating factor here is that DWF Labs is a foreign entity that is managed by a foreign team.The use of corporate accounts is virtually prohibited in the Korean crypto market. The Travel Rule mandates that any transfers of tokens between Korean and international exchanges must go through accounts that have been verified under Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines. Given these regulations, there are growing suspicions within the crypto community that foreign venture capitalists may have used accounts in borrowed names to conduct sales on Korean exchanges, which are restricted to Korean citizens. However, it’s worth noting that there is currently no legal basis for taking punitive action even if borrowed-name accounts were indeed used.Lawmaker Kim commented on the limitations of current financial regulations aimed at preventing money laundering in the cryptocurrency market. Despite efforts by financial authorities, including the introduction of the Travel Rule, Kim stated that these measures have not been very effective. He emphasized the urgency of enhancing the regulatory framework to curb potential illicit activities involving cryptocurrencies, such as those exploiting market arbitrage opportunities.