Sleek Secures $5M seed funding to propel Web3 social networking offering

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

Acquisition by SBI Subsidiary Part of European ExpansionB2C2, a cryptocurrency liquidity provider catering to institutional clients and a subsidiary company of Japanese financial services conglomerate SBI Holdings, has solidified its foothold in the digital assets market by completing the acquisition of Woorton, a prominent European market maker and over-the-counter (OTC) transaction specialist.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashMarket expansionIn a press release published to its website on Thursday, UK-based B2C2 outlined further details relative to the acquisition. The move represents an effort by B2C2 to broaden its client base and expand within the European market, ahead of the forthcoming regulations under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).The acquisition opens doors for B2C2 to extend its services within the European Union (EU) jurisdiction. Additionally, it allows B2C2 to tap into growth opportunities beyond its existing strongholds in the United Kingdom, Asia-Pacific (APAC), and the United States.Licensing accessOne of the prime advantages of this acquisition is B2C2’s access to Woorton’s prestataires de services sur actifs numériques (PSAN) license, which is regulated by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), the French financial regulatory authority. This license empowers B2C2 to operate seamlessly within the EU, positioning the company for a strategic advantage in the evolving regulatory landscape.As the UK is no longer part of the EU, this acquisition makes for a much easier entry point for the company into the broader European market.Founded in 2017, Woorton boasts an active clientele of nearly 250 entities engaged in trading 96 different cryptocurrencies. The company distinguishes itself by offering round-the-clock liquidity provision, ensuring uninterrupted trading opportunities for its clients.Woorton’s engagement with regulatory bodies is a key highlight, and the firm is a co-founding member of the Association for the Development of Crypto-Assets (ADAN). Through ADAN, Woorton actively contributes to shaping regulatory frameworks governing digital assets in France, bridging the gap between the industry and policymakers.Additionally, the company played a crucial role in establishing Paris Blockchain Week, an internationally recognized event that brings together thousands of attendees and speakers to discuss blockchain and digital asset trends.Charlie Meraud, CEO of Woorton, expressed excitement about the acquisition, emphasizing the complementary strengths of the two firms. Meraud highlighted the enhanced liquidity pool and improved market presence that the combined platform would offer to customers, ultimately leading to a superior liquidity and trading experience.B2C2’s CEO, Nicola White, described the acquisition as a significant milestone in the company’s growth journey. White expressed enthusiasm about the potential the acquisition unlocks for B2C2 and its EU-based clients, reaffirming the importance of regulatory standing and a robust client base.London baseEstablished in 2015 and primarily owned by SBI, B2C2 operates from its main headquarters in the UK, with operational offices in the US and Japan. Its UK-registered company B2C2 Ltd serves as the parent entity within the B2C2 group of companies.B2C2’s acquisition of Woorton not only enhances its presence within the European Union but also serves to demonstrate its intent in terms of regulatory compliance and industry leadership. This strategic move positions the company to navigate the evolving crypto market, likely leading to greater opportunities for its clients.

Singapore High Court Recognizes Cryptocurrency as Personal PropertyIn a significant ruling on July 25, Judge Philip Jeyaretnam of the High Court of Singapore declared that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and should be recognized as property.The judge’s decision came in response to a case brought by Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit against its former employee, Ho Kai Xin, who was accused of transferring approximately 4.2 million Tether (USDT) from the crypto exchange to her private accounts without authorization.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashNo fundamental differenceIn his ruling, Judge Jeyaretnam emphasized that there is no fundamental difference between cryptocurrencies, fiat money, or even physical objects like shells when it comes to their status as property. He argued that as long as these objects hold value and are based on mutual faith, they can be considered property. The judge’s verdict is seen as a crucial step in establishing the legal status of digital assets within the Singaporean jurisdiction.Addressing the argument that cryptocurrencies lack physical presence and therefore cannot be considered property, Judge Jeyaretnam drew an analogy, stating: “We identify what is going on as a particular digital token, somewhat like how we give a name to a river even though the water contained within its banks is constantly changing.” By equating cryptocurrencies to named entities, the judge made it clear that physical tangibility is not a prerequisite for something to be classified as property.Cryptocurrencies have valueFurthermore, the ruling challenges the perception that cryptocurrencies have no “real” value. Judge Jeyaretnam firmly refuted this notion, highlighting that the value of any asset, whether physical or digital, is ultimately determined by collective human belief and judgment.One critical classification made by the judge is grouping cryptocurrencies under the category of “things in action” within British common law. This categorization means that cryptocurrencies are considered a form of property, over which personal rights can be claimed and enforced through legal actions, rather than requiring physical possession.The judge’s decision also referenced the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation paper, which proposes implementing segregation and custody requirements for digital payment tokens. By taking cues from the MAS’s stance on digital assets, the court emphasized the legality of holding cryptocurrencies on trust, as long as practical methods for identification and segregation are in place.Cues taken from existing lawSingapore’s legal framework for property also played a crucial role in the ruling. Judge Jeyaretnam pointed to Order 22 of Singapore’s Rules of Court 2021, which defines “movable property” to include various assets, such as cash, debts, bonds, shares, and cryptocurrency or other digital currency. This inclusion reinforces the recognition of cryptocurrencies as a valid form of property within Singaporean law.In April of this year, a Hong Kong court reached a similar conclusion, recognizing cryptocurrency as property. In the High Court of Justice in London the following month, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) were recognized as “private property.”Overall, Judge Jeyaretnam’s ruling represents a significant milestone in the legal recognition of cryptocurrencies in Singapore. By acknowledging cryptocurrencies as property, the court provides greater clarity and certainty for crypto users and investors while affirming the importance of embracing digital assets within the nation’s legal framework.