Binance and Gulf Energy launch digital asset exchange in Thailand

Korean crypto firms relocating for cheaper rent amid prolonged crypto winterAs the prolonged crypto winter continues to affect the industry, blockchain and cryptocurrency firms in South Korea are under pressure to economize. Faced with a deteriorating business and investment climate, numerous companies are reducing their office space and relocating to areas with cheaper rent, according to a Wednesday (local time) report by local media outlet Bizwatch.Photo by Nastuh Abootalebi on UnsplashReducing operating costsBizwatch reported, citing industry sources, that Parameta (previously Iconloop), a blockchain enterprise, has relocated its headquarters from Seoul’s upscale Signature Towers to a more economical shared office space this year. This strategic move is interpreted as an effort to slash operating costs by choosing a location with significantly lower rental expenses. A Parameta representative confirmed that the relocation was part of measures to reduce costs.Binance-backed Streami, which runs the Gopax cryptocurrency exchange, is also reportedly contemplating an office relocation after downsizing its staff. The company’s workforce has dwindled from over 100 employees earlier in the year to approximately 60 by September. A Streami spokesperson has indicated that they have yet to reach a decision regarding the relocation. Streami’s situation is particularly significant due to its ongoing challenges in securing approval from financial regulators for changes to its executive representatives since Binance acquired a majority stake. Recently, Streami appointed a new CEO from the domestic tech firm CityLabs, which has also purchased an 8.55% stake in Streami and intends to further increase its investment in the exchange operator.Similarly, Korea Digital Exchange, the operator of cryptocurrency-only exchange Flybit, has listed for sale one of its two floors of office space in Seoul’s Seocho district. This move comes nearly a year and eight months after the company expanded into the current premises.Changes in workforce sizesBefore the crypto winter, when the Korean crypto market witnessed unprecedented growth, numerous companies expanded their offices to make room for the growing workforce, bolstered by rising revenues. For instance, Dunamu, which runs Upbit — Korea’s largest crypto exchange — garnered attention for acquiring pricey real estate in Gangnam to construct a new office.However, the boom was short-lived. With the onset of the crypto downturn, numerous companies found themselves having to shut down. Blockchain technology firms are facing similar challenges, with many developers steering away from the sector due to persisting market instability. For many of these firms, the workforce has diminished as they’ve either undergone restructuring or struggled to recruit replacements for departing employees.An industry insider remarked that reducing operating costs is a logical step for companies facing a lack of investment and revenue. They noted that this only applies to those resilient enough to weather the hardship, adding that many cryptocurrency-only exchanges are likely to shut down completely in these challenging conditions.In fact, Cashierest, a crypto-only exchange, recently announced the cease of operations. Concerns about the company had been growing after staff layoffs and the departure of its CEO in July. A thorough analysis by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) found that, of the 21 Korean crypto-only exchanges, 18 are operating with negative shareholder equity as of the first half of this year. Moreover, 10 did not earn any revenue from transaction fees during the same period.Crypto-only exchanges typically see lower trading volumes as they cannot facilitate trades in Korean won. In South Korea, only five trading platforms — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax — are officially registered with the financial regulator to conduct fiat-to-crypto transactions.

INDODAX, Indonesia’s largest virtual asset trading platform by trading volume, has acquired full licensing in Indonesia from the local regulator. That’s according to a report published by local media outlet VOI. The license, a Physical Crypto Asset Trader (PFAK) license, has been awarded to the company by Indonesia’s Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency, better known as BAPPEBTI.  The license will place INDODAX in a complaint position within the Indonesian market, relative to local regulations. The business has been issued certificate number 10/BAPPEBTI/PFAK/12/2024 by the regulator, its approval certificate as a Physical Crypto Asset Trader.Photo by Mark König on UnsplashMandatory registration requirementIn December 2023 the authorities in Indonesia set out a mandatory requirement for crypto trading entities to register with the Commodity Future Exchange (CFX). CFX is Indonesia’s national crypto bourse, while INDODAX is a member. As of April 2024, 35 crypto exchanges had been registered with the regulator. CFX has been given the mandate to monitor crypto exchange operations, to safeguard investors by ensuring exchanges abide by local regulations. Fendy Tan, chief financial officer (CFO) at INDODAX commented on the firm’s recent licensing milestone, stating: "We are grateful to BAPPEBTI and CFX for the trust given through this full license. The long process that must be passed reflects our commitment to providing the best protection for users. The license number 10 also has a special meaning, which symbolizes perfection, and symbolizes the 10-year journey of INDODAX in leading the crypto industry in Indonesia."  Liquidity and SOP requirementsIn order to acquire this license INDODAX had to comply with BAPPEBTI Regulation Number 8 of 2021 and Number 13 of 2022. It has also had to ensure a minimum paid-up capital of 100 billion Indonesian Rupiahs ($6,158,000), and a minimum equity of IDR 50 billion ($3,079,000). Furthermore, the company has had to implement a set of standard operating procedures (SOPs), together with achieving ISO certification in accordance with global security standards, with specific emphasis on complying with regulations to safeguard customer funds according to the balances held on account of fiat currency and digital assets by INDODAX customers. INDODAX is understood to have 7.1 million customers while a transaction volume of 109 trillion Indonesian rupiahs was reached for the period January to November 2024. BAPPEBTI had extended a deadline for the crypto licensing of exchanges late last year, a move welcomed at the time by INDODAX CEO Oscar Darmawan. Darmawan said that the move would strengthen the industry by ensuring that market participants were compliant with recently introduced regulations. While this licensing milestone is a positive for INDODAX, the firm had faced challenges in 2024. In September it emerged that the platform had been compromised with the loss of around $18 million in digital assets. Meanwhile, the authorities in Indonesia had planned to switch crypto market oversight from BAPPEBTI to the Financial Services Authority (OJK) by Jan. 12. However, a recent report published by the Jakarta Globe suggests that the Indonesian government has yet to finalize this regulatory transfer.

Polymarket activity under scrutiny in Taiwan due to election contractsTaiwanese law enforcement is currently delving into the activities of online influencers and community members promoting Polymarket contracts related to the upcoming presidential election which is due to be held on Jan. 13.Polymarket is a New York-based Ethereum-centric prediction market. The platform runs on the Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution network Polygon. The project invites platform users to bet on the outcomes of a broad spectrum of events, ranging from politics to entertainment.Users deposit USDC stablecoin, choose an event to bet on and purchase “outcome shares” through USDC. The user has the ability to trade those shares anytime before the resolution of the contract.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashPossible election law violationsThe Taiwanese investigation came to light in a report by Taiwan-based crypto publication BlockTempo, which was published last week. The investigation comes as concerns arose about potential violations of Taiwan’s Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act, which explicitly prohibits gambling on election outcomes.Multiple influencers and crypto community members have reportedly been subpoenaed for their involvement in Polymarket contracts, allowing users to place bets on the January election. At present, the betting pool for the election holds over $300,000, with a market prediction favoring the Democratic Progressive Party’s Lai Ching-te, also known as William Lai, with a 78% chance of winning.However, the legality of such betting activities is in question under Article 88–1 of Taiwan’s election law. It stipulates that anyone gambling on the outcome of an election or recall in a public place or a place open to the public may face imprisonment, short-term detention or a fine of up to NT$100,000 ($3,196.85).Sherman Lin, an attorney at Taipei-based Lin & Partners, emphasized the seriousness with which law enforcement views gambling activities related to presidential elections in Taiwan. He explained that broad legal interpretations under the Presidential Election and Recall Act have led to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators targeting Taiwanese gamblers. Lin stated:“Law enforcement agencies in Taiwan are vigilant in investigating any gambling activities related to presidential elections.”“Broad legal interpretations have been applied to gambling crimes under the Presidential Election and Recall Act, leading to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators in Taiwan targeting Taiwanese gamblers,” he added.Prohibited in United StatesComparing the situation to the United States, where gambling on election outcomes is illegal in most states, Lin noted that enforcing such regulations often falls under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Polymarket’s Terms of Use explicitly prohibit usage by U.S. persons.Despite potential legal consequences for gambling activities in Taiwan, including participation, promotion and platform hosting for betting pools like Polymarket, Lin pointed out that enforcing actions against overseas entities poses jurisdictional challenges. Taiwan’s legal reach is primarily limited to domestic actors, creating complexities in addressing decentralized platforms like Polymarket.Lin suggested that law enforcement may focus on online influencers who promoted the Polymarket contract, as seen in previous cases involving the collapse of the unlicensed crypto exchange JPEX in Hong Kong.Moreover, while there are legal precedents for pursuing centralized entities organizing election gambling, Lin highlighted that no established legal precedent in Taiwan currently exists for decentralized platforms organizing election betting.