Aptos charts success in South Korea through bridging Web2 and Web3

3AC Co-Founder Disputes US Jurisdiction Citing Singaporean CitizenshipKyle Davies, the Co-Founder of the failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), has asserted that he is solely a citizen of Singapore and not of the United States.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on PexelsEvading pursuit of damagesThe assertion may have relevance as it may mean that Davies can evade actions taken against him in a US court on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction. In a recent filing with the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), Davies presented documents demonstrating that he had renounced his US citizenship in December 2020. He emphasized that he obtained citizenship in Singapore after being issued a passport in early 2021 and that he does not subject himself to the jurisdiction of US courts.$3.5 billion owedIn June it emerged that liquidators appointed for 3AC were seeking to recover $1.3 billion from the fund’s co-founders, Davies and Su Zhu. The firm reportedly owes creditors a staggering $3.5 billion.In the midst of public criticism surrounding the events leading to 3AC’s collapse, Zhu and Davies launched a platform called Open Exchange (OPNX), allowing trading claims against bankrupt crypto firms. Despite a deficit of goodwill for the duo in the crypto sector, they have been putting all their energies into the new venture.Last month, they outlined that they would donate future earnings from OPNX to 3AC creditors. It’s difficult to reconcile that claim when with this action, Davies is trying to evade contributing to creditors via the 3AC bankruptcy process and this legal action taken by the liquidator.Renounced citizenshipAccording to court documents, Davies officially renounced his US citizenship at the US Embassy in Singapore, citing his decision to reside in the country on a long-term basis. He revealed that he got married to a Singaporean national in 2017 and subsequently gained permanent residency in Singapore. Because Singapore does not permit dual nationality, Davies chose to renounce his US citizenship to establish himself fully as a Singaporean citizen.The submission of these documents came after 3AC’s liquidators requested a subpoena to gather information on the crypto hedge fund’s collapse. Both Kyle Davies and Zhu, were subpoenaed on Twitter, as their whereabouts were unknown. However, while Zhu, being a Singaporean national, might not be subject to the subpoena while residing outside the United States, Davies’ refusal to comply with the order led to discussions about holding him in contempt of court.In response to the subpoena controversy, Davies’ legal representatives claimed that he cannot be validly served with process as a non-party in the case, as he has not been a US citizen or resident since well before the case was initiated. They stated that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over him due to his renunciation of US citizenship. Accordingly, they requested that the Service Order and Compel Order, which were based on the assumption that Davies was a US citizen, be vacated.

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto fundsRoger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash$8 million disputeThe crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocenceRoger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.Matrixport standing firmWhile Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”

With reports of American exchange platform Coinbase having been in talks with regulators to re-enter the Indian market emerging last month, the firm has made further progress with those efforts, registering with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). In a blog post published to the Coinbase website on March 11, the company confirmed that it had successfully registered with the FIU, a national agency which is responsible for gathering, processing, analyzing and circulating data related to suspicious financial transactions.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashOffering retail services in 2025As a consequence of this registration, the company intends to commence trading activity in India once more, with plans to offer retail services to Indian investors later this year. Commenting on the development, John O'Loghlen, Regional Managing Director for the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region at Coinbase, stated that the company is committed to building its business in markets where potential exists for crypto and on-chain innovation. He added: “India represents one of the most exciting market opportunities in the world today, and we’re proud to deepen our investment here in full compliance with local regulations.” News of this development has been interpreted as a positive for the crypto sector. Taking to X, Suraj Chawla, founder and CEO of GPU.net, a decentralized network of GPUs, suggested that the registration was indicative of a softening in the regulatory approach taken to crypto in India. He believes that the Trump administration in the U.S., which is pro-crypto, is collaborating with India’s government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He added: “This is extremely positive news with countries like UAE, IND, RUS, USA adopting mainstream crypto and working on critical infra like exchanges, ETF and stablecoins.” Taking this development as a sign of a crypto awakening in India, Chawla suggested that we could see major Indian corporations like Reliance, Tata and Adani going into mainstream crypto infrastructure. ‘Informal pressure’Coinbase was forced to disable UPI payments on its platform in India back in 2022 due to what Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong described at the time as “informal pressure” from India’s central bank, the Royal Bank of India (RBI). Armstrong offered the following take on the status of crypto in India at that time:“India is a unique market in the sense that the Supreme Court has ruled that they can't ban crypto, but there are elements in the government there, including at the Reserve Bank of India, who don't seem to be as positive on it.” In 2023 the company disabled new user sign-ups on its platform.  India’s central bank has leaned against crypto over the last few years. In January of last year, RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das, said that there was no place in India for “crypto mania,” following the approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds in the U.S. He said at that time that "the way we look at crypto remains unchanged, irrespective of who does what."  While taking what has been at best an ambiguous approach to cryptocurrencies, the RBI has advocated for the adoption of blockchain technology by India’s banks.