SC Ventures cues up $100M crypto startup investment vehicle in UAE

Binance Thriving in China Despite Crypto BanWhen China cracked down on cryptocurrency trading in 2021, it seemed like Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, would have to leave the country behind. However, nearly two years later, an investigative report carried out by the Wall Street Journal finds that business is thriving for Binance in China.Photo by Hanson Lu on Unsplash$90 billion in monthly tradingThe report, which was published on Wednesday, reveals that users managed to trade a staggering $90 billion worth of cryptocurrency-related assets in China within just one month.Internal data, shared with The Wall Street Journal and corroborated by current and former employees, unveils this underground activity. Remarkably, these transactions propelled China to become Binance’s largest market, accounting for a massive 20% of global trading volume, excluding trades by a subset of major traders.Almost one million active Chinese usersDespite the supposed ban, Binance’s internal discussions highlight the pivotal role China still plays for the exchange. Current and former employees indicate that Binance’s investigations team collaborates closely with Chinese law enforcement. This partnership aims to identify potential criminal activities among the 900,000+ active users in China, underscoring Binance’s efforts to maintain oversight.However, Binance now faces regulatory challenges tied to its secretive global operations. In June, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Binance and its Founder, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), alleging illegal operations and misuse of customer funds.Meanwhile, the Justice Department is conducting its own investigation. A report by Semafor on Wednesday suggests that authorities are considering fraud charges but they’re concerned that such an eventuality may lead to a run on the exchange. This regulatory onslaught has seen Binance’s market share among US users plummet, leading to a reduction of over 1,000 jobs out of its 8,000-strong workforce.Circumventing regulationThe clandestine existence of Binance’s footprint in China offers insights into the exchange’s ability to function surreptitiously in unwelcoming environments. To circumvent restrictions, Binance directed Chinese users to visit local websites with domain names before rerouting them to the global exchange. This tactic allowed Binance to keep a foothold in China, even after the government blocked direct access to its website in 2017.China’s central bank, responsible for imposing the crypto ban, remained silent when questioned about these developments. Binance’s official stance is that its website is blocked in China and inaccessible to users there.Holding on to its China-based users is crucial for Binance as it navigates a treacherous regulatory landscape that threatens its future. The company’s history with China is intricate. CZ established the firm in Shanghai in 2017, only for the government to initiate a series of regulatory attacks on crypto exchanges soon after. This led to concerns about money being illicitly moved out of the country, and Zhao eventually relocated Binance’s operations to Japan.Despite this move, Binance retained a significant workforce in China, a decision that raised concerns among its US arm regarding data control. Binance’s Chinese heritage also attracted attention, with Zhao addressing the company’s challenge of being labeled both a “criminal entity” in China and a “Chinese company” in the West.Binance’s relationship with China remains complex. As the exchange navigates these murky waters, its ability to operate under the radar and maintain its foothold in markets like China will undoubtedly play a significant role in determining its future trajectory.

Crypto.com, one of the world's largest cryptocurrency exchanges, has indefinitely delayed its service launch in South Korea after the country's financial regulators conducted an on-site inspection on the exchange. The inspection came after the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission detected data that appeared to violate anti-money laundering (AML) compliance requirements from the documents submitted by Crypto.com, according to local media Segye Ilbo. This decision came just six days ahead of its planned launch, originally scheduled for April 29.  The exchange has secured a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license by acquiring the local trading platform called OkBit in June 2022. A VASP license allows a digital asset exchange to operate in Korea.  Photo by Leeloo The First on PexelMitigating ‘Kimchi Premium’ effect Crypto.com initially planned to launch a mobile app featuring cryptocurrency trading on April 29, targeting South Korean retail investors. The platform aimed to differentiate itself from other local competitors by offering crypto assets at reasonable prices, mitigating the so-called Kimchi Premium effect, as announced in a press conference on April 2. The Kimchi premium refers to relatively high crypto prices in the Korean market compared to other foreign markets, which is prevalent in Korea’s major licensed crypto exchanges. The effect often results in Korean investors buying crypto assets at higher prices than those on other global crypto exchanges such as Binance. This is likely where the concerns for AML violation come up, financial experts assume, as the platform’s strategy could facilitate arbitrage during operation.  Crypto.com remains committed to Korea launch In a statement sent to CoinDesk, a spokesperson of Crypto.com said, “Crypto.com maintains the highest Anti-money Laundering standards in the industry. We will postpone our launch and take this opportunity to make sure Korean regulators understand our thorough policies, procedures, systems and controls, which have been reviewed and approved by major jurisdictions around the world.”  The person also mentioned that South Korea is a difficult market for global crypto exchanges to enter, but still emphasized the company’s commitment to cooperating with local regulators.  “OkBit maintained approximately 900 customers at the point of acquisition by Crypto.com, and OkBit has never been cited for any AML infractions. Since the acquisition, existing OkBit customer access has been limited to withdrawals,” the spokesperson said. 

Japan is preparing to shift oversight of crypto assets from its payments rulebook to its main securities law, a move that would treat digital tokens more squarely as investment products rather than payment tools, according to a new report from the country’s financial regulator. In a working-group paper on crypto asset regulation released Dec. 10, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) said it plans to bring “crypto assets” under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) instead of the Payment Services Act (PSA), as reported by local outlet CoinPost. The agency framed the change as an effort to strengthen investor protection as more households buy digital assets for investment purposes.Photo by Alessio Ferretti on UnsplashCrypto distinct from traditional securitiesThe regulatory perimeter itself would not expand. The FSA intends to keep using the PSA’s existing definition of “crypto assets,” while leaving non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and stablecoins outside the scope of the new framework. Under FIEA, crypto assets would be carved out as a distinct class separate from traditional securities, reflecting the fact that they generally do not confer legal claims such as dividends or interest payments. That distinction is already shaping how firms attempt to expand the economic utility of crypto assets. The move toward a clearer rulebook also arrives as market participants look for ways to construct return-generating mechanisms for assets that do not produce steady income on their own. Hong Kong–based Animoca Brands has partnered with Solv Protocol to provide Japanese institutions access to a Bitcoin-backed wrapper, according to Cointelegraph. The product is structured to generate returns in the 4% to 12% range for large holders, effectively layering yield on top of a token that otherwise provides no ongoing income. Rising retail demandThe regulator's report also details how deeply crypto has penetrated Japan’s retail market. As of October 2025, accounts at domestically registered crypto-asset exchanges had climbed past 13 million, with user deposits topping 5 trillion yen (about $32 billion). Roughly 70% of account holders fell into annual income brackets below 7 million yen (around $45,000), and more than 80% of individual accounts held less than 100,000 yen (about $640). The FSA said 86.6% of trading was driven by expectations of long-term price gains, indicating that most users view crypto primarily as an investment vehicle rather than a means of payment. Against that backdrop, the working group concluded that FIEA is a better fit than the PSA, which is geared toward payment services and anti-money-laundering (AML) controls. Shifting to the securities law would give regulators clearer authority to impose disclosure standards, govern conduct in the market, and levy penalties for unfair trading practices, the report said. The proposed framework would place heavier disclosure obligations on token issuances and initial exchange offerings (IEOs). Issuers or the listing exchanges would be required to provide key information to investors, and, in cases where an issuer does not have audited financial statements, offerings would be subject to investment limits. Crypto exchanges would face stronger due diligence requirements, tighter cybersecurity expectations, and broader insider-trading restrictions. Those rules would not only apply to employees at trading platforms but also to issuers and other insiders around listing events. Rules split for CEXs and DEXsCentralized exchanges (CEXs) would be supervised largely in line with securities firms. That would include requirements to maintain reserves or insurance to protect customer assets and expanded oversight of wallet-service providers connected to those platforms. Decentralized exchanges (DEXs), which have no central operator, would not be brought under the same regime. Instead, the FSA is proposing lighter, perimeter-based rules focused on disclosures by wallet providers and interface operators, coupled with efforts to warn users about the specific risks of trading on DEXs.  Industry participants, meanwhile, have raised concerns that licensed exchanges may face higher compliance costs in the near term as they adapt to the new regime.  Moving forward, the FSA is expected to refine the framework with an eye toward submitting a bill to the ordinary Diet session in the new year.