Chinese tech firm pours $15 million into Bitcoin fund

Financial regulators in Hong Kong are moving towards the presentation of stablecoin legislation following the completion of a consultation process. In February of this year, that consultation process, which received 108 submissions from professional bodies and industry stakeholders, was completed. It was run jointly by The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), culminating in the publication of the results of the process.Photo by Pat Whelen on UnsplashLegislative proposal publishedOff the back of that prior body of work, the regulators have now published a legislative proposal, incorporating responses to issues that were brought to light via the consultation process. The regulators concluded that going forward, stablecoin regulation should be considered primarily in terms of those stablecoin assets which operate on a ledger which runs on a decentralized basis. Additionally, no individual or unilateral entity should have the ability to tamper with or control those assets or the network upon which they exist. On this basis, the regulators intend to submit a bill relative to fiat-referenced stablecoins for consideration to the Legislative Council at a later stage in 2024. Before submitting any legislative proposal, the regulators plan to once again consult with stakeholders prior to finalizing any such proposal. As part of what they have set out thus far, regulators are looking to include a requirement for any stablecoin issuer to obtain a license in Hong Kong.  Reserve asset requirementsThey remain open to the idea that reserve assets backing an issued stablecoin could be held in an overseas jurisdiction. However, if the issuer is an overseas entity, it will be required to establish a local corporate entity in Hong Kong, with relevant management personal based within the Chinese autonomous territory. In light of feedback received during the consultation process, the regulator is looking at reducing the attestation frequency that each stablecoin issuer will be required to provide via an independent auditor in order to verify that the stablecoins issued are backed by the requisite amount of liquid assets.  Such reserve assets must be segregated from the working capital of the stablecoin issuer’s business, with the HKMA expressing a preference for a trust-like structure following input via the consultation process. Furthermore, reserve assets must be deemed to be both high quality and highly liquid, which would include cash, bank deposits and government issued securities where counterparty risk is minimized. On the basis that the Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the U.S. dollar, the regulator is content to allow issuers to use USD-denominated reserve assets if they prefer to do so. The legislative proposal also stipulates the need for issuers to have a minimum share capital of HK$25 million or 1% of the value of stablecoin in circulation.  The HKMA foresees crypto exchanges, securities firms and regulated banks having the ability to offer stablecoins to customers, so such offerings won’t be confined to dedicated stablecoin issuers.Back in March the HKMA introduced a stablecoin sandbox with a view towards learning what works best from a regulatory standpoint. It’s understood that a list of participants will be announced in the near future. Participating entities will be able to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong within that controlled sandbox environment, prior to full scale implementation once stablecoin regulation has been fully legislated for.

Surge in Hong Kong Crypto License Applications from Mainland-Linked BrokersTwo new platforms with mainland China links are preparing to apply for retail trading licenses in Hong Kong, with several others believed to be interested in following suit.According to a report published by Nikkei Asia earlier this week, the platforms, Yax and PantherTrade, have connections to mainland online securities brokers. PantherTrade is reportedly associated with Futu, a company which in turn is backed by Chinese tech giant Tencent, one of China’s largest technology companies. Yax, an emerging player in the crypto sector, has strong links to UP Fintech Holding, a Beijing-headquartered firm more commonly known as Tiger Brokers.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashCapital flight concernsThese connections are significant, given the previous involvement of these brokers in helping mainland Chinese customers invest in offshore assets, primarily US stocks. The firms have previously attracted the attention of China’s financial regulators. A notice from the Chinese securities watchdog in December last year compelled them to cease their “illegal cross-border business” activities.While crypto trading is banned in mainland China, an investigative report by the Wall Street Journal in August suggested that global exchange Binance was thriving in China despite the ban. Actions taken by the Chinese authorities are demonstrative of some level of concern with regard to crypto trading and potential capital flight through crypto.VASP licensingThe move by Yax and PantherTrade signals their intention to apply for a virtual asset service platform (VASP) license in Hong Kong, which would enable them to operate cryptocurrency exchanges for retail customers.Currently, both platforms are undergoing third-party assessments, a mandatory step preceding their formal application to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). The timeline for their applications remains uncertain.Broader interestThe growing interest in VASP licenses is not unique to Yax and PantherTrade. At least four other exchange platforms, similarly linked to mainland China, have also sought the same license, highlighting the eagerness of various players to enter the Hong Kong market. OneDegree, the sole licensed insurer for digital assets in Asia, has observed a significant uptick in license applications, including applications from traditional financial institutions, reflecting a positive trend toward educating the mass market.The SFC’s recent decision to make license application information public is an attempt to enhance transparency, following a scandal related to Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange JPEX in which over HK$1.5 billion (approximately $190 million) in virtual assets reportedly disappeared from the exchange.Currently, only two cryptocurrency exchanges, OSL and Hashkey, have received SFC approval. Others, including online brokers, have considered applying for licenses since late last year but are awaiting greater regulatory clarity before taking the plunge.Hong Kong, under the “one country, two systems” framework, has established itself as a hub for legal retail trading of cryptocurrencies. This development may signify a shift in China’s stance on digital assets and its increasing openness to crypto initiatives, as noted recently by blockchain data provider Chainalysis.

OKX is set to compensate users after its native exchange token, OKB, experienced a rapid 48% flash crash on Tuesday. OKB price fluctuationThe crash occurred within a brief three-minute window, triggered by a series of liquidations resulting from an abnormal price fluctuation. During the event, OKB's diluted market capitalization plummeted by $6.5 billion. At around 9 a.m. GMT on Tuesday, the price of OKB dropped from $46.80 to $25.10, representing a 48% decrease within 15 minutes. However, the token has since recovered, currently trading at $47.63 at the time of writing. The crash led to the triggering of liquidations for large leverage positions, causing a cascading effect on pledged loans, leverage transactions and cross-currency transactions.Photo by Nicholas Cappello on UnsplashCompensation planOKX responded promptly, pledging to fully compensate users for any additional losses incurred due to abnormal liquidation. The exchange aims to launch a specific compensation plan within the next three days, taking into account users who engaged in on-chain trades. In a statement on Tuesday, the platform suggested that it is committed to enhancing "margin position tier rules, risk management controls and liquidation mechanism" to prevent similar issues in the future. The flash crash coincided with a day of notable price swings across cryptocurrency markets, partly driven by the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust's (GBTC) sale of bitcoin to meet investor redemption demands on its exchange-traded fund (ETF). Additionally, the bankrupt crypto exchange FTX has been selling nearly $1 billion worth of GBTC ETF shares recently, further contributing to market volatility. Focusing on complianceOKX has been actively focusing on regulatory compliance in recent times. On Dec. 29, the exchange announced the delisting of several privacy coins, including Monero (XMR), Zcash (ZEC), Dash (DASH) and Horizen (ZEN). Subsequently, on Jan. 2, the platform introduced additional requirements for United Kingdom users to comply with the new Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, including the mandatory completion of risk assessment questionnaires before engaging in trading activities. Flash crashes are a common occurrence in cryptocurrency markets, often attributed to thin liquidity distributed across multiple venues. The 2% market depth for OKB indicates that a sell order exceeding $224,000 could potentially trigger another price cascade. Notwithstanding that, oftentimes it can be difficult to pinpoint the precise reason for a flash crash. In 2021 global crypto exchange Kraken experienced a flash crash that saw token prices drop by in excess of 50% over the course of one hour before recovery was achieved. While some suggested it was caused by a technical glitch, Kraken founder Jesse Powell dismissed that notion, pointing instead to the possibility of a large-scale sell-off by a service user. Despite this recent challenge, OKB remains a significant player in the cryptocurrency space, boasting a market cap of $2.8 billion, making it the fourth-largest exchange token in circulation, according to CoinGecko.