Top

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto funds

Web3 & Enterprise·November 07, 2023, 2:30 AM

Roger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.

Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

 

$8 million dispute

The crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.

The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.

However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.

 

Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocence

Roger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.

Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.

Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.

 

Matrixport standing firm

While Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.

The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.

Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:

“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 19, 2023

JPEX Exchange Scandal Sees Crypto Regulation Under Scrutiny in Hong Kong

JPEX Exchange Scandal Sees Crypto Regulation Under Scrutiny in Hong KongWhile Hong Kong has been developing steadily as a crypto sector hub, the focus in the Chinese autonomous territory has turned towards regulation after a recent scandal involving an unlicensed cryptocurrency exchange.Photo by Ihor Saveliev on UnsplashOngoing investigationYesterday we reported on some arrests relative to problems experienced at crypto exchange JPEX. The fallout continues on Tuesday, with the Hong Kong police now understood to have arrested eight individuals, including social media influencers who promoted the exchange and JPEX employees, on allegations of fraud. This illicit activity in and around the JPEX exchange has affected over 1,600 investors, implicating more than $150 million in assets.JPEX, in response to mounting pressure, announced the suspension of trading on its platform. In a statement, the exchange mentioned ongoing negotiations with third-party market makers to address liquidity shortages. However, JPEX also accused an unidentified third-party market maker of maliciously freezing funds, further complicating the situation.Politicians and regulators speak outResponding to the incident via a press conference on Tuesday, Hong Kong’s Chief Executive, John Lee, emphasized the significance of investing in virtual assets through licensed platforms. Lee stated:“This incident highlights the importance that when investors want to invest in virtual assets, then they must invest on platforms that are licensed.” He also pledged that the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) would closely monitor the situation to ensure investor protection.Elizabeth Wong, the Head of the SFC’s fintech unit, revealed that an investigation was underway to determine whether JPEX had violated anti-money laundering laws. The SFC had already declared JPEX unlicensed, prompting numerous complaints from investors who were unable to withdraw their virtual assets or experienced unexplained reductions in their balances.Assets frozenHong Kong authorities have taken decisive action against those involved in the scandal. They have frozen bank accounts valued at 15 million Hong Kong dollars ($1 million) and seized three properties valued at 44 million Hong Kong dollars. The police have reported receiving 1,641 complaints related to JPEX, involving a staggering $1.2 billion Hong Kong dollars. By last Wednesday, the SFC had received in excess of 1,000 complaints and at that point, they notified the general public.The JPEX scandal has drawn attention to the need for stronger cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong, a region that has become attractive to cryptocurrency firms since mainland China banned cryptocurrency transactions in 2021. In mainland China, trading cryptocurrencies on foreign exchanges from within the country remains illegal.Hong Kong’s response to cryptocurrency regulation has evolved. Beginning on June 1, the SFC started accepting applications from cryptocurrency exchanges, allowing licensed operators to serve retail investors, provided they understand the associated risks. Previously, only professional investors had access to such exchanges. Currently, only two exchanges in Hong Kong, OSL Exchange and Hashkey Exchange, have received approval to operate.As Hong Kong reevaluates its approach to cryptocurrency regulation, the crypto sector will hope that it strikes a balance between fostering innovation and protecting investors from fraud and market manipulation.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 07, 2023

Lawsuit Sees Further Chinese Crypto TV Coverage

Lawsuit Sees Further Chinese Crypto TV CoverageChina’s state broadcaster, CCTV, rarely covers the topic of crypto but in the space of the past three weeks, it has covered the subject twice, with the latest segment covering the news of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing a lawsuit against global crypto exchange, Binance.Photo by Paolo Chiabrando on UnsplashBad pressThe segment, which aired on CCTV, provided a brief overview of the lawsuit, stating that the SEC accused Binance, its Co-Founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ), and its American affiliate Binance.US of violating US securities laws. The report also noted that the prices of Bitcoin and Binance’s native BNB coin experienced a decline following the news.The lawsuit filed by the SEC received significant media attention due to Binance’s position as the world’s largest crypto exchange. The crypto industry in the US has been under increased scrutiny following the recent troubles faced by FTX, another major player in the market. Prosecutors have alleged that FTX engaged in fraudulent activities that harmed its users.Many blame US regulators who spent hundreds of hours with FTX executives working on projects, and US Capitol Hill politicians, 33% of whom received money from FTX, as being culpable for the FTX collapse. Despite this, it’s clear that the collapse is being leveraged to effect a clampdown on the digital assets sector.It is worth noting that the CCTV broadcast also made mention of a lawsuit filed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) against Binance and CZ in March. This lawsuit, similar to the SEC’s, focused on the sale of crypto derivatives. It is unclear whether CCTV covered the CFTC lawsuit when it was initially filed.CCTV’s coverage of crypto-related news is rare, making this particular broadcast significant and garnering wider attention. The outcome of legal action taken by the SEC against Binance is being watched carefully as it will likely have implications for digital asset regulation going forward.Previous coverageIn a previous broadcast last month, CCTV aired a segment that featured cryptocurrencies, including the Bitcoin logo. Ironically, given the nature of this latest reporting, Binance’s CZ regarded that previous coverage as a noteworthy event. Historically, such coverage has often preceded bull runs in the crypto market. The segment showcased what appeared to be a Bitcoin ATM in Hong Kong, displaying a prominent blue Bitcoin logo and an option to “Buy Bitcoins.”NFTs were also highlighted in the segment. Many speculated that the coverage signified a softening of the stance of the Chinese authorities in relation to crypto. However, the video of the initial crypto segment was taken down from the broadcaster’s website shortly after CZ tweeted about it.Despite it not being the most positive of news, CCTV’s coverage of the Binance lawsuit and its previous segment on cryptocurrencies indicates a growing interest in the industry from mainstream media outlets. The attention from a state broadcaster like CCTV suggests that regulators and authorities in China are closely monitoring developments in the crypto space and considering their potential impact on the broader financial landscape.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 26, 2025

Korea’s Upbit operator secures renewal amid influx of former regulatory officials

Dunamu, the operator of South Korea’s largest crypto exchange, Upbit, secured approval to renew its registration as a virtual asset service provider (VASP), ending 16 months of regulatory limbo that had clouded the domestic market.Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashAccording to Newsis, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission (FSC) granted the approval on Dec. 23. Industry participants view the decision as a stabilizing signal for the sector amid the country’s evolving crypto regulations. Under South Korean law, VASPs must renew their licenses every three years. Dunamu submitted its application by the statutory deadline of Aug. 21, 2024, but the review faced prolonged delays due to FIU staffing shortages and overlapping sanctions proceedings. Regulators had flagged Dunamu for alleged violations regarding customer due diligence and transaction restrictions, resulting in a 35.2 billion won ($24.4 million) fine. Prior to the fine, the FIU issued a disciplinary warning to Dunamu’s chief executive and ordered a three-month partial suspension of operations. Dunamu is currently contesting the suspension and warnings in court, with a fourth hearing scheduled for February 2026. Despite the ongoing litigation, the company stated it has addressed all regulatory issues and implemented measures to prevent recurrence. Market clarity fuels expansion, IPO ambitionsWith uncertainty surrounding the market leader resolved, observers expect other exchanges to feel emboldened to pursue expansion, including new business launches and potential initial public offerings (IPOs). Bithumb, the country’s second-largest exchange, is weighing a public listing as early as next year. Securing license renewal would bolster market confidence and expand the company’s strategic flexibility. Other major platforms, including Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax, filed renewal applications late last year. Each faces sanctions proceedings for alleged legal violations, leaving the market closely watching for FIU rulings. Exchanges recruit ex-regulatorsWith regulatory scrutiny remaining a constant challenge, South Korean exchanges are increasingly recruiting former senior financial regulators to navigate the legal landscape. Citing data from the FSC and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), Segye Ilbo reported that the flow of senior officials into the crypto sector has accelerated. Between January and November, eight former FSS officials at Grade 4 or above moved to crypto firms—well above the historical norm of one or two annually. Over the past two years, 16 former FSS officials have moved into the crypto industry, with nine joining Dunamu and seven moving to Bithumb. Industry insiders link the trend to the enforcement of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act in July 2024, which brought the sector under a formal regulatory framework. Exchanges are seeking the expertise of retired regulators to manage legal risk and strengthen government relations, particularly ahead of planned phase-two legislation focused on stablecoins. TradFi enters as systemic risks watchedAs digital assets move within official regulatory boundaries, traditional financial institutions are accelerating their entry into the sector. On Dec. 26, Korea Investment & Securities signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Bithumb to collaborate on asset management services, Yonhap News reported. The partnership aims to combine the brokerage's equities expertise with the exchange's digital asset capabilities to offer tailored products. However, the deepening ties between crypto and traditional finance have drawn the central bank's attention. In a Financial Stability Report released Dec. 23, the Bank of Korea (BOK) noted that the correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 has increased since 2020. The BOK attributed this to the introduction of crypto-related financial products, such as ETFs, and increased participation by institutional investors and publicly listed companies holding crypto. Spillover risks in South Korea remain contained given the limited level of corporate participation, despite the government’s move earlier this year to gradually permit corporate crypto holdings. However, the central bank warned that greater institutional participation enabled by regulatory easing could intensify risk transmission. The report underscored the need for safeguards to insulate Korean equities from crypto-market shocks. 

news
Loading