Top

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto funds

Web3 & Enterprise·November 07, 2023, 2:30 AM

Roger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.

Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

 

$8 million dispute

The crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.

The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.

However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.

 

Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocence

Roger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.

Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.

Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.

 

Matrixport standing firm

While Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.

The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.

Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:

“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 12, 2023

Coinbase Affirms Commitment to India Despite Disabling Sign-Ups

Coinbase Affirms Commitment to India Despite Disabling Sign-UpsLeading US-based cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase announced on Monday that it has temporarily disabled new user sign-ups for its exchange platform in India.A report emerged via India’s English-language business daily The Economic Times on Monday which stated that Coinbase was stopping “all services” for Indian users.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashClarification of a misunderstandingIt appears that Coinbase sent emails to a subset of its Indian customers, notifying them of the cessation of exchange operations in the country by September 25. However, a more recent report by TechCrunch outlined that Coinbase has provided further clarification that these emails were sent exclusively to customers who did not meet the updated standards set by the company.On that basis, these messages do not affect and are not relevant to the majority of Coinbase users in India. The email further advised affected users to transfer their funds from the platform by the specified date.A Coinbase spokesperson communicated to TechCrunch via email, stating:“We stopped allowing new user sign-ups on our exchange product in India back in June of this year. We maintain a robust tech hub in the country and offer live products, including our Coinbase Wallet. We are committed to India over the long term.”Coinbase’s proprietary exchange app in India reportedly boasts fewer than 50,000 monthly active users, as indicated by data from Sensor Tower, shared by an industry executive.Difficulty in cracking Indian marketDespite its aspirations, Coinbase has been unable to make headway with local authorities since launching its exchange in India over a year ago. The lack of progress with local officials has proven frustrating for company executives, including Durgesh Kaushik, who joined Coinbase last year as the Senior Director for Market Expansion, only to leave the company within a couple of months.Coinbase’s CEO, Brian Armstrong, made a visit to India last year to launch the exchange service by adding support for India’s popular payment instrument, the Unified Payments Interface (UPI). Unfortunately, the body overseeing UPI immediately denied Coinbase’s recognition, leading Coinbase to suspend support for the payment system shortly thereafter.UPI has proven to be a runaway success in India. Consequently, being able to access and integrate with it would be very important in providing Coinbase’s Indian customers with the means of on-ramping and off-ramping between the exchange and fiat currency. Coinbase affirmed its commitment to collaborating with the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) relative to UPI but these efforts simply have not borne fruit.RBI pushbackIn May of the same year, Armstrong disclosed that Coinbase had to halt its trading service in India due to “informal pressure” from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the nation’s central bank. Armstrong pointed out that cryptocurrency trading isn’t illegal in India — in fact, the country had recently imposed taxation on it. However, there were elements within the government, including the RBI, that appeared less enthusiastic about cryptocurrencies and were exerting “soft pressure” behind the scenes.Notably, other Indian cryptocurrency exchanges like CoinDCX and CoinSwitch remain operational, but they’ve had their own struggles in their own local market. In August CoinSwitch downsized its headcount, citing a 30% tax on crypto gains and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on transactions as contributing factors. That same month, CoinDCX cut its headcount by 12%.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Aug 07, 2023

NEOPIN Strengthens Japanese Market Strategy for Its Global Expansion

NEOPIN Strengthens Japanese Market Strategy for Its Global ExpansionNEOPIN, the global CeDeFi platform of South Korean investment holding company Neowiz Holdings, announced the strengthening of its strategy to enter the Japanese market as part of its global expansion plan.Photo by Aditya Anjagi on UnsplashThree key initiativesTo achieve this goal, NEOPIN has devised three key initiatives. Firstly, it will make investments in Japanese partners and provide support for their entry into other markets such as Korea, the Middle East, and Africa. Secondly, NEOPIN aims to facilitate the entry of its existing partners into Japan. Lastly, the Korean platform plans to collaborate closely with the Finschia Foundation and its members to effectively drive its expansion efforts in Japan.Web3 landscape in JapanSince the Mt. Gox incident in 2014, wherein the major Tokyo-based cryptocurrency exchange went bankrupt due to hacking attacks, Japan has responded by implementing stricter regulations. However, in recent times, the Japanese government has displayed a more positive stance towards Web3 technology, aiming to attain dominance in this sector. Illustrating this commitment, the Web3 project team, operating under the ruling Liberal Democratic Party’s (LDP) Working Group for Digital Society Promotion, released the Web3 White Paper in April. The document underscores Japan’s determination to lead the global market by fostering a business-friendly environment for Web3 innovation.Moreover, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida recently delivered a keynote speech at Japan’s annual Web3 conference, WebX, reaffirming the government’s dedication to establishing a Web3-friendly ecosystem. These initiatives signal Japan’s potential to contribute to the growth of the cryptocurrency and decentralized finance (DeFi) industry.Adaptation to regulationsNEOPIN’s operator Neowiz Partners, formerly known as NEOPLY, became part of the Innovation Programme of the Abu Dhabi Investment Office (ADIO) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with an aim to become the world’s first regulated DeFi platform. It is also working with the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) to develop a DeFi regulatory framework for the Gulf nation. In a similar vein, NEOPIN strives to respond quickly to the changing regulatory landscape in Japan to ensure the Korean CeDeFi protocol firmly establishes its presence in the Japanese market.In addition to providing direct and indirect service offerings in Japan, NEOPIN will also invest in and partner with local Web3 projects. One significant step taken by NEOPIN was its participation in IVS Crypto 2023, a high-profile Web3 startup event held in Kyoto in June. At this event, NEOPIN engaged with various Japanese businesses, initiating important connections. Since then, the Korean platform has been making progress in advancing communication and collaborations with Japanese enterprises.NEOPIN as blockchain validatorCollaboration with the Finschia Foundation will also be strengthened to achieve success in the Japanese market. In July, the blockchain mainnet Finschia launched its governance consortium and revealed its members. Within just four hours of the consortium’s launch, NEOPIN, as a governance member, received more than 1 million delegated votes, maintaining its position at the top spot in terms of voting power ever since. The Finschia mainnet was established by Line Tech Plus, a blockchain subsidiary of Tokyo-based messaging app giant Line Corporation.Serving as validators on various blockchains, including Ethereum, Tron, Cardano, and Cosmos, since 2017, NEOPIN has acquired blockchain and technical expertise. Last month, NEOPIN launched liquid staking products for ETH and KLAY, making it Korea’s first blockchain project to introduce an ETH liquid staking product. Liquid staking is a mechanism that allows users to deposit their cryptocurrencies into a staking pool, where they receive liquidity provider tokens in exchange. By holding these tokens, users can further redeposit them to earn additional yield.In light of this development, NEOPIN CEO Kim Yong-ki emphasized the CeDeFi protocol’s global expansion strategy, establishing its bases in the UAE, Japan, and Indonesia. These locations will serve as hubs for NEOPIN’s expansion efforts in the Middle East and Africa, Northeast Asia, and Southeast Asia. Kim added that NEOPIN will leverage its physical and human resources to achieve notable outcomes in the Japanese market.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 06, 2023

Korean Police Establishes Task Force to Tackle Virtual Asset-Related Crimes

Korean Police Establishes Task Force to Tackle Virtual Asset-Related CrimesIn response to the recent increase in virtual asset-related crimes in South Korea, the country’s police agency is establishing a dedicated task force to combat these illegal activities, according to local media outlet News1. This action by the National Police Agency comes as virtual asset legislation gained momentum and as prosecutors launched a joint virtual asset investigation division. Additionally, the police are considering establishing a new regional investigation unit focused on virtual asset-related investigations in the future.Photo by Sungho Song on PixabayMulti-divisional approachDuring this month, the police will consolidate various functions related to virtual asset investigations within its headquarters to establish the task force. This group will convene monthly meetings to exchange information on ongoing investigations and will also extend invitations to on-site investigators for the purpose of studying the most effective investigative methods and staying updated on the latest trends in virtual asset-related crimes.The task force will be jointly overseen by the heads of the Cyber Investigation Bureau and the Investigation Bureau and will consist of members from several divisions, including the Cyber Investigation Planning Division, Economic Crime Investigation Division, Cybercrime Investigation Division, Cyber Terrorism Response Division, Narcotic and Organized Crime Investigation Division, and National Security Investigation Command Division.Escalation of virtual asset crimesBy the end of the first half of this year, the global crypto market value reached $1.17 trillion, coinciding with a notable uptick in crypto-related criminal activities. In 2021, there were 427 instances of domestic fraud cases linked to cryptocurrencies, resulting in the arrest of 1,717 individuals. However, in 2022, these numbers increased to 628 cases involving 2,123 people. Furthermore, from January to July of the current year, the police have apprehended 1,146 individuals in connection with 327 cases related to cryptocurrency crimes.However, responding to virtual asset-related crimes presents a significant challenge due to their diverse nature and wide-ranging applications. For example, incidents involving crypto hacking typically fall under the jurisdiction of the Cybercrime Investigation Division. On the other hand, cases related to fraudulent crypto investment schemes are typically handled by the Economic Crime Investigation Division, while the Narcotic and Organized Crime Investigation Division concentrates on instances of drug trading conducted using cryptocurrencies.Paving the way for specialized expertiseFurthermore, as part of the task force’s efforts, the police will seek input and feedback regarding the potential establishment of a new department focused exclusively on investigating virtual assets in the future. A police official mentioned that the creation of such a dedicated unit is seen as a desirable step that could facilitate the development of specialized expertise among on-site officers. Looking ahead, the police are also contemplating the formation of a regional investigation unit specifically dedicated to cryptocurrency-related investigations, a unit akin to the existing Financial Crimes Investigation Unit.Upcoming law implementationThe police’s decision to form a working group is seen as a proactive step in preparation for the forthcoming Virtual Asset User Protection Act, slated to take effect in July next year. This legislation is designed to enable legal action against unfair trading practices related to virtual assets, including the misuse of undisclosed information, market manipulation, and illicit transactions. It parallels the regulatory framework applied to financial investment products.In August, public prosecutors took action by launching a joint cryptocurrency investigation division at the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office in collaboration with several key agencies, including the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), National Tax Service (NTS), Korea Customs Service (KCS), Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC), and Korea Exchange (KRX). Moreover, in light of the growing importance of legal issues related to cryptocurrencies, prominent law firms have been swiftly mobilizing to establish specialized teams dedicated to handling crypto legal cases.This trend is not limited to South Korea alone; it is also unfolding in other countries. For instance, in a parallel development, the Hong Kong Police Force and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have recently instituted a working group to monitor and address suspicious activities linked to virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs).

news
Loading