Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto funds

DigiFT Unveils First Fully Regulatory-Compliant US Treasury TokenDigiFT, a pioneering decentralized exchange (DEX) for digital assets with a Singapore-based project team, has made waves in the financial landscape with the official launch of the DigiFT US Treasury Token.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsTradFi and blockchain convergenceThe company announced the launch of the Treasury token, known as “DUST,” via a press release on Thursday. It’s the first-ever fully regulatory-compliant US Treasury token issued on a public blockchain, signaling a powerful convergence of traditional finance and blockchain technology.DUST has the potential to be a game-changer in the crypto space, offering accredited and institutional investors an unparalleled opportunity to seamlessly invest in US Treasuries through a secure and transparent on-chain channel. One of its standout features is its backing by a single US Treasury note with a specific maturity date, instilling confidence and reassurance in investors seeking stable and reliable assets.Regulatory complianceThere are other tokenized treasuries in existence already. However, DigiFT differentiates its product through adherence to rigorous regulatory standards, ensuring that the tokenization process aligns with established financial norms.Henry Zhang, CEO of DigiFT, expressed his enthusiasm about this groundbreaking achievement:“The launch of DigiFT US Treasury Token represents our commitment to bring the best of both decentralized finance (DeFi) and traditional yield to investors.”He emphasized that DUST not only bridges the gap between DeFi and real-world assets (RWAs) but also upholds the highest standards of regulatory compliance.DUST’s innovative structure offers investors the flexibility to participate using US dollars or US dollar stablecoin (USD Coin). The product is accessible to all, given that it facilitates a minimum investment amount of 1 USD or USDC. To enhance accessibility further still, DUST ensures same-day settlement for investments below USD 50,000, contingent on liquidity conditions.Zhang emphasized the transformative potential of DUST, stating: “We believe that tokenization of RWAs is poised to become the future of investing, and DUST will support the wider adoption of digital tokens with its compliant features.”Rapid progressThe issuance of DUST tokens is overseen by Red Cedar Digital Pte. Ltd., an affiliate of DigiFT, with a yield to maturity (YTM) of 5.40% as of August 3, 2023. DigiFT’s journey began in 2020 when it became the first and only DEX to be accepted into the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) FinTech Regulatory Sandbox.Since then, DigiFT’s list of achievements has grown exponentially. The platform successfully listed a tokenized corporate note from Diners Club (Singapore), which achieved full subscription at its initial offering.Additionally, a tokenized bond, backed by a Barclays 8% Perpetual Bond and custodied with a licensed global financial institution, reinforced DigiFT’s reputation for innovation. The platform’s regulatory-compliant access to Matrixdock’s Short-term Treasury Bill Token (STBT) further solidified its role in pioneering secure and transparent investment avenues.DigiFT’s product offering demonstrates that we are likely to see an ongoing blurring of the lines between blockchain-based innovation and traditional products in conventional finance over the next few years. As DigiFT continues to champion regulatory compliance and innovation, investors can anticipate even more transformative solutions that harmonize the best of both worlds.

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”

As South Korea’s cryptocurrency market rapidly evolves, authorities are working to keep the nation's regulatory framework up to speed. Recent initiatives aim to provide clearer guidelines across the sector, encompassing tax policy adjustments, seized assets, and bank-backed digital tokens.Photo by André François McKenzie on UnsplashGovt tightens control over seized cryptoAccording to Yonhap News, the government has approved a new framework for managing roughly 78 billion won ($54 million) in crypto held by the public sector. The move is aimed at imposing clearer controls over digital assets that state agencies hold, including tokens seized or frozen during investigations. Under the new rules, crypto taken from personal wallets must be transferred immediately into agency-controlled cold wallets kept offline. Sensitive access data, including private keys and recovery phrases, must be split among at least two people rather than left in the hands of a single official. That push for tighter custody comes as South Korea also explores new forms of digital money. A bank-issued product known as a deposit token is emerging as a possible middle ground between private stablecoins and a central bank digital currency, or CBDC. Deposit tokens are digital assets backed by bank deposits. They can function like stablecoins in payments, but they are issued by banks rather than crypto firms. The idea is gaining attention as legal uncertainty around stablecoins drags on. South Korea’s central bank has already moved its CBDC pilot, Project Hangang, into a second phase. The Digital Times reported that two more lenders, Kyongnam Bank and iM Bank, have joined the seven banks that participated in the first round: KB Kookmin, Shinhan, Hana, Woori, NH NongHyup, IBK, and Busan Bank. In practice, the emerging view is that deposit tokens may not compete directly with a future CBDC so much as complement it, especially in everyday payments and settlement where banks already have distribution, compliance, and customer infrastructure. Tax gaps persist as market expandsEven as the payments debate advances, tax policy remains underdeveloped. South Korea is set to begin taxing crypto assets in January 2027, but the National Tax Service still does not have detailed standards for several common types of crypto income, according to the Herald Business. Those include staking, lending, airdrops, hard forks, NFTs, and decentralized finance. In a written reply to a lawmaker’s office, the agency said it is still collecting overseas legislative examples and expert views on what should count as taxable crypto income and how acquisition costs should be calculated. That gap is especially important for offshore activity. Profits earned through overseas exchanges are difficult to track outside the 56 jurisdictions participating in the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), an OECD-developed international regime for sharing tax information on crypto assets. The result is growing concern over uneven tax treatment and the possibility that capital could shift abroad if enforcement remains patchy. At the same time, global stablecoin issuers are trying to deepen ties with Korean institutions. Tether, the company behind stablecoin USDT, has returned to South Korea again this year after visiting in 2025. The Aju Business Daily reported that it has been in talks with players including KB Financial Group and local exchange Coinone, looking for ways to expand trading activity and circulation. Tether has argued that its network could help broaden Korea’s crypto ecosystem, while also promoting its new dollar-pegged stablecoin, USAT, as compliant and secure. The sector’s operational risks are also still visible at the exchange level. Bithumb has begun legal proceedings to freeze assets as it tries to recover seven Bitcoin that it failed to claw back after an erroneous payout during a promotional event in February. At the time, the unrecovered amount was worth about 700 million won ($483,000). The move points to a likely civil suit. According to an industry source cited by Chosun Biz, some customers refused to return the funds, arguing that the mistake was the company’s fault. Legal opinion in South Korea, however, appears to be broadly in Bithumb’s favor if the dispute ends up in court.