Japanese cabinet approves crypto tax reform

Reports from South Korea indicate that the nation is considering transforming its temporary crypto investigative unit into a permanent fixture to tackle the escalating cases of crimes and fraud related to cryptocurrencies. Government deliberations to elevate investigative unitAccording to local publication Segye Ilbo, the South Korean Justice Ministry and the Ministry of the Interior and Safety are gearing up to commence discussions in early May regarding the elevation of the Joint Virtual Asset Crime Investigation Unit to an official department.Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashAims of the promotionThe proposed elevation seeks to formalize the status of the unit, which currently operates as a temporary body under the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office and faces the possibility of disbandment. The transition aims to enhance operational efficiency by facilitating the appointment of new prosecutors and allocating dedicated budgetary resources, as outlined by Segye. Background of the investigative unitEstablished in July 2023, the unit comprises approximately 30 experts drawn from seven financial and tax regulatory authorities. It represents South Korea's inaugural investigative body specializing in digital asset crimes, a response to the surge in crypto-related criminal activities witnessed in the country. Rising incidents of crypto-related crimesThe urgency to establish a permanent investigative unit stems from the notable increase in crypto-related criminal incidents. According to a February report from South Korea’s Financial Intelligence Unit, local crypto firms reported a total of 16,076 suspicious transactions in 2023, reflecting a significant 49% surge compared to the previous year. Upcoming crypto regulationsIn tandem with efforts to strengthen investigative capabilities, South Korea is preparing to implement its first comprehensive crypto regulation on July 19. The new regulatory framework aims to safeguard investors by imposing stricter penalties for market manipulation, including the possibility of life sentences in certain cases. 

Ripple Exec: Clear Regs Helped Japanese Market Withstand Crypto WinterEmi Yoshikawa, the Vice President of Strategy & Operations at business-focused crypto solutions provider Ripple, has attributed the Japanese cryptocurrency market’s ability to withstand the recent crypto winter to well-defined regulations.©Pexels/WorldspectrumSecurity breach at Mt.GoxIn a recent interview with Korean blockchain media outlet Digital Asset, Yoshikawa noted that Japan implemented regulations on cryptocurrencies earlier than other countries, in part due to the 2014 security breach at the Tokyo-based Bitcoin exchange Mt.Gox that resulted in investor losses.The Mt.Gox exploit prompted revisions to the Payment Services Act, which now recognizes cryptocurrencies as a means of payment. Furthermore, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act was revised in 2020 to give security tokens the same status as stocks. The Japanese government is also exploring the possibility of allowing the domestic circulation of foreign stablecoins.Although it took several years for companies to enter the market after the regulatory framework was established, the security token market has since expanded, with more businesses now participating.Yoshikawa credited the Japanese crypto market’s resilience during the recent global crypto winter to clear regulatory guidelines. The recognition of cryptocurrencies as financial instruments enabled the regulation of not only spot trading but also derivatives trading. Japanese exchanges are also required to hold customer funds separately in trust firms, ensuring investor protection. This regulatory environment allowed companies and investors to confidently enter the crypto industry last year.FTX JapanFTX Japan’s return of customer assets and resumption of withdrawals in February showcased the effectiveness of these clear regulatory guidelines. Among subsidiaries of the now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, FTX Japan is the only one to have returned customer assets thus far, Yoshikawa emphasized.While crypto regulations in some areas, such as taxation, remain insufficient, both the Japanese government and entrepreneurs agree that the Web3 industry should develop in a way that benefits the nation’s economy.Ripple’s projects in JapanYoshikawa said that Ripple views the Japanese market as one of its key markets. In 2016, the company formed a joint venture, SBI Ripple Asia, with Japanese financial group SBI Holdings. Through this partnership, Ripple collaborated with several Japanese financial institutions to launch RippleNet and provide liquidity to the payment service.Japan’s largest remittance technology firm, SBI Remit, has adopted RippleNet and Ripple’s own remittance system On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) to facilitate real-time payments between Japan and Southeast Asian nations. Yoshikawa underlined that Ripple is committed to supporting Southeast Asian workers in Japan who need swift and cost-effective international payments.

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), an independent state agency responsible for the supervision of capital markets including the digital assets sector within the Southeast Asian nation, has moved to block five cryptocurrency exchange platforms. In a statement published by the agency to its website on Thursday, May 29, the SEC outlined that it deems the five exchanges, namely OKX, Bybit, CoinEx, XT.com and 1000X.Live, to be unauthorized crypto trading platforms.Photo by REY MELVIN CARAAN on UnsplashCountering money laundering activityIt is acting against these platforms “to protect investors” and to prevent their use for money laundering purposes. In offering services to Thai users on an unauthorized basis, the exchanges were found to be in breach of Thailand’s Digital Asset Business Act B.E. 2561 (2018). The agency has asked the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) to take measures to block local access to these online platforms. That block will be put in place on June 28. On that basis, the SEC has advised Thai users of such platforms to proceed to remove their assets from them before that June 28 deadline.  An updated version of the Royal Decree on Measures to Prevent and Suppress Technology-related Crime, (No. 2) B.E. 2568 (2025), was introduced by the Thai government in April. It facilitated the establishment of the Committee for the Prevention and Suppression of Technological Crime.  Following practices overseasThe committee met with the MDES in April, with the parties setting out the process through which unauthorized digital asset platforms would be restricted and blocked. On that occasion, similar practices carried out in other jurisdictions within the Asian region were referred to.  In December 2023 India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) moved to block nine offshore crypto exchanges, having issued them with compliance show-cause notices.  In April 2024 the Philippines SEC requested that Google and Apple remove apps associated with global exchange Binance from the local versions of their application stores. Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) similarly ordered both companies to remove apps belonging to unregistered crypto exchanges in February of this year. Back in March, the Thai SEC filed a lawsuit against Aux Cayes FinTech Co. Ltd., an OKX affiliate company. The complaint alleged that OKX had been running an unlicensed exchange in Thailand, and was filed with the Economic Crime Suppression Division of the Thai police force. The SEC outlined on March 21 that a similar criminal complaint had been filed against XT.com. It’s understood that Bybit, CoinEx and 1000X.Live have also been recipients of complaints on the same basis. Earlier this year, the Economic Crime Suppression Division considered taking action against Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, on the basis that the platform violated Thailand’s gambling laws, and in doing so, posing a risk to economic and social stability in Thailand. In April 2024, the SEC issued a warning to crypto exchange platforms against the use of misleading advertising, drawing their attention to the fact that advertising of that nature would potentially place those platforms in breach of regulatory guidelines.