Ripple to lead National Bank of Georgia’s CBDC pilot project

Korean Prosecutors Allocate $734K Budget for Crypto Crime InvestigationsThe South Korean Supreme Prosecutors’ Office has earmarked a budget of up to KRW 986 million (approximately $734,000) this year for investigations pertaining to virtual assets, according to data received by the local newspaper Law Times from the Ministry of Justice last Thursday. The significant size of the budget suggests that the prosecution is prioritizing efforts to combat the growing surge in virtual asset-related crimes.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashBudget divisionWithin this budget, KRW 778 million has been designated for the purchase of software licenses for virtual asset tracing and analysis equipment, while KRW 280 million has been allocated for an integrated strategic plan to establish a platform for analyzing and tracing unauthorized virtual asset transactions. The budget for this platform consists of preliminary planning costs. Related expenditures are expected to increase as the project is fully implemented.“It is true that our budgets are being concentrated on crimes related to virtual assets due to the fact that they have recently become a social issue,” said a prosecution official. “It may not be a lot compared to our overall budget, but assigning almost KRW 1 billion for one specific field of investigation is still a considerate amount.”Rising crypto crimesIn Korea, crimes associated with virtual assets have been increasing annually. This includes tax evasion, bribery, foreign exchange law violations, and money laundering, as well as cryptocurrency market issues including issuance, listing, and distribution. According to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, reported cases of suspicious virtual asset transactions received by the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU) surged from an average of 66 cases per month in 2021 to 900 cases in 2022, then 943 cases in 2023 — a fourteen-fold increase in just three years.Subsequently, the scale of the damages caused by cryptocurrency crimes has also seen a sharp rise. The total value of all reported damages skyrocketed from KRW 467.4 billion in 2017 to KRW 1.02 trillion last year, more than doubling in five years. The cumulative loss over this period exceeds KRW 5.3 trillion.Focused effortsThe prosecution has thus dispatched financial experts from organizations including KoFIU and Korea Exchange to create a joint virtual asset crime investigation unit under the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office dedicated to investigating cryptocurrency crimes.The prosecution’s Cybercrime Investigation Division has also begun developing a tracking system optimized for the Korean market to trace the flow of virtual assets. The foreign software that is currently being used for tracking comes with considerable expenses and limitations, particularly for tracking flows within the domestic market, where there are many transactions involving smaller, locally-issued cryptocurrencies called “kimchi coins.”“We are dedicating our manpower and technological development to virtual asset investigations,” said a high-ranking official from the prosecution. “We will also strive to secure the budget necessary for these efforts.”

China’s former central bank governor has warned that speculation in stablecoins could threaten financial stability, Bloomberg reported, citing a post from the Beijing-based think tank CF40 Research. His remarks run counter to calls from some economists and industry figures for a yuan-backed stablecoin as the U.S. advances its digital-asset policy agenda. Zhou Xiaochuan, who led the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) from 2002 to 2018, delivered the comments at a closed-door meeting in mid-July. He argued that China’s payment rails—spanning third-party platforms, the central bank digital currency (CBDC), digital wallets, and clearing infrastructure—are already highly efficient, leaving little scope for stablecoins to deliver meaningful cost savings. He also rejected the premise that conventional cross-border payments come at steep costs. Zhou identified price manipulation driven by speculative trading as the chief risk to financial and asset markets, adding that current safeguards in the U.S., Hong Kong, and Singapore remain inadequate.Photo by Mitchell Luo on UnsplashOnshore controls push yuan stablecoins offshoreAny debate over a yuan-linked token must also contend with China’s currency structure. The onshore yuan (CNY) is subject to strict capital controls and limited cross-border convertibility, while the offshore yuan (CNH) trades more freely. As a result, any prospective yuan stablecoin would likely reference the CNH; pegging directly to the CNY would conflict with Beijing’s capital rules. An earlier Reuters report has indicated that Beijing is weighing whether to authorize a yuan-pegged stablecoin to promote international use of the currency. Analysts caution that such a token would almost certainly be confined to offshore markets, even if regulators proceed. U.S. sets federal guardrails for stablecoinsMeanwhile, policy moves in the U.S. are gathering pace. In July, President Donald Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act into law, creating a federal framework for stablecoins. A White House fact sheet says the law requires issuers to maintain 100% reserves in liquid assets such as U.S. dollars or short-term Treasuries and to publish monthly disclosures on reserve composition. The administration has argued that dollar-backed stablecoins could bolster demand for Treasuries and reinforce the dollar’s reserve-currency role. Hong Kong has emerged as comparatively receptive to digital assets. The special administrative region’s Stablecoins Ordinance entered into force on Aug. 1, establishing a licensing regime to oversee Hong Kong dollar–backed stablecoins. Earlier this month, CMB International Securities, a subsidiary of China Merchants Bank, became the first Chinese bank-affiliated institution to offer trading in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether (USDT). Industry voices are also pressing the case for stablecoins. At the WebX conference in Tokyo on Aug. 25, Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) argued that CBDCs are becoming obsolete, while stablecoins—typically backed by real assets—enable wider transactions and are gaining market traction. He said CBDCs remain rarely implemented due to limited demand and suggested China appears more open to stablecoins after years of tighter oversight, pointing to Hong Kong’s efforts to build an ecosystem. Potential PBOC stimulus may lift cryptoChina remains a consequential force in global crypto markets. A recent report suggested that potential PBOC stimulus could fuel an altcoin rally. With China accounting for 19.5% of global GDP, shifts in its monetary stance are seen as important drivers of worldwide liquidity. Following July data showing a 0.1% month-on-month decline in retail sales, a 0.4% rise in industrial production, and an uptick in unemployment to 5.2%, analysts expect measures to support growth. Any additional liquidity could flow into risk assets, including cryptocurrencies, potentially pushing digital tokens toward new highs. 

South Korean lawmakers are moving to seize control of the nation’s stalled second phase of digital asset legislation, aiming to bypass months of interagency gridlock and introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework by January. The legislative acceleration comes as Seoul races to align with global standards following the implementation of the U.S. GENIUS Act in July, a shift that has intensified pressure on local regulators to formalize oversight of the crypto sector. According to a report from the Maeil Business Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act as a lawmaker-sponsored bill rather than wait for a government submission. The procedural move is intended to ensure that formal deliberations can begin during the February provisional session. Lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon, a DPK member of the National Policy Committee, told reporters on Dec. 11 that relying on the government’s timeline would jeopardize passage of the bill in the first half of next year. Kang cited points of disagreement among the parliament, the government, and industry stakeholders. Among the authorities, in particular, a standoff between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over monetary policy and issuance authority has been a key source of delay.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashDraft sets ‘major’ stablecoin requirementsAt the heart of the legislation is a new classification system for stablecoins. The government delivered its draft for the Digital Asset Basic Act to DPK’s Digital Asset Task Force, outlining its intention to classify won-denominated stablecoins exceeding a certain issuance threshold as “major digital payment tokens.” According to Blockmedia, citing sources familiar with the closed-door briefing to the task force, these assets would fall under a rigorous oversight framework developed in consultation with the central bank. Under the draft rules, issuers would be required to maintain 100% reserves, prohibited from making interest payments to holders, and obliged to submit detailed issuance plans to the FSC. Foreign-issued stablecoins would only be permitted to circulate domestically if the issuer establishes a local branch. Although the government ultimately submitted its draft to the DPK, the delivery was delayed by two days, missing the Dec. 10 deadline set by the party. Officials attributed the postponement to unresolved interagency disagreements. The central bank had argued that any issuance should require unanimous approval from all relevant agencies, including itself, but the government agreed to involve the bank only when a token is designated as “major.” The Bank of Korea continues to advocate for a bank-led consortium issuance model, highlighting the coordination challenges that have complicated the bill’s preparation. Supply thresholds emerge as fault lineCritics warn that the proposed regulations could inadvertently tilt the market against domestic innovation. Analysts argue that if the threshold for the "major" designation is set too low, new won-based issuers may face compliance costs that could undermine their business viability before they reach meaningful scale. They added that setting the bar for entrenched dollar-backed issuers such as USDT and USDC is also complex, given that their combined global issuance already exceeds $250 billion. Market participants said concerns about triggering the “major” designation could prompt Korean issuers to cap supply to avoid heightened scrutiny, effectively stifling growth from the outset. Despite these concerns, political will to close the policy vacuum is hardening. The DPK intends to move the legislation forward on its own timetable, incorporating the government’s input but steering the process through parliament. Lawmaker Kang emphasized that while numerous issues remain, the task force aims to narrow the debate to a few essential questions before the bill’s planned introduction in January. Industry representatives have largely welcomed the clearer timeline, viewing the move as a necessary step to reduce uncertainty as the global crypto sector comes under more formal regulatory oversight.