Hivemind Capital Partners expands into Hong Kong market

The South Korean government and the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plan to finalize legislation governing Korean won–pegged stablecoins by March. According to local media outlet DataNews, the two sides will hold a closed-door meeting on Jan. 20 to discuss agenda items related to the proposed Digital Asset Basic Act, widely referred to as the second phase of South Korea’s cryptocurrency legislation. A key sticking point is who should be allowed to issue stablecoins. Financial regulators favor, at least initially, limiting issuance to consortia in which banks hold a majority stake (50% plus one share), citing concerns about financial-market stability. The Democratic Party, however, opposes granting banks majority control. Separately, the draft would require issuers to meet capital-adequacy standards and maintain reserves equal to at least 100% of outstanding stablecoins.Photo by Greg Willson on UnsplashCBDC pilots to streamline public fundsBeyond private stablecoins, the government is also exploring potential public-sector uses for central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), including pilot programs that would deploy CBDC-based deposit tokens. As part of a broader digital transformation push, officials aim to use CBDC rails for a significant portion of public funds administration. By June, CBDC-based deposit tokens are set to be used in an electric vehicle charging infrastructure project: buyers of approved chargers would receive tokens to help ensure subsidies go only to eligible purchases and to shorten settlement times. Regulators are also considering steps to expand institutional access to cryptocurrencies. Under one proposal, publicly listed companies would be allowed to invest up to 5% of their equity in digital assets annually. Eligible investments would be limited to the top 20 tokens traded on the country’s five largest exchanges, with the list reviewed every six months. It remains undecided whether stablecoins, including USDT, would be included. Another planned change would permit the trading of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track spot crypto prices. While current law does not recognize digital assets as eligible underlying assets for such products, that is expected to change under the forthcoming legislative revision. Exchanges say caps threaten growthAt the same time, proposed governance changes that could cap controlling stakes at around 15% to 20% have drawn pushback from industry groups. The draft Digital Asset Basic Act would reshape control structures at South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit—which together serve roughly 11 million users. Regulators at the Financial Services Commission (FSC) say the measures are intended to curb concentrated influence by founders and major shareholders, and are considering a framework modeled on rules for alternative trading systems (ATS) under the Capital Markets Act. Yonhap News reported that the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA)—which includes the four exchanges above as well as Gopax—has warned the proposed governance restrictions could slow the growth of South Korea’s crypto industry. The group argued the changes would dilute the accountability of a clear controlling shareholder, particularly regarding custody and management of customers’ digital assets. DAXA urged regulators to adopt a framework aligned with global standards, warning that stricter caps could increase uncertainty for startups and discourage entrepreneurship and investment. Investors pour $2.4B into overseas crypto ETFsThe lack of domestically available spot crypto ETFs has also driven Korean investors to seek exposure overseas. According to the Korea Securities Depository, as cited by Edaily, Korean investors bought a net $2.37 billion of foreign crypto ETFs between Jan. 13, 2025, and Jan. 12, 2026, placing these products among the top 50 overseas securities by net purchases over the period. Those purchases included a mix of spot-linked products, crypto futures–based instruments, and funds tracking companies that hold digital assets on their balance sheets. Several of the most heavily purchased products involved leverage or options-based strategies, including the T-REX 2x Long BMNR Daily Target ETF ($573.1 million) and the YieldMax MSTR Option Income ETF ($493.9 million). Leverage-heavy demand has been a recurring feature of Korean retail trading. In an October report, Bloomberg noted that prospective homebuyers have increasingly turned to crypto in hopes of building capital, fueling appetite for higher-risk altcoins. Such tokens account for more than 80% of trading volume on local exchanges. 

Seoul and Baobab Partners Face Controversy Over Unpaid Prize Winnings for SWF2023 HackathonThe city of Seoul has come under public scrutiny for failing to pay the winners of the Seoul Web3 Festival (SWF2023) Hackathon a cash prize worth KRW 150 million (approximately $112,000). The Seoul Metropolitan Government has argued that since it was simply a naming rights sponsor, the responsibility for paying the prizes lies with Baobab Partners, who co-hosted the event. However, critics argue that the city did not properly vet Baobab Partners more rigorously before hosting the event.Photo by okaybuild on PixabayUnpaid prizes lingerThe SWF2023 Hackathon took place from July 31 to August 2 at Dongdaemun Design Plaza (DDP) and was co-hosted by the city of Seoul, the Seoul Design Foundation, and Baobab Partners. It offered a total prize pool of KRW 150 million attracting 417 participants who made up 115 teams.However, although over two months have passed since then, the winners are yet to be paid their prize money. “Baobab Partners initially proposed the SWF2023 event, and they were responsible for gathering the necessary sponsorship funds to run the event,” said a city representative.According to industry sources on Monday, the company’s CEO, Choi Jin-beom, issued a handwritten apology last Friday regarding the incident. “We promised to pay the winners by today, but we were unable to deliver on that promise. We explored multiple avenues, including investors, new contractors, and other assets, but were ultimately unable to secure the funds to do so,” he said. “The narrative that the funds were diverted elsewhere or invested in cryptocurrencies or stocks is untrue,” he added, clarifying that related information was transparently disclosed to the city of Seoul.Baobab Partners’ swift rise raises industry eyebrowsBaobab Partners had previously participated as an event planner at last year’s Blockchain Week in Busan, which turned out to be a success. “We also spoke with the Busan city government, who gave a positive opinion of the company,” the representative added. It was under this context that Seoul entered into a naming rights agreement with Baobab Partners. The agreement stipulated that the company would be in charge of attracting and managing sponsorships, and the prize money and operational costs would be covered by corporate sponsorship funds.Nevertheless, questions have arisen within the industry about Baobab Partners’ short track record and its successive collaborations with public organizations. Baobab Partners is a startup that was founded in May 2021. In November of the same year, the firm signed memoranda of understanding with three blockchain companies during NFT Busan 2021, a large-scale NFT fair held in the southern port city to share the latest blockchain trends. As a result of its efforts, it was listed alongside prominent companies such as Coinone and Onther despite only six months passing since its establishment. Subsequently, Baobab Partners relocated from Seoul to Busan, and the following year, it participated as an event planner at Blockchain Week in Busan.Accumulating allegationsSpeculation suggests that this success was not solely due to Baobab Partners’s capabilities. The company’s CEO is believed to have political connections, according to an anonymous industry insider. Choi denied such claims and stressed that its technical expertise should not be downplayed, citing the fact that Baobab Partners was the first entity in Korea to develop virtual reality (VR) banking technology and had received a KRW 15 billion investment from Finger, a KOSDAQ-listed company.Baobab Partners has also been mired in controversy over supposedly unpaid wages. In response to a claim made by an industry source that many former employees of Baobab Partners have still not received their due wages, a Seoul representative stated that there is no such dispute according to conversations with company representatives, seeking to dispel the dispute. Choi further explained, “We didn’t have wage disputes until last year. The difficulty in paying wages began in January this year due to the failure to execute promised investment funds.”The city said that it is currently conducting legal examinations and looking into necessary measures for two matters involving Baobab Partners, including the handling of hackathon winnings.

Late Korean artist Lee Jung-seob’s ‘Bull’ NFT on auction at OpenSeaNFT marketplace OpenSea is hosting an ongoing auction for a digital representation of the painting “Bull” by the late Korean artist Lee Jung-seob, Yonhap News TV reported on Tuesday. Celebrated for his distinctive lines in his paintings, Lee passed away in 1956. This auction is set to conclude on Dec. 12, with the starting bid placed at 300 WETH (Wrapped Ethereum), which is approximately equivalent to $626,000.Photo by Hans Eiskonen on UnsplashWhite bull as NFTLee’s “Bull,” featured in the OpenSea auction, is distinguished by its depiction of a white bull set against a dark green background. This particular piece is one of Lee’s unpublished works and is currently being offered for sale by a private art collector. Regarding the authenticity of the painting, the description on the OpenSea page states, “This work received a handwritten evaluation from Professor Jung Jum-sik, a founding member of the Lee Jung-seob Art Award, on November 9, 2000.”The current owner of the original artwork has expressed their intention for auctioning it as a desire to share a valuable piece of art. The painting originally belonged to poet Ku Sang and has since changed hands multiple times, experiencing some damage along the way. While the copyright for an artist’s work typically remains with their inheritors for 70 years posthumously, in the case of Lee Jung-seob, this period has already lapsed.Authenticity and NFT investmentsMeanwhile, art appraisal experts are advising caution, emphasizing the need to first confirm the authenticity of the original painting. This caution stems from the fact that the painting has not undergone evaluation by an official appraisal organization.During his interview with Yonhap, Jung Jun-mo, CEO of Korea Art Authentication Appraisal Inc., offered a word of caution regarding investment in NFTs tied to artworks with questionable authenticity. He emphasized that NFTs representing works that lack genuine authentication also hold no value in terms of authenticity. Jung advised potential investors to thoroughly verify the legitimacy of such artworks before proceeding with any investment in their NFT representations.Last year, many paintings of modern Korean artists were converted into NFTs, but they sparked controversy over issues of authenticity. Experts in art investment have since been advising thorough research prior to making any investments in these digital assets. They warn that losses incurred from transactions involving these NFTs fall squarely on the investors.