Xangle and CryptoTimes partner to advance Web3 adoption in Korea and Japan

Binance Japan Sets Out Market VisionDuring a virtual business discussion recently led by Takeshi Chino, the Head of Binance Japan, the firm provided insights into its vision within the Japanese market.Photo by David Edelstein on UnsplashIntegrating international version featuresSince its recent launch, Binance Japan has primarily been offering cryptocurrency spot trading and its “Simple Earn” crypto lending service. Expansion into leverage trading is on the horizon, aligning with the international version once regulatory requirements are met.Other key services that Binance has been offering on an international basis include its Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) platform “Launchpad” for emerging projects, staking services, and an NFT marketplace. While the exact timeline for introducing these services in Japan remains undisclosed, Chino assured attendees that there would be a gradual roll-out in compliance with local regulations.The vision that has been set out will see a particular focus being placed on potential collaborations involving stablecoins. Elaborating further on the company’s plans, Chino outlined that domestic expansion would encompass equities management, leverage trading, and the integration of features present in Binance’s global version.In reporting on the event, local crypto media outlet Coinpost explained that Chino further expressed Binance Japan’s ambition to establish connections between its ecosystem and Japanese private entities and government bodies, going beyond the scope of crypto transactions.Focusing on stablecoinsCentral to this vision is the integration of stablecoins into the existing financial infrastructure, with active partnerships leveraging Binance’s technology stack and track record.Chino recognizes the recent regulatory developments regarding yen-based stablecoins as a positive development for business expansion. While Japan’s stablecoin issuance framework remains stringent, collaborations for joint developments are being considered. The potential of yen-backed stablecoins for trade settlements and programmable payments is also being explored.Expanding crypto asset offeringBinance Japan has already made a significant mark by managing 34 equities since its inception, establishing itself as a leader in the Japanese equities landscape. Notably, Binance’s native BNB (Build and Build) token and the Algorand ALGO token have made successful entries into the Japanese market.In its take on the online briefing, Bloomberg outlined that Chino has an initial target of one hundred crypto assets. The global version of the company offers in excess of 350 assets to its users. In adding new assets, a focus will be placed on those particular digital assets that resonate with Japanese market preferences.Other short-to-mid-term goals include facilitating Security Token Offering (STO) payments through stablecoins, merchant onboarding for “Binance Pay,” educational initiatives, among others.Binance Japan emerged following the acquisition by Binance of Sakura Exchange Bitcoin (SEBC), a local crypto exchange, in November of last year. A regulatory backlash following a number of high profile crypto platform failures in 2022 led to Japanese regulators issuing Binance with a warning letter for failing to attain full registration.A response to past difficulties in Japan, in particular relative to the failure of Mt.Gox in 2014, meant that crypto market traders were protected better by comparison with market participants overseas.

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

South Korean internet giant Naver has announced that it is monitoring and removing blog posts that promote unregistered virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Photo by Pixabay on PexelsUnregistered status makes promotions illegalAccording to Digital Asset, a Naver official said the practice reflects the fact that unregistered VASPs are subject to criminal penalties, meaning advertisements or promotional content related to them could potentially violate the law. This marks the first instance of Naver publicly confirming its stance on advertising for unregistered crypto platforms. The official noted that this measure had already been implemented before the financial regulator issued a press release in December warning of the illegality of such activities. In December, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) said that referral activities promoting unregistered VASPs through blogs and social media constitute an illegal crypto business. The regulatory clarification prompted influencers on platforms such as Telegram and YouTube to discontinue referral promotions related to these exchanges. Google Play to remove unregistered exchangesIn a parallel move, Google has revealed plans to cease support for unregistered crypto exchange apps on its Google Play Store. Google Korea said the decision was made voluntarily to align with its operational policy of complying with regulations in different jurisdictions. As a result, unregistered platforms will be removed from the Korean market in accordance with the FIU's regulatory rules. Beyond marketing restrictions, scrutiny of crypto exchanges is intensifying as the FSC moves to strengthen oversight. The regulator is reportedly devising a rule that would hold platforms liable for hacking incidents under a strict liability framework, meaning liability could be imposed even in the absence of negligence. According to MTN News, the financial authority is considering penalties of up to 10% of a platform’s revenue for such incidents. However, industry participants have argued that the proposed regulation is excessively harsh. One crypto industry source highlighted the disparity, pointing out that the potential 10% fine is more than three times higher than the maximum 3% penalty imposed on traditional fintech companies. Traditional finance eyes stablecoinsAmid this regulatory tightening, the traditional financial sector is positioning itself within the stablecoin segment. Banks are reportedly discussing whether to seek permission to offer yields on stablecoins, provided these fiat-pegged assets are issued by bank-led consortia. Citing industry sources, Electronic Times Internet reported that the Korea Federation of Banks (KFB) recently held a closed-door meeting with member institutions. The agenda focused on a coordinated response to upcoming regulations governing won-backed stablecoins, which form part of the second phase of South Korea’s digital asset legislation. Discussions included a review of the KFB’s ongoing research into won-backed stablecoins, commissioned to McKinsey & Company. The report, currently at its midpoint and scheduled for release in early February, will examine the feasibility of bank-led stablecoin issuance and explore potential use cases. This move is widely seen as an effort by the banking industry to secure customers and liquidity early on, while protecting its competitive advantage as a group of traditional lenders. The push by traditional financial institutions into stablecoin-related sectors is becoming increasingly concrete. According to another MTN News report, Shinhan Securities has formed a strategic partnership with Etherfuse, a tokenization platform that converts real-world assets (RWAs) into digital tokens. The partnership aims to collaborate on the issuance of "stablebonds" backed by government bonds. The planned issuance will use the ticker KTB, with Shinhan Securities acting as a brokerage responsible for securing and managing the underlying assets rather than serving as the issuer. Similarly, Hana Financial Group has established a stablecoin consortium including BNK Financial Group, iM Financial Group, Standard Chartered Bank Korea, and OK Savings Bank. According to local media outlet News1, the participants plan to raise funds to establish a special-purpose company that will later issue a stablecoin.These developments come as financial authorities move to use legislation to restrict early-stage stablecoin issuance to consortia in which banks hold at least a 50% stake plus one share, citing concerns over market stability.