Rotonda and Hancom Frontis Join Forces for Web3 Ecosystem Growth

Thailand has taken steps to tighten controls on digital asset mule accounts and overseas crypto peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms in an effort to combat cybercrime.Photo by Growtika on UnsplashLegislative amendmentsOn April 8, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a local regulator, published a statement explaining that the Thai cabinet has passed a resolution approving a number of amendments to the Southeast Asian nation’s digital asset business law and its cybercrime law. The regulator asserted that the amendments are designed to “strengthen measures against cybercrime and mule accounts, enhancing the security of public financial transactions and improving the effectiveness of combating online scams.” The amendments won’t become effective until such time as they are published in the Government Gazette of Thailand, an official public journal that acts as a primary source for Thai law. Mule accountsOne aspect that has been addressed is the enhancement of measures taken in an effort to block digital asset mule accounts. Criminals utilize mule accounts in an effort to launder the proceeds of crime.  While this happens with conventional bank accounts, it is also now happening with digital asset exchange accounts and digital asset wallets. Accounts may have been established for legitimate purposes but later fall under the influence of criminals who utilize them for money laundering. According to a report by the Bangkok Post last month, the Thai SEC had been collaborating with the Thai Digital Asset Operators Trade Association (TDO) and digital asset businesses in order to formulate these new measures.  The standard was also established following consultation with the Bank of Thailand, the Cyber Crime Investigation Bureau, Central Investigation Bureau, the Anti-Money Laundering Office and the Thai Bankers' Association. It is hoped that these enhanced mechanisms will lead to earlier detection of unusual customer behavior, enabling the authorities to intervene at an earlier stage to block mule accounts.Going forward, the regulator will collaborate with the TDO in monitoring and evaluating implementation of the new measures. Individuals who allow their digital asset accounts to be used by criminals will face up to three years' imprisonment and a fine of up to 300,000 Thai baht ($8,765). Blocking P2P platformsAnother change is being implemented in respect of offshore crypto P2P platforms. The objective of that particular measure is to deter and prevent the use of such platforms by investors within Thailand.  It’s envisaged that the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society will now be enabled to move more swiftly in blocking website and application access to these foreign P2P platforms. Such offshore platforms will be deemed to be attempting to solicit local investors if they offer payment options in Thai baht, provide online services or applications using the Thai language or if they accept payments through Thai bank accounts. Earlier this month, Thai law enforcement raided five unlicensed crypto firms. The raid led to the arrest of 11 individuals, charged with illegally operating e-money services related to enterprises responsible for a combined $29 million turnover. 

JD.com, one of China’s largest business-to-consumer (B2C) online retailers, is understood to have registered “JCOIN” and “JOYCOIN” ahead of Hong Kong’s Stablecoins Ordinance going live on Aug. 1. According to a report published by the Hong Kong Economic Times, in its trademark registration application, JD.com described the services associated with the two brand names as implicating the provision of electronic fund transfers and cryptocurrency-related financial transactions achieved via blockchain technology.Photo by tommao wang on UnsplashHKD-pegged stablecoinThe trademark registrations were filed by JD.com's subsidiary company, JD Coinlink Technology. The company was announced as a participant in the Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s (HKMA) stablecoin issuer sandbox last year. Around that timeframe, it also unveiled plans to launch a stablecoin pegged to the Hong Kong dollar (HKD).  That move was followed by British multinational bank Standard Chartered in February, with it announcing the launch of a HKD-pegged stablecoin in Hong Kong alongside local partners. Standard Chartered and its partners have also been participants in Hong Kong’s stablecoin issuer sandbox. Liu Peng, CEO of JD Coinlink Technology, provided an update in May, outlining that its stablecoin was entering phase two of sandbox testing. He stated that he hopes the project “contributes to payment efficiency not only within JD’s ecosystem but also for businesses and individuals worldwide.” On its website, JD Coinlink Technology describes its “JINGDONG Stablecoin” as a stablecoin backed 1:1 by the Hong Kong dollar, with the goal of meeting regulatory compliance and becoming “one of the leading digital currencies for businesses and individuals seeking for efficient, cost-effective, and secure payment solutions.” In a press briefing in Beijing in June, Peng outlined that the company was making preparations to apply for stablecoin issuer licensing in several markets. The JD Coinlink Technology CEO asserted that stablecoins “can reduce payment costs by 90% and complete transactions within 10 seconds.”  Ant Group, a subsidiary of another Chinese e-commerce giant, Alibaba, has also been following a similar track, preparing to apply for stablecoin licensing in both Hong Kong and Singapore. Push for yuan-pegged stablecoinsBoth Ant Group and JD.com have been lobbying the authorities in China for permission to issue a yuan-pegged stablecoin. Mainland China continues to impose a prohibition on crypto trading and mining, although more recently there have been signs that it may be considering accommodating stablecoins. Behind closed doors, it is understood that JD.com has urged officials at the People’s Bank of China to permit the issuance of offshore yuan-pegged stablecoins as a means to promote use of the yuan internationally and to enable more efficient cross-border trade. Hong Kong is perceived by many commentators as a testing ground for the digital assets sector in China. However, regulators in the Chinese autonomous territory have expressed caution around approving fiat-backed stablecoins tied to foreign currencies, noting that such issuances would require prior “discussions with the relevant authorities.” With Hong Kong’s Stablecoins Ordinance going live on Aug. 1, the HKMA published further guidelines for licensed stablecoin issuers on July 29. The regulator disclosed that it intends to publish a public registry of licensed stablecoin issuers for the benefit of the general public.

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.