Bitmain Planning Mining Equipment Support For Aleo Blockchain

Miracle Play and HG Ventures to lead global Web3 e-sports gaming industryWeb3 e-sports tournament platform Miracle Play has forged a partnership with Hangang (HG) Ventures, a venture capital firm committed to accelerating blockchain and Web3 projects, according to an official announcement on Miracle Play’s Medium page on Wednesday (KST). Miracle Play stated that it plans to go global to lead the Web3 e-sports market by leveraging HG Ventures’ global network and vast experience in project acceleration.Photo by ELLA DON on Unsplash“This partnership lays the foundation for us to become a global leader in the Web3 e-sports tournament market. We’re excited to leverage HG Ventures’ experience and global network to conquer the global market together,” said Miracle Play CEO Kim Hyun.Transforming gamingMiracle Play uses smart contract technology to ensure that anyone and everyone can hold various types of gaming tournaments in the form of PC, mobile, console and Web3 games. It is currently in the open beta phase, with a cumulative participation rate of about 30,000 players. Although it is only supported on Polygon as of now, it will eventually be available on a total of nine major networks including Avalanche, XPLA, Solana and more, to facilitate cross-network gaming tournaments that players from all over the world can participate in.The company also recently teamed up with interchain platform HAVAH to build a joint ecosystem.HG Ventures’ endeavorsHG Ventures is one of the largest blockchain VCs in Korea, with a portfolio consisting of multiple Play-to-Earn (P2E), NFT and Game-Fi startups. The company also serves as a bridgehead to help Korean companies go global and overseas companies enter Korea. Notably, the firm recently secured a conditional equity investment worth about KRW 130 billion from Mindfulness Capital Management.“Miracle Play, as a frontrunner in the Web3-based e-sports tournament platform, has immense potential in the global market, grounded in its core values of fairness and transparency. We’re committed to actively supporting their growth and global expansion,” said Sang-Woo Jeong, CEO of HG Ventures.

Hong Kong and Saudi Arabia Collaborate on Tokenization and PaymentsIn an effort to enhance financial collaboration, Hong Kong and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are expanding their ties and focusing on agreements related to tokenization and payments infrastructure.Photo by Ketut Subiyanto on PexelsBilateral meetingOn Wednesday, the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) held a bilateral meeting to discuss various initiatives aimed at integrating financial services between the two nations. During the meeting, the central banks explored areas such as financial infrastructure development, open market operations, market connectivity, and sustainable development. Additionally, they signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) to facilitate joint discussions on financial innovation.HKMA chief executive Eddie Yue emphasized the potential for cooperation in fields like economy, trade, sustainable development, finance, and fintech between the two nations. He expressed optimism about the continued development of the relationship and the prospects it holds for the future.SAMA governor Ayman Al-Sayari echoed this sentiment, acknowledging the significance of the MoU in fostering stronger ties and assisting them in the future. “HKMA is an important partner for the Saudi Central Bank. Today’s MoU will support our relationship and contribute to the consolidation of efforts in developing the Fintech industry,” he stated.Tokenization and payment infrastructureNotably, the authorities of Hong Kong and Saudi Arabia also used the opportunity to exchange expertise in tokenization, payment infrastructure, and supervision technologies. This collaboration opens up possibilities for both countries to leverage each other’s strengths in these areas.Hong Kong has been actively participating in various inter-jurisdictional tokenization initiatives. In June, the Bank of China’s investment bank subsidiary, BOCI, issued a $28 million tokenized security in Hong Kong using the Ethereum blockchain. The project utilized Goldman Sachs’ tokenization protocol GS DAP and featured cash tokens representing claims on the Hong Kong dollar.Digital assets firm Ripple Labs has also participated in a HKMA pilot program that implicates real estate tokenization.No crypto discussionHowever, the joint announcement did not explicitly mention any joint efforts related to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. It is worth noting that Hong Kong recently allowed retail investors to trade crypto, but Saudi Arabia has not shown any specific plans to promote cryptocurrencies in recent years. In 2019, the Saudi Central Bank issued a warning that Bitcoin is not recognized by legal entities within the country.International collaborationRecent months have seen ever greater collaboration between international central banks and regulators relative to digital assets. Last month Japan’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) joined forces with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) on its Project Guardian initiative to further explore the potential of digital assets.In May, the central banks of Hong Kong and the United Arab Emirates announced a collaboration to work on cryptocurrency regulations and financial technology development. In the same month, MAS partnered with New York’s Federal Reserve Bank on an initiative that examined the use of central bank digital currency (CBDC) for wholesale cross-border payments.As the financial collaboration between Hong Kong and Saudi Arabia strengthens and other such international partnerships continue to unfold, the focus on tokenization and payment infrastructure and digital assets more broadly signifies a step forward in embracing these innovative financial technologies.

South Korean FIU rejects Hanbitco’s bid to become fiat-to-crypto exchangeWhile numerous cryptocurrency-only exchanges in Korea have been vying for registration as fiat-to-crypto exchanges with the financial regulator, the government has turned down another platform’s attempt to achieve this status.Photo by Dim Hou on UnsplashUnmet standardsAccording to a report from local news provider MoneyToday, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) recently convened a committee that decided against approving Hanbitco’s request to change its business status. Industry sources suggest that this decision was based on Hanbitco’s inability to meet the standards set by the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, often referred to as the Financial Transaction Reporting Act.Fine and cautionary orderA person familiar with the matter that the committee started deliberating on Hanbitco’s request to alter its business status about two weeks ago and ultimately decided against it. A significant factor in this decision might have been the KRW 2 billion ($1.49 million) fine levied on Hanbitco, stemming from numerous violations found in recent on-site inspections, the source added.Before approaching the FIU with its request, Hanbitco formed a partnership with Kwangju Bank in June to obtain real-name accounts, facilitating Korean won deposits and withdrawals. Achieving this is quite uncommon for a crypto-only exchange. In Korea, exchanges are legally required to have real-name bank accounts for trading in Korean won. Presently, only five platforms hold registration as fiat-to-crypto exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax, each having its own banking partnership.As per the details released by the FIU, besides the levied fine, Hanbitco was issued a cautionary order, and five of its employees faced reprimands.The fine of KRW 2 billion is the heaviest handed out to a virtual asset service provider from on-site inspections held between last year and the first half of this year. For perspective, Upbit, the country’s largest crypto exchange, was fined KRW 80 million.An FIU representative noted that during the evaluation of Hanbitco’s application to transition into a fiat-to-crypto exchange, factors such as the firm’s anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, its internal control systems and past sanctions played a role in the decision-making process.