South Korean FIU rejects Hanbitco’s bid to become fiat-to-crypto exchange

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po said digital assets should support the real economy, but only within a framework of strong safeguards to protect financial stability, market integrity, and investors.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashAccording to the South China Morning Post, Chan addressed a closed-door workshop on Jan. 20, where he highlighted the advantages of digital assets, including greater transparency, improved risk management, and more efficient capital movement. Reviewing milestones in the city’s crypto sector, Chan said that since 2023, Hong Kong has issued three tranches of tokenized green bonds worth a combined $2.1 billion. He also pointed to a Hong Kong Monetary Authority pilot launched last November that enables real-value transactions using tokenized deposits and digital assets. Chan added that the city’s stablecoin licensing regime is progressing, with the first licenses expected in the first quarter. Same risks, same regulationsWhile emphasizing the necessity of financial innovation, Chan highlighted Hong Kong’s regulatory philosophy, which dictates that identical activities posing identical risks must be subject to identical regulations. He explained that this approach is designed to promote healthy, responsible, and sustainable sector development, reiterating that protective measures against financial instability remain mandatory. As Hong Kong officials continue to promote the city’s digital asset push on the international stage, a local industry body has cautioned that proposed licensing frameworks for crypto trading, advisory, and management services may have unintended consequences if rolled out without transitional measures. Industry group calls for grace periodAccording to Cointelegraph, the Hong Kong Securities & Futures Professionals Association (HKSFPA) said in a submission to regulators that existing market participants could be compelled to halt operations under the new rules unless a grace period is provided. The association called for a transitional deeming arrangement of six to 12 months for firms that file licence applications before the regulations formally take effect. No definitive start date has been set for the planned virtual asset regulatory regimes, which remain under consultation. Two days before issuing those comments, the HKSFPA had cautioned that the planned introduction of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Crypto Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and related Common Reporting Standard (CRS) amendments could create new operational and legal risks for local firms. The group said it supported the policy direction in principle but warned that uncapped per-account penalties and open-ended director liability could raise compliance risks, urging regulators to introduce clear caps and legal safeguards. The association also called for lighter requirements for entities with no reportable activity, the development of data file preparation tools from both the industry and the Inland Revenue Department (IRD), and the ability to transfer record-keeping responsibilities to third parties upon dissolution. Elsewhere in the region, Japan implemented the CARF on Jan. 1, 2026. Users of Japanese exchanges must now declare tax residence, while operators are required to submit transaction data—including trading volumes and asset breakdowns—to tax authorities by April 30 of the following year. Data regarding non-resident users is expected to be shared with foreign authorities under international agreements. Other jurisdictions are following suit, with India planning to adopt the framework by 2027. 

BOK Staffers Assess Crypto Market Vulnerabilities and Their ImplicationsOn Thursday, the Bank of Korea’s (BOK) staff members published an assessment of the vulnerabilities in the cryptocurrency market and their potential implications. Here is the summary of the report.Photo by D Tan on Unsplash2022 crypto winterThroughout 2022, the worldwide crypto market faced a series of adverse occurrences, such as significant drops in the prices of major crypto-assets and the collapse of prominent crypto companies. These events shed light on the vulnerabilities that had accumulated during the rapid growth of the market.The first major event occurred in May 2022 when the algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD experienced a sharp decline, resulting in substantial losses and bankruptcies for numerous retail investors and crypto firms. This incident significantly eroded confidence in the overall crypto market. The subsequent bankruptcies of prominent crypto lender Celsius and hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) further highlighted the realization of risks commonly associated with traditional financial markets, such as multiple collateral loans and maturity and liquidity mismatches, within the crypto market.In November 2022, the well-known crypto exchange FTX filed for bankruptcy, demonstrating that the activities of a large crypto company can propagate risks through moral hazard and excessive profit-seeking behavior when it operates outside the realm of regulatory oversight.Similarities with TradFiThese negative events that unfolded in the global crypto market in 2022 share similarities with issues previously observed in financial markets, such as unsustainable business models, liquidity risk, leverage, and lack of transparency in financial conditions. These parallels suggest that if the crypto markets were subjected to comparable levels of regulation as traditional financial markets, it is plausible that the triggering of these risks could have been avoided altogether, or at the very least, the resulting damage could have been mitigated to some extent.Implications for the Korean marketAt present, it is deemed unlikely that events akin to those witnessed in overseas crypto markets will transpire in the Korean market. The Korean crypto-asset market has primarily evolved through exchanges, with limited influence from other enterprises such as crypto issuers and decentralized lending platforms. In addition, Korean crypto exchanges are subject to regulation under the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information. This mandates the separation of customer deposits from exchange assets and the strict management of custodial crypto-assets through secure wallets. Additionally, Korean exchanges are prohibited from listing their own tokens on their platforms.However, there remains a dearth of information regarding the business structures of crypto companies that offer services similar to those in the traditional financial industry. This lack of information poses challenges in accurately assessing risk and providing adequate investor protection. Meanwhile, there is a potential for a deeper integration between the crypto market and users’ daily lives, particularly through major technology companies, gaming companies, and security tokens.SuggestionsIt is vital to ensure that crypto-assets are regulated based on the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” through the ongoing development of crypto-asset-related legislation. The Financial Stability Board, an international body monitoring the global financial system, explained this principle in a 2022 paper: “Where crypto-assets and intermediaries perform an equivalent economic function to one performed by instruments and intermediaries of the traditional financial sector, they should be subject to equivalent regulation.”Additionally, it is necessary to stay aligned with major countries in terms of the speed and comprehensiveness of regulatory measures to prevent regulatory discrepancies across borders due to the global nature of crypto risks.Enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of regulation requires the establishment and maintenance of a close cooperation system between authorities. This collaborative effort should encompass various aspects, including monitoring, information gathering, and supervision of the crypto-asset market. Notably, the widespread adoption of stablecoins can affect the stability of the overall financial system, including monetary systems and payment and settlement systems. Hence, it is necessary to strengthen the involvement of central banks in the monitoring and supervision framework for crypto-assets, including stablecoins, as demonstrated by legislative approaches adopted by major economies like the EU. Furthermore, imposing disclosure requirements, external audits, and documentation submission obligations on crypto-asset operators is advisable.

The governor of South Korea's Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) met with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler, according to Korean media outlet Newsis. The meeting took place during FSS Governor Lee Bok-hyun's business trip to the U.S. The meeting with the SEC chair was pre-arranged earlier this year, as previously reported by crypto media CoinNess.  Governor Lee reportedly had high-ranking meetings with officials from the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) between May 14 and May 16. Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashDuring his meeting with the SEC chair, Governor Lee discussed various financial and cryptocurrency regulatory issues including the recent approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs, and reaffirmed the need for close cooperation between two countries in such oversight efforts. In particular, the two regulators came to an agreement to reinforce cooperation in investigation into unfair trading practices associated with securities and virtual assets. He also met with CFTC Chairman Rostin Behnam to share the recent trends regarding virtual asset legislation in the U.S. and agreed to strengthen information sharing between the two countries. The details of the meeting agendas remain confidential, as mutually agreed upon by the two supervisory organizations.   International financial regulatory cooperation Governor Lee’s latest meetings with U.S. financial regulators followed his attendance at the meeting for the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS) held in Basel, Switzerland, on May 13. The GHOS is the oversight body of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS).  During the GHOS meeting, participants reached a consensus on the urgency of swiftly implementing Basel III, a set of bank regulation standards. Two-thirds of member countries are set to partially or completely adopt Basel III by the end of this year.  Furthermore, the member countries agreed to postpone the implementation of the Prudential Treatment of Banks' Exposures to Cryptoassets to Jan.1, 2026, considering the regulatory framework is currently under amendment.