Korea’s ABB Joins Hands with Vietnam’s DTS Group for Web3 Development

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto marketSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency derivatives platform Bitget has made a decision to permanently exit the Hong Kong market, discontinuing its efforts to obtain a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license.Photo by SHUJA OFFICIAL on UnsplashBitgetX platform shutdownThe decision comes only months after it had introduced its BitgetX platform to comply with local regulations. The company, which bases its operations out of Singapore, is a well-known entity in the crypto space, renowned as the operator of the 12th-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally in terms of 24-hour trading volume. It made this revelation on Monday, citing what it referred to as “business and market-related considerations.”In a published statement, the company said:”With a heavy heart, we regret to inform you that due to business and market related considerations, we have decided not to pursue a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license in Hong Kong. As a result of this decision, the BitgetX website (www.BitgetX.hk) will cease its operations effective December 13, 2023. At the same time, Bitgetx.hk will permanently exit the Hong Kong market.”While outlining that BitgetX will close its doors, the firm urged users to withdraw their assets beforehand. Bitget is among a handful of exchanges that had publicly expressed their intent to secure a license following Hong Kong’s proactive push over the course of the past year to embrace the virtual asset sector.Broader challengesThe decision to abandon the pursuit of a VATP license echoes the broader challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. Despite the city’s recent enthusiastic regulatory embrace of the virtual asset sector, a number of stumbling blocks remain.High compliance costs and the lingering aftermath of the JPEX financial scandal have hindered Hong Kong’s aspirations to establish itself as a leading crypto hub. A report back in June identified the major cost implications of acquiring a license in Hong Kong. At the time, it was estimated that the required spend to obtain a VATP license could range from $2.55 million to $25.5 million.Banking crypto companies has also become a major bottleneck. In June, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urged banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China to bank the crypto sector, having identified a reluctance amongst them to do so.Limited interestThe forthcoming closure of BitgetX adds to a growing trend of limited interest in Hong Kong’s new licensing scheme. Only five companies, all local, have submitted applications for virtual asset licenses to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This list began publication in response to the JPEX scandal, which significantly damaged public trust in virtual assets.The challenges faced by the industry go beyond regulatory hurdles. The damaged public trust, coupled with the high-profile exit of JPEX, has contributed to the hesitancy of international crypto platforms in pursuing licenses in Hong Kong. The abrupt withdrawal of Bitget raises questions about the viability of Hong Kong as a central player in the cryptocurrency industry and underscores the complexities faced by exchanges navigating the evolving landscape of the digital asset sector.

Newly founded bankruptcy claim trading platform OPNX has provided further details about the entities backing the fledgling startup. Taking to Twitter on Friday, Open Exchange CEO Leslie Lamb outlined a number of venture capital backers, with a mixture of international and Asia-centric firms among them. Global backersLamb’s tweet via the firm’s official Twitter account, together with a similar announcement published to the firm’s website, outlined AppWorks, a leading Taiwanese venture capital firm and startup accelerator, as an investor in the company. Other Asian backers include Hong Kong-based crypto fund, Token Bay Capital and the Hong Kong-based arm of one of China’s largest banks, China Merchant Bank International.With the firm based in Dubai, Middle-Eastern interest is represented through the involvement of Saudi digital asset fund, Tuwaiq Limited. Otherwise, the company lists a number of other international backers, including US equity options exchange MIAX Group, DeFi-focused venture and trading firm Nascent, top tier global venture capital firm Susquehanna and the investment arm of market maker and early stage investor, DRW. Questionable founding teamOnly hours after the disclosure by Open Exchange, DRW reached out to CoinDesk to confirm that it is not an investor in the bankruptcy claims exchange. Nascent and Susquehanna also denied that they are involved. The companies are still being listed by OPNX as backers of the project on its website.The launch of OPNX has been mired in controversy from the outset as its founding team includes the founders of the former crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) which failed spectacularly in 2022. Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the founders of 3AC are now the founders behind OPNX. Before their involvement, OPNX was preceded by Seychelles-based crypto yield platform CoinFLEX. That business also failed during the 2022 crypto bear market. It entered into a restructuring process with the consent of the courts in the Seychelles. Emerging from it is OPNX with the 3AC duo of Zhu and Davies having gotten involved at that point. Industry push-backMany in the crypto space have been highly critical of the development of OPNX on the basis of the involvement of both Zhu and Davies. The duo are being blamed for the collapse of the crypto hedge fund due to mismanagement and the knock on effects the firm’s demise had on other entities within crypto. Many of the series of crypto lenders who failed at a later stage in 2022 had major exposure to the wayward hedge fund.There had been some speculation as to who was backing the new project. Earlier this month, BitMEX co-founder and former CEO Arthur Hayes claimed that the 3AC duo had received substantial funding from Bahrain’s sovereign wealth fund to establish the project. In February, Hayes suggested that the crypto bull market must be starting based on news of Zhu and Davies wanting to launch the OPNX platform.Crypto-focused venture capitalist Michael Arrington also spoke out around that time, stating on Twitter, that 3AC founders successfully raising capital for their latest venture was “the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.”Upon its launch earlier this month, industry commentators quickly declared the project a flop citing a trading volume of $13.64 on its first day of trading. Five days in, OPNX made light of the situation, declaring a win on the basis that it had progressed to $12,398 in trading volume, representing a 90,000% increase in trading.Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) issued an investor and marketplace alert on April 12 stating that while OPNX may be Dubai-based, it is not regulated by VARA and instead operates on an unregulated basis. It warned investors against using any unregulated crypto entity.

In a recent blog post, Christopher Hui, Hong Kong's Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB), announced a stringent deadline for unlicensed virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to submit licensing applications, as well as outlining the intention to develop a regulatory framework for over-the-counter (OTC) venues.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashUnlicensed VASP deadlineThe Hong Kong government's financial services department has set Feb. 29 as the cutoff date for applications from VASPs that are currently unregistered and unregulated. Those not approved must cease operations by May 31. The move comes as the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) established a licensing system for VASPs, acknowledging a transitional period for those operating before its implementation. Midway through last year, the SFC issued a stern warning to unlicensed crypto trading platforms engaging in what it termed as “improper practices.” Hui emphasized that VASPs wishing to continue operations in Hong Kong must submit their license applications by the end of this month. Failure to meet the relevant requirements outlined by the SFC could result in the issuance of a "no-deeming notice" for existing service providers. This notice mandates that they must halt operations either by May 31 or three months after receiving the notice. Service providers failing to submit their applications by the February deadline are also expected to cease operations by the end of May. As the deadline approaches, Hui highlighted that the SFC is actively preparing for enforcement work, including issuing notices to disapproved service providers and intensifying publicity efforts. Proposed regulatory framework for OTCsHighlighting the specific role OTC venues played in some fraud cases involving unlicensed VASPs in 2023, Hui announced that the SFC plans to launch a consultation on a proposed regulatory framework for OTC crypto venues. The consultation will encompass virtual-asset outlets, including shops and online platforms. Hui emphasized the necessity of regulating OTC venues to prevent investor deception and protect against fraudulent activities. This move aligns with Hong Kong's ongoing efforts to create a vibrant sector and ecosystem for virtual assets. The city implemented a licensing regime for crypto companies in June of the previous year, with companies requiring approval before June of the current year to continue operations. Cautioning investorsHui also took the opportunity to caution investors about the volatility and value of virtual assets. He stressed that many digital assets lack intrinsic value and exhibit price volatility, urging investors to thoroughly understand details and assess associated risks before engaging in related investments. Furthermore, Hui emphasized that only platforms officially licensed by the SFC should be used for virtual asset transactions. Additionally, Hong Kong is exploring a regulatory regime for stablecoin issuers, proposing that fiat-backed stablecoin issuers obtain a license from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. As Hong Kong strengthens its regulatory framework, it aims to create a secure and compliant environment for the evolving landscape of virtual assets.