GDAC Joins Hands with Bitgo to Fortify Crypto Wallet Security

China Launches National Blockchain Center to Develop TalentHaving initially been announced in February, China’s National Blockchain Technology Innovation Center was formally launched on Wednesday. The center is based in China’s capital city of Beijing, and plans to collaborate with existing crypto and blockchain businesses, think tanks that concern themselves with blockchain and digital assets, and local universities in an effort to further advance blockchain technology within China’s borders.Photo by Hanson Lu on UnsplashEnterprise blockchain developmentEncompassed within the National Blockchain Technology Innovation Center lies the Beijing Academy of Blockchain and Edge Computing. The academy’s leading achievement to date has been its development of the ChainMaker blockchain. The state-sponsored blockchain incorporates clusters of high performance servers of 1,000 units or more, and it claims to achieve a throughput of 240 million transactions per second.The blockchain is being geared towards enterprise use, and the sharing of information between businesses. The ChainMaker project team has also developed an immutable storage mechanism called “Hong”. It’s understood that the team plans to open-source that technology in due course. The storage system is being used by around 80 government departments in Beijing to collect and store data.ChainMaker is collaborating with fifty corporations, with most of them being state-owned entities.Linking up separate networksIn these efforts to advance China’s blockchain sector, the Center is being backed by China’s Ministry of Science and Technology. One of its key objectives is to ensure that the research center enables a comprehensive, nation-wide network to link together disparate blockchain systems, including those already built, within China. Furthermore, the Chinese authorities want the Center to support existing industries, serving them by bringing blockchain technology to their operations, and in that way advancing businesses with that added competitive edge.Zheng Zhiming, a leading academic at the Chinese Academy of Sciences said that existing blockchain projects are isolated from each other. Zhiming believes that this is holding them back, impeding their growth. This latest approach through the National Blockchain Technology Center is geared to address that shortcoming.It’s interesting to note that while the Chinese authorities have taken a very hard line in relation to cryptocurrencies, they are very much trying to advance their blockchain sector. Likewise, they are pulling out the stops for China’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) project, the digital yuan or e-CNY.It emerged last week that the Bank of China has partnered with French international banking group BNP Paribas, in an effort to promote further use of the digital yuan among the bank’s corporate clients.A dual strategyMeanwhile in China’s autonomous territory of Hong Kong, the city has been given an implicit mandate from the Chinese central government to open its doors to cryptocurrency-related businesses. Cleverly, the Chinese are covering both eventualities. While they don’t want citizens within mainland China to have access to decentralized cryptocurrencies and dApps, they still don’t want to miss out on any upside that the technology and its innovation may bring.On that basis, Hong Kong has been given the space and freedom to compete for crypto business on a global basis, competing in that respect with other emerging centers such as Singapore and Dubai.

It's been nearly ten years since the infamous collapse of the Japanese bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, with some creditors of the defunct business now claiming to have finally received their long-awaited repayments.Photo by Su San Lee on UnsplashSubreddit payment confirmationsTestimonies shared on the Mt.Gox creditor subreddit and a dedicated Telegram channel reveal that certain payments, in the form of Japanese yen, have been distributed to creditors who opted for PayPal as their preferred mode of receipt. Excitement marked the early stages of this repayment process. Users on Reddit joyfully shared their experiences, with one exclaiming:"I got money!! I just got my initial payment via Paypal!!"This development comes after Mt.Gox rehabilitation trustee, Nobuaki Kobayashi, had previously extended the repayment deadline from Oct. 31, 2023, to Oct. 31, 2024. However, last month, Kobayashi informed creditors that certain cash repayments would be initiated before the year's end. Despite efforts to expedite the process, the sheer volume of creditors and the complexities involved mean that repayments will continue into 2024. The collapse of Mt.Gox in early 2014 triggered global regulatory responses and initiated a nearly decade-long bankruptcy and corporate rehabilitation process. The exchange fell victim to a series of hacks between 2011 and 2014, leaving a lasting impact on the cryptocurrency landscape. The commencement of repayments has been hanging over the crypto market for many years, with many fearing that the process may have a dampening effect on the bitcoin unit price, given that funds are being distributed in Japanese yen and bitcoin. Earlier this year, the U.S. government indicted two Russian nationals for laundering funds stolen from Mt.Gox, shedding light on the enduring legal ramifications stemming from the exchange's demise. Double payment glitchHowever, it appears the process encountered some glitches, as other Reddit posts indicated that a few creditors received double payments via PayPal, adding a new layer of complexity to the already intricate Mt. Gox saga. Reddit users, such as u/rlycreativename, have shared emails they claim to have received from the Mt.Gox Rehabilitation Trustee. The emails acknowledge a system issue leading to inadvertent double transfers and legally obligate recipients to return the surplus amount. While some users have complied with the request and returned the duplicated funds, others have expressed hesitancy, citing the historical challenges creditors faced in obtaining their money. The situation has evoked discussions on Reddit, with users debating whether the Trust deserves a swift return, considering the prolonged struggle creditors endured to reclaim their funds. While it may be tempting for some creditors to hold on to the duplicate payment, such a decision may only serve to heap more misery on long-suffering Mt.Gox creditors. The recent case of Jatinder Singh and Thevamanogari Manivel would be very relevant for creditors to consider. Singh was a customer of well-known digital assets platform Crypto.com. In 2021 the firm inadvertently transferred $10 million to his account. Singh conspired with Manivel to withdraw and keep the funds. A community corrections order of 18 months has been imposed on Manivel in Australia while Singh will be sentenced in February.  

Terraform Labs civil trial proceeds with confidential filingsSingaporean blockchain development firm Terraform Labs, the creator of the failed Terra blockchain protocol, has reached an agreement on a protective order in their ongoing civil case with the United States’ Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Photo by Thomas Habr on UnsplashData shielded from public disclosureThe decision, sanctioned by the U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday, ensures that materials marked as confidential by the involved parties will remain shielded from public disclosure. The court is obligated to seal any discovery filings labeled confidential ahead of the trial.Judge Rakoff conveyed his likelihood of denying requests to unseal these confidential documents, although the order did not delve into the specific rationale for maintaining their confidential status beyond citing “good cause.” The finalized agreement on this protective order took place on Dec. 18, with legal representatives from both the SEC and Terraform Labs, including co-founder Do Kwon, giving their consent. Kwon, presently detained in Montenegro, faces potential extradition to the United States or South Korea.Pivotal momentThe depegging of Terraform’s stablecoin TerraUSD (UST) from the U.S. dollar marked a turning point in the cryptocurrency sector. This event is believed to have significantly contributed to the crypto market downturn in 2022, as it had a knock-on effect on countless other crypto businesses and platforms that were over-exposed to the flawed algorithmic currency.That chain of events led to the SEC taking action after the fact. However, it has subsequently also pursued a much criticized “regulation by enforcement” policy relative to the crypto sector. To that end, the Commission has pending cases against Coinbase, Ripple, Kraken and Binance, among others.In February, the SEC accused Terraform Labs and Do Kwon of conducting a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud by offering and selling unregistered securities. As proceedings have unfolded, both Terraform and the SEC have traded unsuccessful attempts to obtain summary judgment.Far-reaching consequencesThe ongoing SEC vs. Terraform civil case carries potential far-reaching consequences in terms of legal precedents within the cryptocurrency sector. In a separate ruling in August, the court allowed Terra to issue subpoenas to FTX entities as part of FTX’s bankruptcy proceedings. Judge Rakoff, in November, accepted confidential materials from Jump Crypto Holdings for discovery in this case.Troubled crypto lender Genesis Trading has also been tangled up in the proceedings with the courts directing it to comply with a subpoena initiated by Terraform Labs. The outcome of this case is poised to offer essential legal guidance for numerous companies operating in the crypto space.The SEC’s regulatory approach toward cryptocurrency firms in the United States has been subject to considerable debate and criticism. The commission’s alleged “regulation by enforcement” strategy, especially in dealings with major players in the crypto industry, has drawn accusations.While many in the U.S. have been unhappy with “regulation by enforcement,” the upside is that over the longer haul, the courts will be able to eventually furnish the regulatory clarity that the SEC refuses to provide. The ongoing scrutiny of regulatory approaches and the outcomes of cases like Terraform Labs vs. SEC will undoubtedly shape the future legal landscape of the cryptocurrency industry.