Top

Terraform Labs Accuses Citadel Securities of Stablecoin Sabotage

Policy & Regulation·October 14, 2023, 12:28 AM

Terraform Labs, the bankrupt Singaporean blockchain firm, is pointing fingers at American market maker Citadel Securities, alleging that it played a role in an orchestrated effort to destabilize Terraform’s TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin back in May 2022.

In its pursuit of justice, Terraform Labs has now called upon the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida to compel Citadel Securities to furnish vital documents concerning their trading activities during that critical period, when the stablecoin underwent a depegging crisis, now referred to as TerraUSD Classic (USTC).

Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

 

Allegations of intentional destabilization

That’s according to a motion filed by Terraform in the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida, earlier this week. As alleged by Terraform Labs, the catastrophic depegging event in May 2022, which saw UST plummet from $1 to a mere $0.02, was not solely due to inherent instability in the algorithm supporting the UST stablecoin. Instead, the firm contends that it was a result of the deliberate and collaborative actions of specific third-party market participants who engaged in “shorting” to trigger the depegging.

Terraform stated in its motion:

“Movant [Terraform] contends that the market destabilization that occurred did not result from instability in the algorithm underlying the UST stablecoin. Instead, Movant contends that the market was destabilized due to the concerted, intentional effort of certain third party market participants to ‘short’ and cause UST to depeg from its one dollar price.”

The motion also alludes to “publicly available evidence” hinting at Citadel’s intention to short the stablecoin at the time of the depegging event. In particular, it references a Discord channel chat screenshot where a pseudonymous trader purportedly had a conversation with Citadel head Ken Griffin. Griffin allegedly remarked:

“They were going to Soros the f*** out of Luna UST,” seemingly drawing a connection to George Soros’ trading strategies, which often involve highly leveraged, one-way bets.

 

Citadel refuted allegations previously

Notably, Citadel Securities has previously refuted allegations of trading the TerraUSD stablecoin in May 2022, according to Forbes.

In its motion, Terraform refers to the importance of these documents for its defense in a lawsuit filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February. The SEC lawsuit alleges that Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, played a significant role in orchestrating a multi-billion dollar cryptocurrency securities fraud.

The motion concludes with Terraform arguing that its defense would be substantially hampered if Citadel Securities were to successfully withhold the requested information. In the event that the court fails to compel Citadel, Terraform has requested that the matter be transferred to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The matter has been the subject of debate within the crypto community in recent months. In May a community member stated:

“As I’ve been saying. People blamed Citadel et al. This was nothing but a rug pull. Wake up. Do Kwon says the dissolving of Terraform Labs in Korea days before the $LUNA and $UST crash is ‘purely coincidental.’”

With the matter now being raised in the courts, it looks like the legal system will be the final adjudicator regarding the issue.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Aug 14, 2023

RaonSecure to Develop Digital Identity Strategy for the Indonesian Government

RaonSecure to Develop Digital Identity Strategy for the Indonesian GovernmentRaonSecure, a South Korea-based decentralized identity (DID) service provider utilizing blockchain technology, has secured a contract with the Korea-Indonesia e-Government Cooperation Center. The contract involves providing consultation services aimed at devising a strategy for the implementation of a digital identity system in Indonesia. The selection of RaonSecure as the contract winner was orchestrated by Korea’s National Information Society Agency (NIA), and this strategic venture is being executed through the bilateral center.Photo by Ben Sweet on UnsplashBilateral center fostering tech exchangeEstablished in Jakarta in 2016, the bilateral center aims to facilitate the exchange of technological expertise between the Korean government and its Indonesian counterpart. This organization also serves to accelerate the entry of Korean enterprises into the Southeast Asian market.Indonesia’s national service portalAs the Indonesian government looks forward to establishing a national service portal, the need for a robust national digital identity system has been growing. This system is envisaged to support functionalities such as user authentication, e-signatures, and privacy protection.Blockchain-based DID implementationIn light of these needs, RaonSecure has emerged as a suitable company for the project, showcasing its technological prowess and stability. The Korean tech firm’s expertise has been evident in the successful deployment of its blockchain-powered DID platform, OmniOne, across diverse organizational settings. Noteworthy deployments include providing OmniOne for the issuance of identification cards to government employees, licensed drivers, and military veterans. Furthermore, RaonSecure has recently partnered with the Korea Federation of Savings Banks (KFSB) to develop a solution that verifies bank customers’ identities using mobile ID cards.The Indonesian venture is encouraging development for RaonSecure as it will serve as a gateway to not only fostering its presence within Southeast Asia but also propelling its reach far beyond, and the company’s blockchain DID technology will play a key role in spearheading this expansion into new horizons.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 31, 2023

Korean Financial Authority Installs Report Center to Counter Crypto Scams

Korean Financial Authority Installs Report Center to Counter Crypto ScamsThe Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) announced today that it has installed a dedicated report center aimed at combating investment fraud related to virtual assets. From June 1 through to the end of this year, the report center will run a reporting campaign.Photo by Katrin Hauf on UnsplashSurge in crypto fraud casesWhile the National Assembly is working on the legislation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill, there has been a surge in fraudulent activities exploiting regulatory loopholes. According to the FSS, the number of reported cases of crypto fraudulent activities in Korea surged by 67.2% last year, reaching 199, compared to the previous year’s 119.In a proactive response to this rising concern, the FSS has set up a report center, designed to staunch the escalating tide of fraud.Coordinated efforts against financial fraudUnder the guidance of the Anti-Financial Fraud Office, the report center will operate collaboratively with other relevant departments, such as the Consumer Finance Department and the Asset Management Examination Department. Reports can be filed either via landline or through the FSS website.Swift actions on detected fraudAs part of its policy, the FSS will swiftly inform investigative agencies, like the prosecutors’ office, if an issue raised via the report center is deemed severe or contains specific facts that necessitate further scrutiny.The financial watchdog emphasized its commitment to issuing financial consumer warnings whenever potential fraud is detected and poses a risk to investors. This strategy is designed to safeguard investors and impede the spread of damages.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 22, 2023

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto Risks

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.

news
Loading