Top

Terraform Labs Accuses Citadel Securities of Stablecoin Sabotage

Policy & Regulation·October 14, 2023, 12:28 AM

Terraform Labs, the bankrupt Singaporean blockchain firm, is pointing fingers at American market maker Citadel Securities, alleging that it played a role in an orchestrated effort to destabilize Terraform’s TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin back in May 2022.

In its pursuit of justice, Terraform Labs has now called upon the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida to compel Citadel Securities to furnish vital documents concerning their trading activities during that critical period, when the stablecoin underwent a depegging crisis, now referred to as TerraUSD Classic (USTC).

Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

 

Allegations of intentional destabilization

That’s according to a motion filed by Terraform in the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida, earlier this week. As alleged by Terraform Labs, the catastrophic depegging event in May 2022, which saw UST plummet from $1 to a mere $0.02, was not solely due to inherent instability in the algorithm supporting the UST stablecoin. Instead, the firm contends that it was a result of the deliberate and collaborative actions of specific third-party market participants who engaged in “shorting” to trigger the depegging.

Terraform stated in its motion:

“Movant [Terraform] contends that the market destabilization that occurred did not result from instability in the algorithm underlying the UST stablecoin. Instead, Movant contends that the market was destabilized due to the concerted, intentional effort of certain third party market participants to ‘short’ and cause UST to depeg from its one dollar price.”

The motion also alludes to “publicly available evidence” hinting at Citadel’s intention to short the stablecoin at the time of the depegging event. In particular, it references a Discord channel chat screenshot where a pseudonymous trader purportedly had a conversation with Citadel head Ken Griffin. Griffin allegedly remarked:

“They were going to Soros the f*** out of Luna UST,” seemingly drawing a connection to George Soros’ trading strategies, which often involve highly leveraged, one-way bets.

 

Citadel refuted allegations previously

Notably, Citadel Securities has previously refuted allegations of trading the TerraUSD stablecoin in May 2022, according to Forbes.

In its motion, Terraform refers to the importance of these documents for its defense in a lawsuit filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February. The SEC lawsuit alleges that Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, played a significant role in orchestrating a multi-billion dollar cryptocurrency securities fraud.

The motion concludes with Terraform arguing that its defense would be substantially hampered if Citadel Securities were to successfully withhold the requested information. In the event that the court fails to compel Citadel, Terraform has requested that the matter be transferred to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The matter has been the subject of debate within the crypto community in recent months. In May a community member stated:

“As I’ve been saying. People blamed Citadel et al. This was nothing but a rug pull. Wake up. Do Kwon says the dissolving of Terraform Labs in Korea days before the $LUNA and $UST crash is ‘purely coincidental.’”

With the matter now being raised in the courts, it looks like the legal system will be the final adjudicator regarding the issue.

More to Read
View All
Markets·

May 16, 2025

Tokyo's Relic launches fan-driven anime project using NFT and blockchain

Relic, a Tokyo-based provider of business co-creation services, has launched a fan-driven short anime project using NFT and blockchain technology in collaboration with MetaMe, a metacommunication service developed by mobile carrier NTT Docomo.Photo by Dex Ezekiel on UnsplashFan empowerment through DAO and NFTsAccording to a press release on PR TIMES, the project, set to officially launch on June 19, 2025, aims to be accessible even to newcomers to NFTs or Web3. It will strive to ensure sustainability through transparent fund management and community-driven decision-making. The project introduces a new anime production model called "Anime DAO," starting with a near-future anime set in Neo Tokyo in 2050 that features characters and the world of the popular NFT collection "NEO TOKYO PUNKS." Funding will be raised through crowdfunding and the sale of celluloid art NFTs. Supporters will have the opportunity to vote on production decisions and own iconic scene NFTs once the anime is completed. The finished anime will premiere on MetaMe, followed by exclusive streaming on d-anime Store, while also integrating with the blockchain game GT6551, where fans can use anime characters and vehicles. This cross-media project combines anime, NFTs and e-sports, enhancing both fan engagement and user experience. Growing blockchain adoption in animeThis further demonstrates how the animation industry is embracing blockchain technology. In January, the Animecoin Foundation—whose early key contributors include Los Angeles-based NFT project Azuki—introduced the ANIME token on Ethereum and Arbitrum. Its tokenomics indicate a total supply of 10 billion tokens. The Foundation aims to connect the global anime fan base to blockchain, enabling creators to gain clearer insights into fan engagement and attribution, potentially unlocking new revenue models to support their intellectual property (IP). Although established in March 2024, the Animecoin Foundation traces its origins to Azuki’s mission of building an open anime universe. Azuki focuses on using blockchain technology and community involvement to develop decentralized anime IP and enrich the fan experience.  In a separate development, South Korea’s blockchain gaming platform WEMIX inked a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Japan’s Toei Animation late last year. Known for producing iconic titles such as Dragon Ball, One Piece and Slam Dunk, Toei Animation brings its storytelling and IP expertise, while WEMIX provides blockchain technology. The partnership aims to create an innovative blockchain-based gaming experience for a global audience.

news
Markets·

Mar 25, 2024

South Korean crypto-only exchanges on the brink of closure

Several South Korean crypto-only exchanges have long been struggling to keep their business afloat due to their prolonged weak performances. The local news outlet Etoday reported that the persistent underperformance of these local crypto exchanges is mounting pressure on their corporate operation and management, resulting in them shutting down their businesses. The situation hinders them from meeting the requirements set by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC).  Their inability to generate sufficient revenue, due to faltering token trading volumes, makes complying with the FIU guidelines a daunting task.Photo by Anne Nygård on UnsplashCascading closure of crypto exchanges According to crypto industry insiders, local crypto-only exchanges including Cashierest, Coinbit, Huobi Korea, Probit and Tennten have announced their service closure as early as the second half of last year. On Nov. 6, Cashierest announced it was shutting down its services, with Coinbit following suit in the same month. The cascading closure announcements from crypto exchanges raised concerns about their potential harm on investors.  In an effort to protect crypto investors, the FIU has released a statement that local crypto exchanges are obliged to meet the requirements of the FIU in compliance with the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, despite their closing of services. Furthermore, the regulator said finalizing business closure requires due assessment by the FIU.  "Virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must notify their users of the closure and explain how to reclaim their assets at least one month before the business closing date. They must also support users to withdraw their assets for at least three months before closing," the FIU stated.  Struggling to meet FIU requirements However, some point out that it would be challenging for near-bankrupt crypto exchanges to run a customer service center for more than three months. Some exchanges allow users to deposit and withdraw their assets until their closure, as they would under normal conditions, but charge additional fees afterward. "It is very demanding to operate customer services when we're seeing no actual gains," one exchange official said.  It has been found that some crypto exchanges failed to register a change in their business state with the FIU, which is mandatory in the event of business location or contact changes, under the Financial Transaction Reports Act.  When Etoday reporters visited the offices of some of these crypto exchanges, they were met with empty rooms. One person who is familiar with the matter said, "The exchange has moved its office to another location and is scheduled to resume service in March." 

news
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 19, 2023

Rising Cryptocurrency Arbitrage Transactions Raise Concerns in South Korea

Rising Cryptocurrency Arbitrage Transactions Raise Concerns in South KoreaThe number of arbitrage transactions between South Korean and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges has been experiencing a notable uptick, according to a report by local media outlet Maeil Business Newspaper.In recent developments, foreign actors engaging in price manipulation have been transferring substantial amounts of cryptocurrency assets to Korean exchanges, driving up prices. Subsequently, they transfer these tokens from Korean exchanges back to overseas platforms, capitalizing on the price discrepancies to generate profits.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashBithumb’s case in H1According to documents submitted to Kim Hee-gon, a member of the ruling political party People Power Party, on Monday, KRW 3.4 trillion ($2.6 billion) worth of tokens were moved from Bithumb, a leading Korean cryptocurrency exchange, to foreign trading platforms during the first half of this year. Although this figure marks a 40% decrease compared to H1 2022’s KRW 5.7 trillion, primarily due to the significant decline in token prices across the cryptocurrency market, it’s noteworthy that the number of transactions has seen a significant increase.Other exchangesGopax, another major exchange in the nation, recorded token outflows totaling KRW 12.3 billion. On the other hand, Upbit, Coinone, and Korbit, which are also prominent exchanges, declined to provide data due to reasons like confidentiality concerns. However, given that Upbit holds an 82.0% share of the Korean crypto market, nearly four times larger than Bithumb’s share (14.2%), it is suspected that the volume of tokens transferred from Upbit to foreign platforms would likely have followed a similar proportion.While the value of tokens sent from Bithumb to overseas operators saw a year-over-year decrease, the number of transactions surged to 231,302, nearly doubling the figure of H1 2022’s 124,048 transactions. The average transaction size was KRW 14.7 million.Even though the overall enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies might have cooled off since last year, the spike in the number of transactions suggests that there’s been a surge in arbitrage trading between Korea and foreign markets.Kimchi premiumEarlier this month, a significant transaction caught the eye of cryptocurrency market observers in South Korea. On September 1, crypto data analytics firm Arkham identified that 170,000 CyberConnect (CYBER) tokens were transferred to Bithumb from a crypto wallet thought to be owned by DWF Labs, a firm specializing in cryptocurrency trading and investment. The timing of the transaction coincides with a period during which the Kimchi premium for CYBER exceeded 100%. The Kimchi premium refers to the crypto price gap between Korean exchanges and their foreign counterparts.The complicating factor here is that DWF Labs is a foreign entity that is managed by a foreign team.The use of corporate accounts is virtually prohibited in the Korean crypto market. The Travel Rule mandates that any transfers of tokens between Korean and international exchanges must go through accounts that have been verified under Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines. Given these regulations, there are growing suspicions within the crypto community that foreign venture capitalists may have used accounts in borrowed names to conduct sales on Korean exchanges, which are restricted to Korean citizens. However, it’s worth noting that there is currently no legal basis for taking punitive action even if borrowed-name accounts were indeed used.Lawmaker Kim commented on the limitations of current financial regulations aimed at preventing money laundering in the cryptocurrency market. Despite efforts by financial authorities, including the introduction of the Travel Rule, Kim stated that these measures have not been very effective. He emphasized the urgency of enhancing the regulatory framework to curb potential illicit activities involving cryptocurrencies, such as those exploiting market arbitrage opportunities.

news
Loading