Shinhan Bank to Issue NFTs at 2023 Global Blockchain Incheon Conference

In response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs on foreign imports into the United States, Singapore-based and Nasdaq-listed Bitdeer has pivoted in an effort to handle this latest challenge. In a discussion with Bloomberg, Jeff LaBerge, the company’s head of capital markets and strategic initiatives, said that rather than concentrating on sales and exporting crypto mining rigs, the company plans to utilize those rigs itself within its own mining operations.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashLaBerge stated: “Our plan going forward is to prioritize our self-mining.” 90-day windowThe company is also planning to take advantage of a 90-day tariff suspension period that the Trump administration put in place earlier this month, to ship mining machines from Southeast Asia to the United States.  In tandem with this short-term push on U.S. exports, it is expected that miners will focus on buying hardware during this time. Jaran Mellerud, CEO of Hashlabs Mining, told Cointelegraph last week that in the short term, there is likely to be a spike in mining rig imports into the U.S. Some reports have suggested that U.S.-based mining firms have chartered flights in an effort to quickly import mining equipment and avoid tariffs of up to 104%. Additional capital overheads for U.S. minersOver the longer term, the crypto mining services company CEO believes that tariffs will hurt U.S.-based miners, increasing their capital costs to a greater extent than in the case of overseas-based mining operations. Earlier this month Kristian Csepcsar, chief marketing officer (CMO) at Bitcoin mining technology firm, Braiins, similarly claimed that Trump administration tariff policy would likely harm domestic mining companies, while benefiting those located in regions such as Russia and Kazakhstan.  In another effort to deal with the challenge of tariffs on its products entering the United States, Bitdeer anticipates that it will begin production of its mining equipment in the U.S. sometime during H2 2025. Much has changed for the Singapore-based firm over the course of a short period of time. A month ago LaBerge told CoinDesk about its efforts to challenge the leading ASIC Bitcoin mining equipment manufacturers, Bitmain and MicroBT. He said that Bitdeer wants to become “the top player in the market,” while believing that it has the technology and know-how to do so. Challenging market conditionsEven before this tariff war bubbled over recently, the environment for Bitcoin miners was already proving to be difficult. Miners had been selling off Bitcoin reserves in recent weeks, taking profits while anticipating lower Bitcoin prices in the near future. American multinational financial services firm JPMorgan estimated recently that the market cap of the 14 U.S.-listed Bitcoin miners had fallen by 25% in March, writing off $6 billion in value in what was the third worst month for miners on record. Last month Bernstein analysts cut their 2025 price targets for a range of publicly-listed Bitcoin miners. Miners have been adapting to their business environment by upgrading equipment, cutting costs and diversifying into AI data hosting.

Binance APAC Head Resigns Amid Regulatory ChallengesThe uncertainty swirling around Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, continues as Binance Head of Asia Pacific (APAC), Leon Foong, has resigned from his position.The resignation was reported by Bloomberg on Thursday, with the publication citing people familiar with the matter. Foong played a pivotal role in expanding Binance’s reach across markets like South Korea, Thailand, and Japan.Photo by Marten Bjork on UnsplashRecent pattern of executive exitsFoong’s departure is the latest one in a series of high-profile exits in recent months. Chief Strategy Officer Patrick Hillman and General Counsel Hon Ng are among those who have previously left, as regulatory authorities worldwide tighten their grip on Binance.Binance has been navigating a challenging period as regulatory crackdowns sweep across the global crypto space, prompting strategic shifts and senior leadership changes. Foong’s departure may also signify the company’s effort to realign itself in the face of mounting scrutiny.Market share under pressureThe regulatory backlash has not only led to senior leadership changes but has also impacted Binance’s market share. As authorities have clamped down on Binance due to alleged violations, the exchange’s dominance in the crypto trading market has diminished.Losses of key banking partnerships have compelled some customers to migrate to rival platforms. In some cases, Binance has simply been forced to retreat entirely from offering services in certain jurisdictions.Over the course of a period of three months earlier this year, the company lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Cyprus. French authorities are investigating the platform for alleged illegal provision of digital asset services and aggravated money laundering.In recent days, the global exchange platform has also come under pressure relative to the service it extends to Russian users. A Wall Street Journal exposé published last week alleged that Binance’s activities in Russia were in breach of sanctions imposed by the United States. Binance responded by removing the option for customers to transact over the platform using two sanctioned banks. It’s now understood that the company is considering going a step further and exiting that market entirely.LawsuitsBinance’s legal woes began with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filing a lawsuit against the exchange, along with its billionaire Founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ). The lawsuit alleged violations of derivatives regulations and criticized the firm’s compliance procedures. Binance reacted by expressing surprise and disappointment over the legal action.The challenges continued with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing a lawsuit against Binance and CZ in June, accusing the exchange of running unregistered exchanges and engaging in various other violations. Binance has consistently contested these allegations from both the CFTC and the SEC.In response to these challenges, CZ took to X (formerly Twitter) in July to reaffirm the exchange’s commitment to growth despite the setbacks.More concern has been created due to the recent filing by the SEC of a motion “under seal” in its case against Binance. That option is usually taken to prevent public knowledge of sensitive information, which possibly could relate to a parallel investigation from the US Justice Department.There’s likely to be no letup in the cloud that hangs over the business until all enforcement actions and lawsuits have run their course.

In the ongoing legal tussle over cryptocurrency assets, the High Court of Singapore has rejected a plea by the bankrupt crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Arthur Cheong, the founder of Web3 investment firm DeFiance Capital. This ruling represents a pivotal moment in the $140 million dispute, shedding light on the ownership and control of assets, while building upon DeFiance Capital’s previous success back in August of last year in having its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore endorsed.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashRecognizing assets held in trustOn Jan. 26, a Singapore judge ruled against 3AC's request to have Cheong’s claim thrown out, stating that DeFiance Capital has adequately demonstrated the existence of a Singapore-based trust safeguarding its assets. This revelation could potentially shield DeFiance Capital from 3AC's liquidators, marking a crucial juncture in the legal battle. The dispute traces back to an agreement where Cheong was set to launch an independent fund on the 3AC Group platform, with ownership and control vested in DeFiance Capital. This fund, leveraging 3AC's infrastructure, faced disagreements over the transfer of certain assets, whose undisclosed value became a point of contention in court documents. The downfall of the $10 billion 3AC hedge fund, responsible for the "Super Cycle" thesis predicting perpetual crypto price increases, had widespread repercussions in the crypto industry. DeFiance Capital bore the brunt of this collapse and the recent court ruling brings the firm closer to resolving the aftermath favorably. The ongoing argument holds strategic importance for DeFiance Capital, as the investment firm challenges any legal obligation for its shareholders to compensate 3AC creditors. "Wassielawyer," a pseudonymous restructuring attorney advising DeFiance Capital's founder Arthur Cheong, highlighted the significance of this stance on social media. Positive signThe judge's acknowledgment of the trust, while not conclusive, is viewed as a positive sign for DeFiance Capital. In a series of posts on the X social media platform, Wassielawyer outlined on Thursday that he sees this as "much-needed vindication" for Cheong, signaling a potential turn in favor of the investment firm. Wassielawyer emphasized that DeFiance Capital merely utilized 3AC's legal structure, without commingling operations. This distinction becomes crucial as carefully drafted legal documents form the basis for 3AC creditors attempting to seize DeFiance Capital funds. The restructuring professional added:”[DeFiance Capital] have on the basis of the substantive facts, ran an argument that the assets of DCs should not be used to pay back 3AC creditors. This eventuality would be manifestly unjust, enriching the creditors of 3AC at the expense of innocent DC investors.” Once a major player in the crypto hedge fund arena, 3AC's demise resulted from exposure to Terra, staked Ethereum and Grayscale's Bitcoin Trust. The bankruptcy filing on June 30, 2022, marked the end of an era for the once-mighty fund. Established in 2020, DeFiance Capital specializes in crypto investments, focusing on decentralized finance and GameFi. It has supported projects such as dYdX, Aave and Lido. This decision establishes a precedent for similar cases, particularly in jurisdictions like Singapore, emerging as pivotal hubs for cryptocurrency and blockchain-related activities. The outcome holds implications for how such legal disputes will be handled in the future, shaping the landscape of crypto-related legal proceedings.