Chinese Official Gets Life Sentence on Crypto Mining-Related Corruption Charges

Nassau and Treasure Labs Go Metaverse to Step into the Future of StyleKorean sports equipment manufacturer Nassau has entered into a partnership with metaverse company Treasure Labs to step into the future of style.According to a report by local news agency News1, this collaboration aims to introduce an innovative fashion brand on Pararium, the metaverse platform developed by Treasure Labs. Pararium users will have the opportunity to enjoy unique fashion items through their avatars while engaging in virtual experiences and earning rewards.Photo by Ben Hershey on UnsplashSports brandHaving built a reputable brand over the course of 50 years, Nassau is widely recognized in Korea for producing durable sports goods. By joining forces with Treasure Labs, Nassau aims to tap into the potential of Web3 content and services to enhance its global market presence.Metaverse platformTreasure Labs has been establishing a strong presence in the metaverse sector through collaborations with various entities such as blockchain platform Solana Labs, cryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com, and decentralized gaming platform The Sandbox. Notably, Treasure Labs is the first Korean company to secure investment from the Solana Foundation, the sister organization of Solana Labs.Both companies are enthusiastic about the prospects of this partnership. A representative from Treasure Labs emphasized that the collaboration will introduce a creative fashion brand that appeals to millennials and Generation Z, bridging the virtual and real worlds within the metaverse. The representative further mentioned plans to establish a dedicated brand hall within Pararium, where a series of events will showcase unique and trendy Web3 content. Echoing this sentiment, a Nassau official anticipates that the collaboration will give both firms a competitive edge in the global market.

South Korean lawmakers are moving to seize control of the nation’s stalled second phase of digital asset legislation, aiming to bypass months of interagency gridlock and introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework by January. The legislative acceleration comes as Seoul races to align with global standards following the implementation of the U.S. GENIUS Act in July, a shift that has intensified pressure on local regulators to formalize oversight of the crypto sector. According to a report from the Maeil Business Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act as a lawmaker-sponsored bill rather than wait for a government submission. The procedural move is intended to ensure that formal deliberations can begin during the February provisional session. Lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon, a DPK member of the National Policy Committee, told reporters on Dec. 11 that relying on the government’s timeline would jeopardize passage of the bill in the first half of next year. Kang cited points of disagreement among the parliament, the government, and industry stakeholders. Among the authorities, in particular, a standoff between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over monetary policy and issuance authority has been a key source of delay.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashDraft sets ‘major’ stablecoin requirementsAt the heart of the legislation is a new classification system for stablecoins. The government delivered its draft for the Digital Asset Basic Act to DPK’s Digital Asset Task Force, outlining its intention to classify won-denominated stablecoins exceeding a certain issuance threshold as “major digital payment tokens.” According to Blockmedia, citing sources familiar with the closed-door briefing to the task force, these assets would fall under a rigorous oversight framework developed in consultation with the central bank. Under the draft rules, issuers would be required to maintain 100% reserves, prohibited from making interest payments to holders, and obliged to submit detailed issuance plans to the FSC. Foreign-issued stablecoins would only be permitted to circulate domestically if the issuer establishes a local branch. Although the government ultimately submitted its draft to the DPK, the delivery was delayed by two days, missing the Dec. 10 deadline set by the party. Officials attributed the postponement to unresolved interagency disagreements. The central bank had argued that any issuance should require unanimous approval from all relevant agencies, including itself, but the government agreed to involve the bank only when a token is designated as “major.” The Bank of Korea continues to advocate for a bank-led consortium issuance model, highlighting the coordination challenges that have complicated the bill’s preparation. Supply thresholds emerge as fault lineCritics warn that the proposed regulations could inadvertently tilt the market against domestic innovation. Analysts argue that if the threshold for the "major" designation is set too low, new won-based issuers may face compliance costs that could undermine their business viability before they reach meaningful scale. They added that setting the bar for entrenched dollar-backed issuers such as USDT and USDC is also complex, given that their combined global issuance already exceeds $250 billion. Market participants said concerns about triggering the “major” designation could prompt Korean issuers to cap supply to avoid heightened scrutiny, effectively stifling growth from the outset. Despite these concerns, political will to close the policy vacuum is hardening. The DPK intends to move the legislation forward on its own timetable, incorporating the government’s input but steering the process through parliament. Lawmaker Kang emphasized that while numerous issues remain, the task force aims to narrow the debate to a few essential questions before the bill’s planned introduction in January. Industry representatives have largely welcomed the clearer timeline, viewing the move as a necessary step to reduce uncertainty as the global crypto sector comes under more formal regulatory oversight. 

Hodlnaut to proceed to liquidationCryptocurrency lender Hodlnaut, based in Singapore, is set to undergo liquidation, according to former interim judicial managers, Aaron Lee and Angela Ee.The High Court of Singapore has lifted the protection order it had put in place in respect of the business and efforts to restructure it in August 2022. The decision, formalized with a winding-up order filed on Friday in the High Court, follows a period of trading in 2022 when the company incurred losses of approximately $189 million due to the collapse of the Terra ecosystem in May 2022.The liquidators, tasked with providing regular updates to the more than 17,000 creditors, will oversee the process. Hodlnaut’s crypto assets, amounting to $13.3 million, were locked on FTX before the exchange froze withdrawals and declared bankruptcy last November. Despite a rejected restructuring plan earlier this year, the creditors opted for liquidation, deeming it more favorable to their interests. Aaron Lee and Angela Ee will now act as the appointed liquidators, overseeing the winding-up process under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act of 2018.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashCreditors favored liquidationAt an early stage, Hodlnaut founders Simon Lee and Zhu Juntao were in favor of a business sale as a preferable alternative to liquidation. Back in February, there appeared to be some potential of a sale, with several buyers having indicated an interest in the business. The identity of these interested parties was never revealed and the interim judicial managers of the restructuring process later confirmed that no “white knight” had emerged to buy out the business.It became clear in April of this year that creditors preferred liquidation as opposed to attempting to restructure the business. The Algorand Foundation is a leading creditor, with a $35 million exposure to Hodlnaut. In a court filing in April, the Algorand Foundation, alongside other leading creditors Samtrade Custodian Limited and S.A.M. Fintech Pte Ltd., were noted as being opposed to a restructuring.OPNX bidIn August it emerged that controversial crypto claims trading platform OPNX, owned by Three Arrows Capital’s (3AC) Kyle Davies and Su Zhu alongside Mark and Leslie Lamb from CoinFLEX, was mounting a bid for Hodlnaut.OPNX had proposed to provide a capital injection of $30 million. The proposal outlined that this investment would be made in the form of FLEX tokens, the native token of the CoinFLEX platform.Following consideration by the interim judicial managers overseeing Hodlnaut’s restructuring process, it decided not to take up the offer. It was decided that the FLEX tokens had a speculative value and that they were highly illiquid.Additionally, no clear timeline had been provided by OPNX in respect of the repayment of creditors’ debts. Furthermore, the proposal was found to be scant on detail, particularly with regard to payments which were limited to 30% of liabilities. In August the FLEX token experienced a large drop, falling 90% in value.