Crypto.com Complies with UK FCA’s New Digital Asset Rules

Korean Financial Watchdog Warns Investors Against Crypto ScamsThe South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) issued a press release today to warn investors against fraudulent cryptocurrency investment schemes.406 reported scams in two monthsBetween June 1 and July 30, the FSS received a total of 406 reports of crypto scams that lured individuals with false promises of high returns. Some of these perpetrators went to the extent of misrepresenting themselves as employees at crypto exchanges or project foundations. The FSS installed a virtual asset scam report center two months ago, which will run until this year’s end, as an interim measure before the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act in July of next year.Photo by Growtika on UnsplashSix scam typesTo strengthen its efforts, the FSS has shared six reported case types with the public and has issued investment warnings accordingly. Investors are advised to exercise caution when dealing with unlisted cryptocurrencies at low prices, as accurately determining their value can be challenging. Similarly, the FSS cautions against investing in cryptocurrencies sold at low prices with trading restrictions, as this could lead to difficulties in liquidating tokens if the price drops.The FSS also emphasizes the importance of being wary of cryptocurrencies with low trading volumes, as they can experience drastic price fluctuations due to limited activity. To prevent falling victim to impersonation scams, investors are urged to be cautious of individuals claiming to be employees of domestic virtual asset service providers or presenting official documents to solicit investments.Furthermore, the financial watchdog stresses the risks associated with suspicious requests associated with electronic wallets, particularly connecting to them via unsolicited emails, as they pose a high risk of being hacked.Lastly, the watchdog warns against falling for promises of high returns linked to cryptocurrencies endorsed by celebrities or well-known companies, as these may be illegal deposit-taking activities performed by unlicensed entities. The FSS advises investors to remain vigilant, conduct thorough research, and approach investment opportunities with skepticism to protect themselves from potential crypto scams.

Hong Kong Bank to Act as Settlement Bank for Crypto FirmsZA Bank, Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, is looking to become the go-to bank for crypto startups. The online bank has been given permission to serve as the settlement bank for regulated Web3 companies in the city. This development was announced at Hong Kong’s Web3 Festival, an event supported by the local government and attended by crypto startups and institutions from across Asia.©Pexels/Frank BarningHashKey and OSL collaborationZA Bank is expected to facilitate crypto-fiat conversions with two licensed exchanges in Hong Kong, HashKey and OSL, where customers can swap crypto into fiat currencies. ZA Bank will also offer basic banking services to local Web3 startups, a category that is currently underserved by traditional financial institutions.ZA Bank is focusing on assisting local Web3 startups and small-medium enterprises (SMEs).The bank linked up to the city’s company registry data, allowing for minimal information input and cross-checking. According to Devon Sin, alternate chief executive of ZA Bank, the bank currently conducts AML scrutiny against the usual checklists to satisfy the regulatory requirements. No AML issues have emerged during the recent months of work.Competing for global crypto businessHong Kong is trying to establish itself as a crypto-friendly alternative to other hubs, such as the US and Singapore, and a sandbox for Web3 businesses from China, where crypto trading is illegal. The city is revamping its digital assets regulatory framework, with plans to legalize retail trading of major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether. Ronald Lu, CEO of ZA Bank, said that ZA Bank’s online account opening for Web3 startups is a major step forward in integrating traditional banking services with the Web3 world.According to Lu, ZA Bank will act as a settlement bank for clients to allow withdrawals in Hong Kong, China, and US currencies after they deposit crypto tokens with exchanges. The business model is already operational through HashKey and OSL, the only two licensed crypto exchanges in Hong Kong. The bank will provide the same service for other exchanges as they become licensed.HK China’s crypto “trial run”Hong Kong is opening up to the beleaguered sector in a move that aims to revive its status as a financial center following years of COVID restrictions and political upheaval. However, access to banking has been a major hurdle for the city’s ambitions. The city’s banking and securities regulators are hosting a round-table for crypto players and bankers to share experiences and perspectives on banking services later this month.Many have speculated about a softening stance on cryptocurrency by the Chinese authorities. However, it’s more likely that they continue with strict regulation and control relative to crypto in mainland China while happy to monitor a more open approach to it within Hong Kong. Crypto analyst Myles Deutscher likens the approach to a “trial run” that is being monitored by China.Launched in March 2020, ZA Bank is one of Hong Kong’s eight licensed virtual banks and had the most net assets as of last year, despite remaining unprofitable. The virtual lender doesn’t expect it will need to boost its headcount to handle the crypto client push. Although the revenue model is still unclear, Lu said that more clients, more deposits, and more business opportunities are always great for the bank. The lender doesn’t offer services for clients from mainland China, given the restrictions in place there.

Japan’s Cryptoasset Group Proposes Self-Regulatory Reforms for IEO SystemThe Japan Cryptoasset Business Association (JCBA) has revealed a preliminary draft advocating for reforms in self-regulation to bolster the soundness of the initial exchange offering (IEO) system. This draft has been submitted to the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).IEOs serve as a mechanism enabling various enterprises to accrue funds and broaden their user base by orchestrating token sales on cryptocurrency exchanges for Web3 projects. This fundraising method holds the potential to enhance trust as crypto exchanges, supervised by the Japanese Financial Services Agency, undertake evaluations of project feasibility and maintain ongoing oversight.Photo by Takashi Miyazaki on UnsplashPositive regulatory developmentsThe ameliorating regulatory landscape is also a positive development, highlighted by this year’s tax law amendment, which grants exemptions to enterprises’ self-issued tokens from year-end corporate taxation. In Japan, four IEOs have been conducted so far, with the inaugural IEO amassing over 900 million yen (approximately $6 million). The cumulative amount from the four IEOs has surpassed 4.4 billion yen. However, given that the IEO is a relatively nascent fundraising method, improvements in token price stability and operational modalities are required to ensure that businesses and users can engage with it confidently.Enhanced user protectionAgainst this backdrop, JCBA, an organization comprised of various enterprises involving virtual assets and Web3, has been discussing the direction of the IEO system from a corporate viewpoint since May of this year. Establishing price stabilization measures and selling restrictions within the Japanese IEO system will contribute to user protection by allowing investors to manage their assets under domestic regulations. JCBA stated that users will find domestic exchanges more secure in comparison to foreign ones.As this proposal represents an initial draft, deliberated and formulated only within the JCBA, the group intends to consult and assess the feasibility of the self-regulatory rules with each pertinent organization as necessary.Four key pointsThe document submitted by JCBA to JVCEA presented four key points concerning the IEO. Pertaining to pricing, it suggested the diversification of calculation methods customized to each project and the specification of price-related disclaimers. On liquidity, it posited that liquidity objectives should be established at the time of listing, and an environment conducive to securing liquidity should be developed. JCBA also pointed out the necessity of establishing rules for price stabilization measures at the time of listing. Finally, regarding selling restrictions, it was noted that both token issuers and exchanges should adhere to a minimum three-month lock-up period for tokens.