Xangle and CertiK Team Up to Promote Mass Adoption of Web3

DWF Labs Enters Into Strategic Partnership with TRONDWF Labs, a Singapore-headquartered global digital asset market maker and Web3 investment firm, has announced a strategic partnership with TRON, the leading blockchain network focused on decentralizing the Internet through decentralized applications (dApps).Photo by Ketut Subiyanto on PexelsProviding liquidityThe partnership was announced via a press release published on Tuesday. As part of this collaboration, DWF Labs has become a liquidity provider for TRON, aiming to strengthen the ecosystem support of the blockchain.Andrei Grachev, the Managing Partner of DWF Labs, expressed confidence in the TRON ecosystem, highlighting its impressive adoption in the Web3 space. Grachev stated: “TRON stands as one of the fastest-growing dApps ecosystems in the space at the moment, and the consistent rollout of innovative tools and services proves that TRON has a leading role in paving the trail in blockchain.” He further emphasized DWF Labs’ commitment to supporting the ecosystem through additional investments in the near future.DWF Labs, known for its active support and investments in Web3 protocols, had previously allocated $15 million to the Web3 Industry Recovery Initiative, led by Binance Labs, to aid struggling protocols in the industry’s recovery. The company has also formed strategic partnerships with other prominent players in the crypto industry.Global market makerDWF Labs, as a global digital asset market maker and multi-stage Web3 investment firm, supports portfolio companies throughout various stages, from token listing to market making to OTC trading solutions. With offices in multiple locations worldwide, including Singapore, Switzerland, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Hong Kong, South Korea, and the British Virgin Islands (BVI), DWF operates as an affiliate of Digital Wave Finance (DWF), known for its proprietary technology in high-frequency trading and consistently ranking among the top 5 trading entities by volume in the cryptocurrency world.The firm has been on a spending spree in recent months. In April, it invested $10 million into Singapore-based payments provider Alchemy Pay. In the same month, it led a Series A funding round into Crypto GPT, an AI-powered blockchain platform. A $60 million investment in layer one blockchain EOS followed.A spokesperson for TRON expressed delight in partnering with DWF Labs, acknowledging their expertise and excellence in further strengthening the TRON ecosystem. Together, the aim is to advance TRON’s vision of a decentralized future, empowering decentralized commerce and community for every individual worldwide.By joining TRON as a liquidity provider, DWF Labs intends to contribute to the growth and development of the TRON ecosystem. This partnership aims to enhance the accessibility of the blockchain network for all TRON users and community members.TRON, founded in September 2017 by Justin Sun, has achieved significant milestones since the launch of its Mainnet in May 2018. Notably, the integration of BitTorrent, a decentralized Web3 services pioneer with over 100 million monthly active users, into the TRON ecosystem in July 2018. TRON has gained significant traction, with over 166.5 million total user accounts, more than 5.85 billion total transactions, and over $11.52 billion in total value locked (TVL) as of June 2023, according to TRONSCAN.

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.

The Philippines' financial regulator announced that it is implementing what amounts to a ban on Binance in the Southeast Asian nation by blocking local access to the leading global cryptocurrency exchange. This decision, publicized via a press release on March 25, comes as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) raised concerns last November over Binance's operations in the country, citing a lack of necessary licenses for certain investment products. According to the press release, the SEC revealed that it sought assistance from the National Telecommunication Commission (NTC) to enforce the ban, expressing worries about the security of Filipino investors' funds on the platform. In a letter addressed to the NTC, SEC Chairman Emilio Aquino stated:"The SEC has identified the aforementioned platform and concluded that the public's continued access to these websites/apps poses a threat to the security of the funds of investing Filipinos.”Photo by Krisia on PexelsA similar move was taken last December by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) in India, as it acted to block access to what it deemed to be non-compliant global crypto exchanges. Unlicensed servicesThe SEC alleges that Binance offers services like leveraged trading and crypto savings accounts without the required licenses, violating the country's Securities Regulation Code. Consequently, the ban is set to be implemented within three months, allowing investors time to exit their positions held through Binance. Furthermore, the SEC has requested Google and Meta to restrict Binance-related advertisements targeted at Filipino users on their platforms, extending the regulatory measures to online advertising as well. A similar stance was taken by authorities in Thailand last August with the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) engaging in talks with Facebook in an effort to curb questionable crypto-related advertising on the platform. Regulatory setbackThis move by the Philippines' financial watchdog marks another regulatory setback for Binance, which has faced increasing scrutiny globally. In December 2023, a U.S. court ordered Binance to pay significant fines to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for evading federal law and operating an illegal derivatives exchange. As part of the settlement, Binance's former CEO, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), agreed to step down from his position, with Zhao also facing civil and criminal charges related to anti-money laundering laws. The SEC's cautionary stance against Binance dates back to November 2023, shortly after Zhao's legal troubles in the U.S. emerged. At that time, the SEC expressed its intention to ban Binance in the Philippines, though the execution was postponed due to changes in the leadership of the regulatory body. Notably, Kenneth Stern, who headed up Binance's operations in the Philippines, exited the company in July 2023, amidst mounting regulatory pressures and legal challenges. Binance had seen many leading executives part ways with it in the lead-up to the company’s settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) last year. With regulatory actions tightening around Binance globally, the future of the exchange in various jurisdictions remains uncertain. The ban in the Philippines adds to the ongoing regulatory challenges faced by the company and underscores the growing importance of compliance within the cryptocurrency industry.