Huobi Rebrands as HTX to Mark Tenth Anniversary

DeFiance Capital Secures Interim Victory in Dispute With 3ACSingapore’s DeFiance Capital, a Web3 and crypto investment firm, has notched up a small triumph in its ongoing $140 million legal clash with failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashFavorable rulingAccording to a statement provided via a Medium blog post by DeFiance Capital Founder and CEO Arthur Cheong on Tuesday, the High Court of Singapore has delivered a favorable ruling for the firm, endorsing its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore, rather than the British Virgin Islands, which had been advocated by 3AC.The tussle between 3AC and DeFiance Capital centers around the ownership of certain assets. The liquidators appointed by the British Virgin Islands Court, from Teneo, assert that these assets essentially belong to 3AC’s creditors. However, DeFiance Capital argues vehemently that these assets must be partitioned and returned to its stakeholders.Struggle over assets and jurisdictionAt the heart of the matter are assets totaling $115 million, encompassing digital currencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which currently remain under the control of DeFiance Capital. Additionally, there are 69 SAFE (simple agreement for future equity)/SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens) agreements linked to 3AC. Although Teneo places the collective worth of these assets at roughly $141 million, DeFiance Capital’s estimation is more conservative, pegging it at around $120 million.Beyond asset ownership, jurisdiction has become a pivotal point of contention in the legal discourse. DeFiance Capital has steadfastly advocated for legal proceedings to take place in Singapore, where it operates, as opposed to the British Virgin Islands. The recent ruling from the High Court of Singapore lends support to this stance, challenging Teneo’s argument.DeFiance articulated its position, asserting: “Our position was that all the important witnesses and documents are in Singapore and the dispute ought to be heard by the Singapore Courts to ensure all relevant evidence would be available.”With the court’s decision aligning with DeFiance’s jurisdictional preference, the firm hopes that this development will pave the way for more substantive engagement between the parties, rather than being embroiled in procedural wrangling. The firm believes that this will allow the focus to shift towards addressing the core issues at hand.Business riftThe genesis of this legal saga dates back to 2020 when DeFiance was established as part of the 3AC group, operating autonomously under the stewardship of its founder, Arthur Cheong. The rift escalated in February 2022, when Cheong declined 3AC’s proposal to relocate to Dubai, eventually leading to the formation of two Singapore-based firms in May of that year.Furthermore, in the same month, DeFiance extended a loan of $35 million worth of USDC to 3AC, effectively becoming a creditor. Complications arose when 3AC’s founders transferred legal rights related to DeFiance Capital, a transaction that remained incomplete as 3AC filed for bankruptcy.In light of the ongoing dispute, 3AC asserted that DeFiance’s assets should be harnessed to settle its debts. However, DeFiance firmly stood its ground, upholding its ownership claims over the assets.With liquidators advocating for resolution in the British Virgin Islands — a move that DeFiance rejected due to its Singaporean management ties with 3AC — the stage was set for the legal clash that has now taken a notable turn with this recent court ruling.

Lack of Funds Sees Multichain Cease OperationsThe development team behind Multichain, a cross-chain protocol, has recently announced its decision to cease operations due to a lack of operational funds.This announcement follows a report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, which suggested that insiders may have orchestrated a “rug pull” by withdrawing funds. The Multichain team took to Twitter on Friday to inform their community about the suspension of their business activities, citing a lack of alternative sources of information and operational funds as the primary reasons for their decision.One crucial factor contributing to the shutdown is the absence of communication with the CEO, Zhaojun, who had been missing and is now understood to be in the custody of Chinese authorities. The team explained that they had reached out to Zhaojun’s family and discovered that the police had seized his computers, phones, wallets, and mnemonic phrases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashOperational controlThroughout the project’s lifespan, Zhaojun had maintained control over operational and investor funds. Consequently, the team, along with all their funds and access to servers, found themselves at Zhaojun’s mercy, as he now remains under police custody.Attempting to salvage the situation, Zhaojun’s sister initiated an asset preservation act and transferred some funds to addresses under her control. However, the team soon received news that Zhaojun’s sister, too, had been detained by the police and was now unreachable. Faced with these unfortunate circumstances, the team reluctantly announced the cessation of their operations.DeFi centralization risksThe debacle has raised concerns about the lack of decentralization demonstrated by the level of control Zhaojun had over the project. It prompted comment from Chris Blec, a DeFi Researcher & Analyst who has been highly critical of a whole host of DeFi projects on the basis that while many DeFi projects claim to be decentralized, they’re critically flawed and are centralized to a point that puts them at critical risk.Taking to Twitter, Blec stated: “Dude gets thrown in jail, admin keys to Multichain are on his computers, sister eventually uses his computer to steal money, now she’s in jail too. THIS IS WHY WE DECENTRALIZE.”The Multichain debacle traces back to May when the suspension of Multichain routes for an upgrade caused delays in fund transfers. The uncertainties surrounding the protocol prompted crypto exchange Binance to halt deposit and withdrawal support for certain Multichain bridged tokens.Adding to the platform’s woes, significant outflows from the Multichain MPC bridge platform raised concerns of an exploit. Observers analyzing the blockchain data reached a consensus on July 6 that the protocol had been hacked, as over $100 million worth of assets were withdrawn from the Fantom bridge on the Ethereum side.As Multichain now faces the unfortunate reality of halting its operations, it serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and risks inherent in the blockchain industry. The lack of operational funds, combined with the absence of communication with key figures and critical points of centralized failure have proven insurmountable for this cross-chain protocol.

RaonSecure to Develop Digital Identity Strategy for the Indonesian GovernmentRaonSecure, a South Korea-based decentralized identity (DID) service provider utilizing blockchain technology, has secured a contract with the Korea-Indonesia e-Government Cooperation Center. The contract involves providing consultation services aimed at devising a strategy for the implementation of a digital identity system in Indonesia. The selection of RaonSecure as the contract winner was orchestrated by Korea’s National Information Society Agency (NIA), and this strategic venture is being executed through the bilateral center.Photo by Ben Sweet on UnsplashBilateral center fostering tech exchangeEstablished in Jakarta in 2016, the bilateral center aims to facilitate the exchange of technological expertise between the Korean government and its Indonesian counterpart. This organization also serves to accelerate the entry of Korean enterprises into the Southeast Asian market.Indonesia’s national service portalAs the Indonesian government looks forward to establishing a national service portal, the need for a robust national digital identity system has been growing. This system is envisaged to support functionalities such as user authentication, e-signatures, and privacy protection.Blockchain-based DID implementationIn light of these needs, RaonSecure has emerged as a suitable company for the project, showcasing its technological prowess and stability. The Korean tech firm’s expertise has been evident in the successful deployment of its blockchain-powered DID platform, OmniOne, across diverse organizational settings. Noteworthy deployments include providing OmniOne for the issuance of identification cards to government employees, licensed drivers, and military veterans. Furthermore, RaonSecure has recently partnered with the Korea Federation of Savings Banks (KFSB) to develop a solution that verifies bank customers’ identities using mobile ID cards.The Indonesian venture is encouraging development for RaonSecure as it will serve as a gateway to not only fostering its presence within Southeast Asia but also propelling its reach far beyond, and the company’s blockchain DID technology will play a key role in spearheading this expansion into new horizons.