Raon Whitehat Launches Cloud-Based NFT Wallet for OmniOne Marketplace

Hong Kong securities group proposes ICOs as growth opportunityKey stakeholders in Hong Kong’s financial world are contemplating a transformative shift in the Chinese autonomous territory’s digital asset strategy that concerns furthering initial coin offerings (ICOs).Photo by Qinyi Lian on UnsplashRoom for improvementIn a recent letter signed by Chen Zhihua, President of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association (HKSFPA) and published to the HKSFPA website on Wednesday, the introduction of an ICO mechanism as a potential catalyst for the city’s economic revival has been proposed.The letter, which provided the HKSFPA’s “opinions on the 2024–2025 budget,” included the ICO suggestion as recommendation №10 on a list of various proposals. The suggestion comes amid ongoing efforts to navigate the economic challenges posed by the pandemic. Zhihua acknowledges the developmental approach taken by Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee where financial sector strategy is concerned, but emphasizes the industry group’s belief in the room for improvement that exists to stimulate Hong Kong’s financial sector further.Formalizing ICOsFormalizing ICOs in Hong Kong could establish a supportive environment for crypto startups and investors seeking regulated and secure opportunities. The proposal aligns with a broader call for government engagement in economic recovery and policy-making, emphasizing a collaborative approach toward the crypto sector. This inclusive stance signals a forward-thinking perspective that could lead to more supportive policies and frameworks, fostering a conducive environment for crypto innovation and growth.Reflecting on the history of ICOs, the letter acknowledges the fundraising method’s evolution since the attention garnered by the Mastercoin ICO in 2013 and Ethereum’s significant milestone in 2014. The ICO boom of 2017 saw projects like EOS and Tezos raising substantial funds, accompanied by both enthusiasm for fundraising ease and concerns about investor protection due to minimal regulation.Fraud concernsWhile the ICO boom faced regulatory scrutiny and witnessed instances of fraud and scams, a progressive approach by financial regions such as Hong Kong could reshape the global perception of ICOs. The letter suggests that, under favorable terms, ICOs could play a pivotal role in revitalizing the digital asset landscape.Zhihua underscores the importance of addressing potential challenges by urgently reviewing and enhancing anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing legislation. This cautious approach aims to ensure that ICOs in Hong Kong adhere to established frameworks, avoiding the pitfalls associated with unregulated fundraising.While that’s the HKSFPA’s position, the initial flurry of ICOs a number of years ago involved many projects proposed by scammers and fraudsters. At the time, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) recognized the development as “downright fraud” and put pressure on exchanges to delist many tokens.One other related element that the letter proposes is in integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) and Islamic finance elements into investment immigration policies. This forward-thinking approach reflects a growing awareness of ethical and sustainable investment practices that could potentially position Hong Kong to set new standards for responsible investment.

Beosin Report: Crypto Rug Pulls Surpass DeFi Exploits in MayAccording to a recent report by blockchain security firm Beosin, losses from “rug pulls” or “exit scams” in the cryptocurrency space exceeded the amount stolen from decentralized finance (DeFi) projects during the month of May.The report, published on June 1 by Beosin Blockchain Security, revealed that rug pulls and scams resulted in losses of over $45 million across six incidents during the month. Beosin is headquartered in Chengdu, in China’s Sichuan province. The firm uses formal verification methods to secure smart contracts.In general there were 22 security incidents in the digital assets space over the course of the month. That overall figure accounts for losses totaling $20 million, and represents a vast improvement on the previous month.Three of the incidents were accounted for by security issues related to hardware wallets such as the Trezor and imKey wallets. Six were rug pulls/crypto scams, two were crypto crime incidents while another implicated a critical vulnerability relative to zero-knowledge proof technology.Photo by Tara Winstead on PexelsDeFi protocol attacksIn contrast, there were 10 attacks on DeFi protocols, amounting to $19.7 million in stolen funds. This figure represents a significant decrease of nearly 80% compared to April, and the losses from these types of exploits had been declining for two consecutive months, as per Beosin’s findings.The largest rug pull incident in May involved the alleged disappearance of $32 million associated with the crypto project Fintoch on May 24. Meanwhile, the largest attack on a DeFi platform was a $7.5 million breach targeting Jimbos protocol, according to Beosin’s report.Shifting hacker strategyBeosin noted a shift in the targeting strategy of hackers and scammers, who are now increasingly focusing their attacks on ordinary users rather than various project parties. To mitigate risks, the report recommended that crypto users enhance their anti-fraud awareness, conduct thorough due diligence before investing in projects, and learn how to improve the security of their digital assets.The report also issued a warning against using shared or public charging devices for mobile phones. Beosin highlighted the potential risks associated with these devices, as they could be manipulated to inject malicious programs that compromise private keys. This caution aligns with a similar advisory issued by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in April.The FBI’s Denver office cautioned against using public USB ports, including those found at airports, due to the potential introduction of malware and monitoring software onto devices. Instead, they suggested carrying a personal charger and USB cord for use with electrical outlets.As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for users to remain vigilant and proactive in safeguarding their investments. With the rise of rug pulls and the ongoing threats in the DeFi space, staying informed, exercising caution, and adopting robust security measures are essential for protecting one’s digital assets in this rapidly changing industry.

Bithumb and Korbit Struggle to Gain Traction Despite Zero Trading FeesSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently eliminated trading fees, but their bold decision hasn’t yielded much results. Bithumb was the first to implement this change and attracted users for about a week, but it is now seeing a loss in market share. Korbit, following Bithumb’s example, is also struggling to achieve meaningful outcomes.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashLimited impactLocal media outlet Chosun Biz used data from crypto data platform CoinGecko to draw this conclusion. On October 26, Korbit’s daily trading volume represented 0.19% of the total trading volume among South Korea’s top five crypto exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax). This figure marked a 0.14 percentage point increase compared to the 0.05% recorded on October 19. Korbit had implemented a zero trading fee policy at 9 a.m. (KST) on October 20. Additionally, they launched a promotion offering KRW 5,000 ($3.69) worth of bitcoin to users who transferred virtual assets totaling KRW 1 million or more from Travel Rule-compliant exchanges to Korbit. While the promotion did contribute to Korbit’s market share, it still remains below 1%.Bithumb’s performance showed some improvement, albeit briefly. As of October 26, Bithumb’s market share stood at 18%, marking a 4.7 percentage point increase from its 13.3% share on October 3, the day before it eliminated trading fees. However, it’s worth noting that its market share had reached almost 30% shortly after the promotion’s launch. This indicates that its strategy is losing efficacy over time.The less-than-enthusiastic results from their daring marketing endeavors can be attributed to their inability to draw in retail investors. To begin with, Upbit, the leading player in the market, had already been providing a relatively low fee of 0.05%. Furthermore, adapting to new user interfaces on these exchanges posed a challenge. Zero trading fees weren’t attractive enough for crypto investors to leave their current platforms.Trading volume mattersIn the case of Korbit, its lower trading volume was a disadvantage when it came to attracting users. On crypto exchanges, a higher trading volume typically translates to faster trade executions. As a result, users of Korbit might experience delays in executing trades at their preferred price.Jeong Hye-won, a research associate at crypto data analytics platform Xangle, told Chosun Biz that users on exchanges with lower trading volumes tend to experience slippages due to slower transaction speeds and sparsely populated order books. A slippage means the difference between the initially placed order price and the executed order price. Jeong further explained that Korbit’s zero trading fee policy didn’t have a significant impact because it offers fewer listed tokens compared to Upbit and Bithumb.There is speculation that the free-trading fee promotions introduced by Bithumb and Korbit, despite their revenue sacrifices, might conclude sooner than initially anticipated due to their perceived ineffectiveness. Bithumb derives 99.95% of its revenue from trading fees, while Korbit relies on trading fees for 99.79% of its income. An industry insider has commented that trading fees play a vital role in an exchange’s revenue, and given Bithumb’s reported loss in earnings during the second quarter, there are concerns about their capacity to sustain this strategy.