Former SoftBank Executive Launches Stablecoin in Abu Dhabi

Tether Critics Point to Previous Chinese Securities BackingUSDT stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT) has long faced persistent scrutiny and criticism due to the lack of transparency surrounding the assets backing their digital currencies. The latest allegations come in the form of a report by Bloomberg on Friday suggesting that the world’s largest stablecoin was once backed by securities issued by Chinese companies.Photo by Manuel Joseph on PexelsNYAG releases documentsThese findings were based on documents made public by the New York Attorney General (NY AG). The documents disclosed that Tether had listed securities issued by China’s state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China as part of its reserves backing the USDT stablecoin.Rumors about USDT’s exposure to Chinese securities have circulated for a number of years. In 2021, a Bloomberg research report revealed that Tether’s reserves reportedly included billions of dollars in short-term loans to China-based companies, as well as a significant loan to the collapsed crypto lender Celsius Network.However, in February 2021, Tether reached a settlement with the NY AG’s office over accusations of providing misleading information about its reserves and losses. To address these concerns, Tether handed over documents such as letters, bank accounts, reserve holdings, and wallet addresses through the law firm Steptoe.Attestation reportTether’s latest attestation report for Q1 2023, released on May 10, offered further details about its reserves. According to the report, Tether’s reserves were valued at $81.8 billion at the end of the quarter, a significant increase from the earlier period of $14.8 billion. These reserves consisted of $53 billion in US Treasuries, $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, and $5.3 billion in loans described as “over-collateralized.”The disclosure of Tether’s previous backing by Chinese securities adds another layer of complexity to the stablecoin landscape, raising questions about the risk exposure and potential impact on the stability of these digital assets. Using Chinese commercial paper to back a US dollar stablecoin is a risky endeavor.It raises the same issues as we’ve seen with the plethora of crypto lenders that went bankrupt in 2022. In those cases, they were using customer money to speculate and turn a profit. That’s fine when it works but when it goes wrong, it is customers who suffer. In its defense, Tether has stated that it only held A1 rated banking sector Chinese commercial paper in 2022 in state-owned Chinese companies like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp., and Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. It reduced this exposure to zero later that year.With the cryptocurrency community and regulators seeking greater transparency and accountability, the industry is likely to face increased scrutiny and calls for enhanced regulations to ensure the integrity of stablecoin operations moving forward.As regulators continue to assess and navigate the evolving crypto market, it remains to be seen how the industry will address these concerns and establish clearer guidelines for stablecoin issuers to ensure the trust and confidence of market participants.

Matrixport’s Market Sentiment Index Points Towards Bullish MomentumMatrixport, the Singapore-headquartered digital asset financial services provider, has once again showcased its Bitcoin Greed & Fear Index in forecasting unit price trends relative to Bitcoin. The company has repeatedly pointed to trends indicated by the proprietary index, with its current signals on this occasion pointing towards a potential resurgence of bullish sentiment for Bitcoin (BTC).Potential price resurgenceRecent data from Matrixport’s index demonstrates a notable shift from 30% to 60%, a significant rebound following July’s sharp decline from above 90%. This rebound has caught the attention of Markus Thielen, who serves as the Head of Research and Strategy at Matrixport. Thielen conveyed his thoughts on the current indications provided by the Index in a recent note to clients.Thielen noted that the index appears to have reached its bottom, as the daily signal indicates an impending upward push. This tactical bullishness, following a four-week period of consolidation, raises the possibility of Bitcoin prices resuming their upward trajectory.Historical data comparisonDrawing upon historical patterns, the index’s peaks and troughs, along with its 21-day simple moving average (SMA), have consistently aligned with shifts between bullish and bearish trends in Bitcoin’s value. Currently, the 21-day SMA shows signs of bottoming out, which further bolsters the argument for an upcoming resurgence of positive volatility in the Bitcoin market.Gauging sentimentAt its core, the Greed & Fear Index serves as a gauge for investor sentiment within the cryptocurrency realm. When readings exceed 90%, they signify a state of greed or unwarranted optimism, whereas readings below 10% denote extreme fear or pessimism. These metrics hold a certain significance as they often coincide with market peaks marked by excessive optimism and bottoms marked by intense fear.For the past several weeks, Bitcoin’s price movement has been subdued, oscillating within the range of $28,000 to $30,000. This stagnation has coincided with broader market volatility and anticipations of forthcoming interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve in the early months of the upcoming year.Analysts are pinpointing consideration by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding the approval of a spot exchange-traded fund (ETF) as a pivotal catalyst for future price fluctuations given the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock, has gotten involved. In a recent interview with Forbes, contributor Sam Lyman stated: “A lot of bitcoin ETFs have been filed in the last couple years — but none from an asset manager as high-profile and well connected as BlackRock.”Not an exact scienceMatrixport’s Bitcoin Greed & Fear Index stands as one individual tool which can be utilized in order to arrive at a forecast relative to Bitcoin pricing. Price forecasting is far from an exact science and while it is encouraging that the Index is pointing towards a potential bullish resurgence in Bitcoin’s price movement, market participants will need to remain mindful that markets by their very nature are unpredictable, particularly so when it comes to a nascent asset such as Bitcoin.As the market watches the SEC’s deliberations relative to a Bitcoin ETF closely, the time ahead is likely to hold significant developments that could shape the future trajectory of Bitcoin’s value.

Binance APAC Head Resigns Amid Regulatory ChallengesThe uncertainty swirling around Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, continues as Binance Head of Asia Pacific (APAC), Leon Foong, has resigned from his position.The resignation was reported by Bloomberg on Thursday, with the publication citing people familiar with the matter. Foong played a pivotal role in expanding Binance’s reach across markets like South Korea, Thailand, and Japan.Photo by Marten Bjork on UnsplashRecent pattern of executive exitsFoong’s departure is the latest one in a series of high-profile exits in recent months. Chief Strategy Officer Patrick Hillman and General Counsel Hon Ng are among those who have previously left, as regulatory authorities worldwide tighten their grip on Binance.Binance has been navigating a challenging period as regulatory crackdowns sweep across the global crypto space, prompting strategic shifts and senior leadership changes. Foong’s departure may also signify the company’s effort to realign itself in the face of mounting scrutiny.Market share under pressureThe regulatory backlash has not only led to senior leadership changes but has also impacted Binance’s market share. As authorities have clamped down on Binance due to alleged violations, the exchange’s dominance in the crypto trading market has diminished.Losses of key banking partnerships have compelled some customers to migrate to rival platforms. In some cases, Binance has simply been forced to retreat entirely from offering services in certain jurisdictions.Over the course of a period of three months earlier this year, the company lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Cyprus. French authorities are investigating the platform for alleged illegal provision of digital asset services and aggravated money laundering.In recent days, the global exchange platform has also come under pressure relative to the service it extends to Russian users. A Wall Street Journal exposé published last week alleged that Binance’s activities in Russia were in breach of sanctions imposed by the United States. Binance responded by removing the option for customers to transact over the platform using two sanctioned banks. It’s now understood that the company is considering going a step further and exiting that market entirely.LawsuitsBinance’s legal woes began with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filing a lawsuit against the exchange, along with its billionaire Founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ). The lawsuit alleged violations of derivatives regulations and criticized the firm’s compliance procedures. Binance reacted by expressing surprise and disappointment over the legal action.The challenges continued with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing a lawsuit against Binance and CZ in June, accusing the exchange of running unregistered exchanges and engaging in various other violations. Binance has consistently contested these allegations from both the CFTC and the SEC.In response to these challenges, CZ took to X (formerly Twitter) in July to reaffirm the exchange’s commitment to growth despite the setbacks.More concern has been created due to the recent filing by the SEC of a motion “under seal” in its case against Binance. That option is usually taken to prevent public knowledge of sensitive information, which possibly could relate to a parallel investigation from the US Justice Department.There’s likely to be no letup in the cloud that hangs over the business until all enforcement actions and lawsuits have run their course.