Top

Korean Securities Firms Unite to Build Shared Security Token Infrastructure

Web3 & Enterprise·September 13, 2023, 5:44 AM

Shinhan Securities, KB Securities, and NH Investment and Securities are gearing up to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) later this month to establish a security token consortium, according to South Korean news outlet MoneyToday.

Photo by Louie Nicolo Nimor on Unsplash

 

Shared infrastructure

The primary objective of this consortium is to create a shared infrastructure for their security token operations. This initiative marks the first instance where the nation’s major securities firms are getting together to set up a security token consortium. Until now, securities companies have typically sought collaborations with banks, fractional investment firms, or blockchain technology companies, showing reluctance to cooperate with their direct competitors over concerns of potential loss of competitiveness.

An expert within the securities industry underscored the paramount importance of securing control over the infrastructure, particularly given that the security token market has not materialized. The expert further stated that once a collaborative network is built among the leading securities firms, it is likely to set the standards for the entire market. Meanwhile, the precise details of the plan have not yet been finalized.

 

Challenges in prior initiatives

Since the South Korean Financial Services Commission revealed the security token guidelines in February, the securities sector has been deliberating the creation of a shared network that would be accessible to all industry participants. This kind of system is considered ideal as it facilitates flexible expansion and cost efficiency. However, the discussion came to a halt due to conflicts between the Korea Securities Depository, the Korea Financial Investment Association, and fintech firm Koscom.

Meanwhile, installing an independent network is not very feasible, given that it not only incurs significant costs upfront but also has limited potential for expansion. This is why these industry leaders devised an alternative strategy in which they can collectively share the financial burden. In addition, Shinhan, KB, and NH plan to explore joint business models with the aim of maximizing the utility of their security token infrastructure.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 09, 2023

Binance withdraws Abu Dhabi bid amid global licensing reevaluation

Binance withdraws Abu Dhabi bid amid global licensing reevaluationLeading global crypto exchange Binance has chosen to withdraw its bid for a trading license in Abu Dhabi, according to information gleaned from the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) register and a report published by Reuters on Thursday.Photo by Demid Druz on UnsplashChange of directionThe local subsidiary company responsible for the application, BV Investment Management Limited, initially submitted its licensing bid on Nov. 15, 2022. Much has changed in the crypto space and in the fortunes of Binance over the course of the past year, leading the firm to withdraw its application on Nov. 7.This proposed license would have granted Binance the authority to pool and invest funds from professional investors. The decision to retract the bid is part of Binance’s broader reevaluation of its overall strategy going forward. “When assessing our global licensing needs, we decided this application was not necessary,” a spokesperson from the company told Reuters.Adapting to new circumstancesMuch has changed for Binance in 2023. The company has been combating regulatory pushback in multiple jurisdictions worldwide, not least in the United States, where Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) recently reached a plea agreement with U.S. prosecutors and agreed to pay $4.3 billion for violations related to money laundering and sanctions laws.As part of that process, CZ stepped down as CEO, passing the leadership to Singaporean Richard Teng. Teng is a former regulatory executive who previously oversaw the exchange’s regional operations. A spokesperson for the company maintained that this recent decision relative to licensing in Abu Dhabi is entirely unrelated to the recently agreed-upon settlement in the United States.UAE tiesWhile Binance may be dropping its attempts to gain licensing in Abu Dhabi, in July the company acquired a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority in the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) other major center, Dubai. The UAE is also the location where CZ has established his home.Some had speculated that the company had also established its headquarters within the UAE. However, CZ has always refused to disclose the firm’s global headquarters, instead suggesting that the firm has no global headquarters. Teng has taken a similar approach.Binance was originally founded in China in 2017. It then shifted its headquarters to Japan and later established a base in Malta to circumvent regulatory challenges in China. Similarly, it’s thought that regulatory scrutiny provides the rationale for the company’s ongoing stance in refusing to confirm the location of its corporate headquarters.Despite regulatory challenges, Binance had previously expressed a focus on expanding its operations in the Middle East, known for its crypto-friendly environment and specific regulatory frameworks. Binance holds various crypto licenses from regulators in the region. In May of last year, it acquired a Category 4 crypto-asset service provider (CASP) license from the Central Bank of Bahrain.The exchange maintains registrations and licenses across Europe, Asia and other regions. It’s had mixed fortunes in its endeavors over recent months, driven out of some markets while making in-roads in others. Earlier this week, its Binance Japan subsidiary became fully operational. Last week, regulators in the Philippines moved against the company due to regulatory irregularities.

news
Markets·

Jun 30, 2023

Survey Reveals 45.9% of Korean Crypto Investors Reporting Losses

Survey Reveals 45.9% of Korean Crypto Investors Reporting LossesAccording to a recent survey, more than half of South Korean adults have experience of owning cryptocurrency. Most of them bought crypto for investment purposes, with 33% of respondents making gains and 45.9% losing money.Photo by RDNE Stock project on Pexels2,500 respondentsThe Korea Financial Consumers Protection Foundation, a public research and education institute, conducted an online survey to assess the prevalence and trends of cryptocurrency ownership among South Koreans. The study, conducted between March 3 and March 24, 2023, encompassed 2,500 participants between the ages of 20 and 69 residing in Seoul, its suburbs, and the six major metropolitan areas. The results shed light on the crypto landscape, including ownership patterns, investment purposes, asset holdings, funding sources, and the future intentions of respondents.Crypto ownership trendsAccording to the survey, 30% of the participants currently own cryptocurrency, while 23% revealed they had previously owned crypto assets but no longer possess them, indicating that more than half of the respondents have had exposure to cryptocurrencies at some point in their lives.Among current crypto holders, 74.5% stated that they had acquired their first digital assets between 2020 and 2022, which suggests a surge in crypto purchases during the COVID pandemic period.Purpose of holding cryptoRegarding the purpose of holding crypto, 80.9% of respondents who either currently own or have previous experience owning cryptocurrency (representing approximately 43% of all participants) cited investment as their primary motivation. Furthermore, 17.4% viewed crypto as a trading instrument, while 17.8% held it for specific service utilization. (Individuals were allowed to choose multiple options.) From this result, the authors estimated that around 24.2% of all respondents currently hold crypto for investment purposes.The survey revealed the distribution of virtual asset holdings among respondents, with the values quoted in Korean Won (KRW). Among the participants, 21.5% owned less than 1 million KRW ($760), while 45.8% held more than 1 million KRW ($760) but less than 10 million KRW ($7,600). Additionally, 28.8% possessed between 10 million KRW ($7,600) and 100 million KRW ($76,000), and 3.9% held more than 100 million KRW ($76,000) in crypto assets.Funding sourcesWhen asked about the sources of funds used to purchase virtual assets, 82.5% of individuals with previous crypto ownership experiences mentioned utilizing spare funds from deposits or other sources. Meanwhile, 17.7% disclosed that they had liquidated other assets, such as stocks or real estate, to invest in cryptocurrencies. (Individuals were allowed to choose multiple options.) In addition, 7.8% of respondents acknowledged borrowing from acquaintances, with a higher rate of 11.8% among those in their 20s. The proportion of respondents who borrowed from loans was 6.2%.Among those who borrowed funds to invest in crypto, 47.6% are currently facing difficulties in repaying their loans, while 28.6% experienced repayment challenges in the past. This data suggests that a significant portion of individuals who borrowed to purchase cryptocurrencies encounter difficulties in loan repayment.Regarding the financial institutions from which respondents borrowed, 57.1% borrowed from the banking sector, while the remaining 42.9% obtained funds from non-banking entities. Encouragingly, no respondents reported borrowing from loan sharks.Cumulative returnsRegarding the cumulative returns on crypto assets, 33% of respondents who currently hold crypto reported gains, with an average cumulative return of 25%. Conversely, 45.9% reported losses, experiencing an average cumulative loss of 41.5%.When liquidating their crypto assets, 24.7% of traders made a profit, while 47.9% incurred losses. The data reveals that the proportion of individuals who suffered losses in their crypto investments was nearly twice as high as those who reported gains. Furthermore, higher age groups exhibited a higher percentage of losses compared to younger respondents. Among those who profited, the average return was 38.4%, while those who suffered losses reported an average loss of 37.5%.Future intentionsThe survey also inquired about the future intentions of respondents regarding their crypto holdings. Among current crypto holders, 80.8% expressed their intention to continue holding crypto assets. On the other hand, among those who do not currently own any crypto assets, 72.8% stated that they do not plan to purchase cryptocurrencies in the future.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 03, 2023

Binance Thriving in China Despite Crypto Ban

Binance Thriving in China Despite Crypto BanWhen China cracked down on cryptocurrency trading in 2021, it seemed like Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, would have to leave the country behind. However, nearly two years later, an investigative report carried out by the Wall Street Journal finds that business is thriving for Binance in China.Photo by Hanson Lu on Unsplash$90 billion in monthly tradingThe report, which was published on Wednesday, reveals that users managed to trade a staggering $90 billion worth of cryptocurrency-related assets in China within just one month.Internal data, shared with The Wall Street Journal and corroborated by current and former employees, unveils this underground activity. Remarkably, these transactions propelled China to become Binance’s largest market, accounting for a massive 20% of global trading volume, excluding trades by a subset of major traders.Almost one million active Chinese usersDespite the supposed ban, Binance’s internal discussions highlight the pivotal role China still plays for the exchange. Current and former employees indicate that Binance’s investigations team collaborates closely with Chinese law enforcement. This partnership aims to identify potential criminal activities among the 900,000+ active users in China, underscoring Binance’s efforts to maintain oversight.However, Binance now faces regulatory challenges tied to its secretive global operations. In June, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Binance and its Founder, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), alleging illegal operations and misuse of customer funds.Meanwhile, the Justice Department is conducting its own investigation. A report by Semafor on Wednesday suggests that authorities are considering fraud charges but they’re concerned that such an eventuality may lead to a run on the exchange. This regulatory onslaught has seen Binance’s market share among US users plummet, leading to a reduction of over 1,000 jobs out of its 8,000-strong workforce.Circumventing regulationThe clandestine existence of Binance’s footprint in China offers insights into the exchange’s ability to function surreptitiously in unwelcoming environments. To circumvent restrictions, Binance directed Chinese users to visit local websites with domain names before rerouting them to the global exchange. This tactic allowed Binance to keep a foothold in China, even after the government blocked direct access to its website in 2017.China’s central bank, responsible for imposing the crypto ban, remained silent when questioned about these developments. Binance’s official stance is that its website is blocked in China and inaccessible to users there.Holding on to its China-based users is crucial for Binance as it navigates a treacherous regulatory landscape that threatens its future. The company’s history with China is intricate. CZ established the firm in Shanghai in 2017, only for the government to initiate a series of regulatory attacks on crypto exchanges soon after. This led to concerns about money being illicitly moved out of the country, and Zhao eventually relocated Binance’s operations to Japan.Despite this move, Binance retained a significant workforce in China, a decision that raised concerns among its US arm regarding data control. Binance’s Chinese heritage also attracted attention, with Zhao addressing the company’s challenge of being labeled both a “criminal entity” in China and a “Chinese company” in the West.Binance’s relationship with China remains complex. As the exchange navigates these murky waters, its ability to operate under the radar and maintain its foothold in markets like China will undoubtedly play a significant role in determining its future trajectory.

news
Loading