AsiaNext Secures Market Operator License from Singapore’s MAS

Hong Kong and Israel Collaborate to Expand CBDC Access Beyond BanksIn a collaborative effort, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the Bank of Israel (BoI), and the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub have jointly released a comprehensive report on Project Sela, a central bank digital currency (CBDC) initiative.Photo by POURIA 🦋 on UnsplashBroadening the role of intermediariesThe report was published to the BIS website on Tuesday. In keeping with the trend of many CBDC projects, Project Sela is characterized by a robust public-private partnership. However, its particular focus lies in broadening the spectrum of intermediaries, aiming to offer retail CBDC services through a more diverse array of service providers, thereby reducing dependency on traditional banks and major payment providers.Andrew Abir, Deputy Governor of the Bank of Israel, emphasized the importance of fostering a dynamic and open ecosystem with a wide variety of service providers. He stated:“Competition and innovation require a flourishing and open ecosystem with many different types of service providers. This was our initial goal in Project Sela as a proof-of-concept, and the project proved the feasibility of the model we had in mind.”Involving retail banksIn a previous model explored through Hong Kong’s Project Aurum, retail banks were entrusted with customer-facing tasks while maintaining the central bank’s operation of the wholesale ledger for the eHKD. In contrast, Project Sela introduces a novel approach where the central bank operates the retail ledger — a model akin to Israel’s digital shekel.The primary actors in Project Sela, known as Access Enablers (AEs), notably do not have control over CBDC balances, distinguishing them from conventional payment providers. Moreover, AEs are not required to maintain liquidity to support CBDC services. Their role encompasses facilitating user onboarding and CBDC access, fulfilling know-your-customer (KYC) and compliance obligations, and routing payments. The role of banks and other “funding institutions” primarily revolves around enabling the conversion of cash and deposits into CBDC.The rationale behind this approach is rooted in the emergence of technological advancements in open banking and DeFi, which have demonstrated the potential to disentangle financial services by granting users greater access to their financial data and control over their own funds.Enabling participation among the unbankedProject Sela envisions the unbanked population utilizing ATMs to convert cash into CBDC. A similar approach has recently been taken by the Chinese authorities. In the resort city of Sanya, authorities have introduced e-CNY ATMs in order to enable e-CNY access for foreign tourists.However, it is noteworthy that in many countries, the primary function of ATMs is to dispense cash rather than accept it. Consequently, the inclusion of AEs could pose challenges to traditional banking institutions, as CBDC adoption could potentially impact bank deposits.Privacy and cybersecurity considerations are implicated within Project Sela. As the central bank operates the retail ledger, ensuring the confidentiality of personal information becomes imperative. To safeguard privacy, AEs employ a hashing mechanism to obfuscate personal identifiers, although the report does not delve into the subject in detail.While Bank of Israel Governor Amir Yaron admitted that a CBDC can never be anonymous, he claimed that “if we choose to issue a digital cash shekel, it will provide at least as much privacy as other digital means of payment.”

Crypto licensing developments in Singapore over the course of 2024, allied with feedback from industry insiders, suggest that the city-state has furthered its development as a crypto industry hub in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region.Photo by Mike Enerio on UnsplashDoubling up on licensing issuanceAccording to a report published by Lianhe Zaobao, a Chinese language newspaper in Singapore, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), had issued twice the number of Major Payment Institution (MPI) licenses in 2024 by comparison with the previous year. Four licenses were issued in 2023 to Crypto.com, Coinbase, Ripple and Blockchain.com. That compares with 13 licenses issued in 2024 to companies such as GSR, BitGo, Anchorage, Upbit and OKX. This uptick in licensing signals a regulatory regime that is innovation-friendly, resulting in Singapore becoming a key destination for startup companies in the crypto and Web3 space. Risk-adjusted regulatory approachAccording to William Croisettier, chief growth officer at ZKCandy, Singapore is primed to continue its development as a leading crypto hub for Web3 businesses within the APAC region. ZKCandy is a gaming-focused hyperchain within the zkSync ecosystem that has developed due to a collaboration between the Ethereum layer-2 zkSync network and Southeast Asia’s largest gaming developer, iCandy. Croisettier spoke to Cointelegraph on the matter recently, stating: “The country adopts a risk-adjusted approach to crypto regulation, focusing on the biggest digital currencies to protect investors. Singapore also makes it easy for new crypto firms to interact with local banking partners, a provision considered a luxury in other parts of the world.” Mouloukou Sanoh, co-founder and CEO of Dubai-based Mansa Finance, a DeFi platform that provides liquidity to cross-border payment companies, has also spoken positively about Singapore’s status within the crypto sector. Sanoh stated: “With its clear regulations and support for innovation, Singapore attracts top companies and talent, fostering a thriving ecosystem. This proactive approach signals a strong commitment to digital finance, contrasting with Hong Kong's more cautious stance.” Positive study findingsThese views correlate with a recent study carried out by ApeX Protocol, a multi-chain liquidity platform. The study applied a ranking to ten jurisdictions based on factors such as jobs created in the blockchain field, the number of crypto exchanges located within a jurisdiction and the number of blockchain-related patents filed. On that basis, it found that Singapore topped the rankings, ahead of Hong Kong in second place. Singapore was found to have 81 crypto exchanges located within the city-state, over 1,600 blockchain-related patents filed and 2,433 crypto-sector jobs created. A recent survey conducted by CoinDesk found that from a crypto adoption perspective, Thailand, followed by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and India, lead the APAC region. Of the 10 countries surveyed, Singapore weighed in in seventh place with a 23% adoption rate, just one percentage point behind Hong Kong with 24%. As Hong Kong and Singapore compete to attract crypto-related business, both still have room for improvement when it comes to the crypto adoption metric in comparison with other Asian countries. 

In a move to enhance the oversight of cross-border wire transfers involving virtual assets, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the central bank of the Philippines, is fortifying the implementation of regulations relative to crypto transfers.Photo by C Bueza on UnsplashTravel rule clarificationsLocal news outlet, the English language newspaper The Philippine Star reported that central bank memorandum 2023-042 provides clarifications on the travel rule for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). The travel rule requires financial institutions to pass on information to the next institution where a transaction takes place. The BSP aims to bring greater clarity to several aspects, including the applicability of the P50,000 transaction threshold and expectations regarding transactions involving jurisdictions without travel rules. Additionally, further interpretation is being provided concerning the extension of the Philippine travel rule to non-custodial VASPs and regulatory expectations surrounding transactions with unhosted wallets or crypto wallets controlled directly by their owners, rather than managed by third-party service providers. FATF compliance ambitionThis regulatory move is in response to the directives from the Paris-based Financial Action Task Force (FATF). In 2021 the Philippines came under greater scrutiny from the intergovernmental organization, when it was included on its "gray list," making it a candidate for increased monitoring. The FATF has called upon the Philippines to establish guidelines for the travel rule to prevent terrorists and criminals from exploiting virtual asset transfers for the unrestricted movement of their assets and to detect and prevent misuse effectively.BSP-supervised financial institutions (BSFIs) are now mandated to scrutinize specific details of virtual asset transfers, including the originator's name, account number used in the transaction, originator's physical address or national identity and the beneficiary's name and account number. International moves towards complianceThis latest move by the Philippine central bank is not unusual. In recent months, a plethora of similarly motivated central banks around the world have tightened up on crypto regulation as it relates to the FATF directives. Being on the FATF's "gray list" is bad for a country’s reputation. It has the potential to result in loss of investor confidence and lead to higher compliance costs and greater monitoring. Additionally, it may have an impact on trade relations and damage a country’s ability to access international finance.  Turkey has also found itself on the organization’s gray list. Working towards repairing that situation, Turkey is in the process of establishing a crypto regulatory framework that will be FATF compliant.In May, Pakistan went a step further in banning cryptocurrency. At the time, its Minister of State for Finance and Revenue, Aisha Ghaus Pasha, stated that the ban had been a requirement for Pakistan’s removal from the FATF gray list. A tightening of crypto regulations has also occurred in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and in Hong Kong more recently, as those territories work towards ensuring FATF compliance. The BSP emphasizes that transactions not surpassing the P50,000 threshold or its equivalent in foreign currency must include the names and account numbers of both the originator and beneficiary. Both originating and beneficiary VASPs are required to establish and adhere to robust sanction screening procedures, ensuring compliance with sanctions lists and preventing transactions involving sanctioned individuals, entities, or jurisdictions.