Carrieverse teams up with Internet Computer for content and marketing partnership

Dunamu likely to extend CEO Lee’s tenure, ensuring continuity in Upbit leadershipDunamu, the operator of Upbit, South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, recently convened a board meeting where a key decision was made to extend the term of Lee Sirgoo as Dunamu’s CEO, as reported by local news outlet Newsis, citing industry sources.Photo by Benjamin Child on UnsplashFinal decision on Dec 5The final decision on the extension of CEO Lee’s term at Dunamu is set to be made at the extraordinary general meeting on Dec. 5. The crypto industry is largely confident about Lee’s reappointment, especially given the presence of major executives, including Chairman Song Chi-hyung, at the recent board meeting.Responding to changing regulationsIn light of these developments, industry insiders are keenly observing whether CEO Lee will maintain Upbit’s market dominance in Korea. A key factor influencing Upbit’s future success will be Dunamu’s strategy in adapting to the changing market conditions, particularly in response to the upcoming Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which is due to come into effect in July next year.One source familiar with the matter said that Lee’s reappointment is almost assured, barring the emergence of any unexpected factors.If confirmed, this will mark Lee’s second reappointment as CEO of Dunamu since his first in 2020. This extension would bring his total tenure to nine years, continuing through 2026, considering that he initially assumed leadership in December 2017.Emphasis on stability and blockchain adoptionThis move likely underscores Dunamu’s prioritization of stability, especially considering Chairman Song’s emphasis on the company’s commitment to the widespread adoption of blockchain technology, as highlighted in the recently convened Upbit D Conference (UDC). Such a focus suggests that the company is leaning more towards maintaining its current status rather than embarking on new ventures.An executive from a Korean crypto research firm observed that Dunamu’s annual UDC event is a significant indicator of the company’s business direction. The person highlighted this by comparing it to last year’s event, where Dunamu officials focused on new initiatives, particularly in the realm of NFTs. This was evident in their collaboration with Levvels, a joint venture between Dunamu and HYBE, the management agency of the popular K-pop boy group BTS.The executive further elaborated that the widespread adoption of blockchain technology requires strengthening the Upbit business, an area in which Lee excels. The research expert suggested that if he had diverted his efforts towards other new projects outside of Upbit, the outcomes might have been different.CEO Lee’s ability to steer Upbit effectively in the burgeoning field of blockchain technology can be attributed to his rich academic and professional journey. He holds a diverse academic background with degrees from Seoul National University, the University of Hawaii at Manoa and Lewis & Clark Law School. His career spans journalism, law and corporate leadership, including roles as a reporter for JoongAng Ilbo, counsel for IBM Korea, CEO of NHN USA and co-CEO of Kakao Corporation.

South Korea is set to allow initial coin offerings (ICOs) next year, easing a ban on crypto fundraising that has been in place since 2017. A draft of the Digital Asset Basic Act, prepared by the Financial Services Commission, would allow domestic sales of digital assets if issuers meet disclosure requirements, the Maeil Business Newspaper reported. The measure is intended to address concerns about tokens that are initially listed on overseas exchanges before becoming available to South Korean investors. The legislation outlines tougher accountability standards for crypto issuers. Projects that provide false information or fail to disclose material details in their whitepapers ahead of an ICO could be held liable for investor losses. Liability would also extend to other parties substantially involved in an offering, including outsourced operators and market makers.Photo by Y K on UnsplashStablecoin issuers need Korean presenceSeparate provisions set out rules for stablecoins, barring tokens issued by entities without a physical presence in South Korea from domestic trading, a restriction that would apply to widely used stablecoins such as USDT and USDC. Issuers would be required to fully back stablecoins with reserves such as cash or government bonds held at banks or financial institutions and would be prohibited from paying interest to users. The proposal reflected the FSC’s position on the second phase of digital asset legislation focused on stablecoin issuers. The issue remains subject to inter-institutional debate, with the Bank of Korea pressing for a bank-led consortium model for stablecoin issuance. The ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) is expected to review a consolidated bill combining proposals from the government and the National Assembly next month, with plans to advance the legislation during the regular parliamentary session in the first quarter of 2026. The FSC’s focus on consumer protection is also reflected in its plans to introduce a Digital Finance Security Act, detailed in a recent report to the presidential office. According to Digital Asset, the proposed legislation would establish rules for traditional financial institutions as well as electronic financial businesses and virtual asset service providers. The move came after a 44.5 billion won ($30 million) hacking incident last month at Upbit, the country’s largest crypto exchange. Existing regulations under the Virtual Asset User Protection Act do not contain provisions specifically covering such cases. Separately, the FSC is working to strengthen its response to emerging forms of financial crime, including transnational offenses and crypto-enabled money laundering. It said measures under consideration included adding state-level criminal organizations to the list of entities barred from financial transactions, improving anti-money-laundering (AML) rules to better align with international standards, and expanding the scope of the travel rule. On the supervisory side, the commission intends to make the Virtual Asset Division a permanent unit after initially establishing it as a temporary body, News1 reported. The Virtual Asset Inspection Division within the Financial Intelligence Unit is also set to become a standing unit. Price declines weigh on exchangesThe stepped-up regulatory focus has coincided with a broader downturn in the crypto market. Bitcoin is trading below $89,000, about 30% below its all-time high of $126,000 set earlier in October. CoinGecko data cited by IT Chosun showed average daily trading volume across South Korean exchanges falling to $2.95 billion in November from $4.41 billion in August, with trading fees accounting for about 98% of exchange revenue. The broader market weakness has also been accompanied by declines in altcoins. South Korean crypto investors attributed the recent drop in altcoin prices to capital flowing into major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. A weekly survey conducted by CoinNess and Cratos showed that 41.7% of the 2,000 respondents cited capital concentration in leading tokens as the primary factor, followed by the growing number of altcoins at 31.6%, their limited practical value at 14.7%, and technical factors such as chart patterns at 12.1%. 

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto fundsRoger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash$8 million disputeThe crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocenceRoger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.Matrixport standing firmWhile Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”