Binance’s Entry Followed by Increased Scrutiny on Foreign Executives in Korean Crypto Firms

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.

Binance Takes P2P Service Measures in Response to Sanctioned Russian BanksGlobal crypto exchange Binance has removed the option for users to conduct transactions via sanctioned Russian banks on its peer-to-peer (P2P) platform, a decision that comes on the heels of a Wall Street Journal exposé published earlier this week, shedding light on the platform’s involvement in facilitating the movement of funds for Russian users.Previously, Binance’s peer-to-peer service featured five Russian banks under sanctions as a method for ruble transfers between users. However, the company swiftly acted to address potential compliance concerns. Fittingly, this latest news was also broken by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.Dmitry Sidorov on PexelsSailing too close to the windWhen approached regarding the omission of these banks, a Binance spokesperson stated: “We regularly update our systems to ensure compliance with local and global regulatory standards. When gaps are pointed out to us, we seek to address and remediate them as soon as possible.”The Wall Street Journal’s article outlined how Binance’s peer-to-peer platform facilitated ruble-to-crypto trades that frequently involved the sanctioned Russian banks, with Rosbank and Tinkoff Bank being prominent examples.These trades often utilized layers of intermediaries to convert funds from these banks into Binance balances, as detailed by various company resources, user screenshots, and messages in official chat groups. Despite these revelations, Binance’s exchange had continued to handle significant volumes of ruble trading, according to data compiled by digital asset research firm CCData.US DoJ probeBinance’s activities in Russia could potentially contribute to its ongoing legal challenges in the United States. The US Justice Department (DoJ) has been probing the company’s actions for potential violations of American sanctions on Russia. In response to such concerns, the Binance spokesperson emphasized:“Binance aims to diligently comply with the global sanctions rules and enforces sanctions on people, organizations, entities, and countries that have been blacklisted by the international community, denying such actors access to the Binance platform.”WorkaroundsTraders, however, had reportedly found workarounds to the bank removals, as observed in the official Telegram chat group for Russian clients. Many shared that they could still engage with sanctioned banks by selecting alternative payment methods and then manually inputting their Rosbank or Tinkoff bank details.Earlier this year, an investigative report by CNBC alleged that employees of the company had told it that Binance staff regularly helped Chinese customers to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) controls in order to access the platform. More recently, another report, once again by the Wall Street Journal, found that business in China was booming, which surprised many given that China banned crypto trading within the country in 2021.It’s apparent that the company is reacting to regulatory and legal pressures in taking the decision to make these changes to its P2P service. Perennial crypto critic US Senator Elizabeth Warren took to X (formerly Twitter) on Friday, stating:“I rang the alarm about sanctions evasion by Russia using the crypto platform Binance — and urged [the DoJ] to investigate potentially false statements it made to Congress. We need stronger crypto regulations to rein in illicit finance.“

On Wednesday, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) in Hong Kong launched investigations at six premises controlled by Worldcoin, the biometric cryptocurrency project established by Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI. Potential personal data privacy risksIn a statement, the Privacy Commissioner expressed serious concerns about potential risks to personal data privacy. The PCPD executed warrants as part of the inquiry into Worldcoin's identity verification project, particularly focusing on the use of iris-scanning orbs for identity verification. The PCPD urged Hong Kong residents to consider the implications of Worldcoin's biometric data collection and emphasized the importance of evaluating the legitimacy of such data collection. The Commission also advised individuals to inquire about the purpose of data collection, the intended use of the data, the classes of entities with access to the data, the retention period of biometric data and the safety measures implemented to protect sensitive information. "The PCPD is concerned that the operation of Worldcoin in Hong Kong involves serious risks to personal data privacy, and believes that the collection and processing of sensitive personal data by the relevant organization may be in contravention of the requirements of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance," stated the privacy watchdog. The Commission highlighted that any personal data controlled by Worldcoin must be collected for a lawful purpose related to the project's function or activity, with the information collected from users' irises deemed sensitive according to regulatory guidelines.Photo by Harpreet Singh on UnsplashGlobal scrutinyWorldcoin, which commenced operations in 2021 and officially launched in July 2023, has faced regulatory scrutiny in various countries due to privacy concerns. As of December 2023, Worldcoin reported that over 5 million people had created accounts using their identities. However, the project's approach to identity verification through iris scanning has triggered investigations and actions by regulators. Notably, the project suspended services in Kenya and halted iris scans in India in response to regulatory challenges.  The company’s activities in the French and Brazilian markets have been suspended. Last year the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office said that it would make further enquiries into the company’s activities. Meanwhile, the German data watchdog has been investigating Worldcoin since 2022. In an effort to clarify the efforts the company is making to achieve compliance across international jurisdictions where data privacy is concerned, Worldcoin recently published a blog post on the subject. Within it, the company states that it “is designed to be fully compliant with all laws and regulations governing data collection and data transfer." Despite its ongoing regulatory challenges, Worldcoin CEO Alex Blania remains steadfast in advancing the project's mission, stating recently:"We race toward billions of users as fast as we possibly can."  The project closed out 2023 by expanding into Singapore. The privacy concerns surrounding Worldcoin underscore the growing importance of balancing technological innovation with robust data privacy regulations to ensure the protection of individuals' sensitive information.