Woori Bank Joins Forces with Samsung Securities and SK Securities to Pioneer Security Token Market

Korean Gov’t Encourages Discussions on Tax Imposition within the MetaverseThe South Korean government is planning to hold an open forum in August, encouraging citizens to discuss the possibility of imposing taxes within the metaverse, according to News1.New social frameworkOn Tuesday, Korea’s Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) announced the government’s plan to develop a new social framework in the digital age. To achieve this, the government will set up an open digital forum and draft a digital bill of rights.Topics to be covered in the forum include generative artificial intelligence, the metaverse, and self-driving cars.Regulation-free metaversesThe idea of imposing taxes within the metaverse has piqued the interest of cryptocurrency users. The government has reportedly decided to exempt community-based metaverses from regulations to encourage growth. This policy will enable metaverse users to provide gaming content and engage in economic activities such as trading items and distributing giveaways. However, the potential surge in economic activities in the metaverse has brought up the issue of whether tax implementation is necessary in this virtual world.Though community-based metaverses are still premature, the government acknowledges the importance of discussing potential tax imposition.While the current agenda is focused on metaverses, it remains unclear whether discussions will extend to loosening regulations for blockchain-based games.Strict gaming restrictionsCurrently, Korean law prohibits trading game items for cash to deter gambling behavior, prompting Korean game developers to publish their titles overseas first. In fact, Netmarble launched blockchain-based mobile board game Meta World: My City in regions other than Korea last month. This has led to concerns that Korea is falling behind in the global gaming industry due to strict regulations.Digital bill of rightsFollowing the open forum in August, MSIT will collaborate with other relevant government agencies, including the Culture Ministry and the Land Ministry, to draft a digital bill of rights in September.MSIT Minister Lee Jong-ho said that the government will conduct regular surveys to identify areas for improvement, assess the societal impact of technological advancements, monitor each ministry’s measures, and review public opinions.© Pexels/Nataliya Vaitkevich

WOO Network Repurchases Shares in 3AC SettlementWOO Network, a Taiwan-based liquidity provider, has reached a settlement with Teneo, the liquidator of bankrupt Singapore hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC).The settlement involves the repurchase of shares and tokens acquired by 3AC during WOO’s Series A fundraising round in November 2021. This resolution brings finality to 3AC's contentious involvement with the Taiwanese firm.Photo by Joss Woodhead on UnsplashClosing out 3AC involvementOn Wednesday WOO announced the share and token repurchase via a blog post published to its website, signaling the resolution of its dealings with Three Arrows Capital and, consequently, bringing an end to the uncertainties that had enveloped their partnership.In addition to this, a total of 20 million WOO tokens, valued at over $3 million, were repurchased and sent to a burn address to ensure they couldn’t be accessed by anyone. 3AC had not only acquired equity but also 25 million WOO tokens, with the remaining set to vest over the next 12 months.Jack Tan, Co-Founder of WOO Network, emphasized the significance of resolving the 3AC-related issues. Tan commended the proactive collaboration with liquidators to secure a fair agreement for repurchasing their shares, along with vested and vesting tokens, from 3AC’s estate. Tan also welcomed the opportunity to move on from the 3AC entanglement, stating:“The past 18 months have seen a concentration of bad news hit our industry from large-scale failures to more overzealous regulators. A thorough cleansing of the system has taken place and we are looking forward to rebuilding with our partners and team.”Equally WOO Network community members are happy with the outcome, with one stating on X (formerly Twitter): “This is a huge win for the project and its community.”By repurchasing these shares and tokens, WOO Network has effectively severed its ties with 3AC and its creditors, paving the way for a more focused growth trajectory in the upcoming year. Jack Tan observed that the cryptocurrency industry has faced an influx of adverse developments in recent times, including significant failures and heightened regulatory scrutiny. He emphasized that a comprehensive restructuring of the system has occurred and expressed optimism about the future, looking forward to rebuilding alongside their partners and team.In light of these recent developments, WOO Network is poised to move forward with renewed vigor, leaving behind the tumultuous period of the 3AC fallout. This strategic resolution not only ensures a fair and equitable outcome for shareholders but also heralds a promising future for WOO Network in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency.According to data from CoinGecko at the time of publication, the WOO Network token price experienced an increase of 1.45% over the past 24 hours, settling at $0.1709, with its trading volume increasing by 2.8% to $8.79 million. However, over the past 30 days, the crypto token has recorded gains of nearly 10.8%, indicating resilience and a positive outlook as it navigates the evolving landscape of the digital asset market.This development, along with the cryptocurrency’s recent performance, underscores the potential for growth and renewed promise within the WOO Network ecosystem. More clarity has been brought to the future of the business as a consequence of bringing finality to this contentious issue.

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.