NFT Artists Coming to Seoul in September for The Gateway: Korea

Bitstamp Raises Funds to Enable Asian Market ExpansionBitstamp, one of the world’s oldest cryptocurrency exchanges, is embarking on an ambitious endeavor to expand its services within the Asian market through a fresh funding round.Bloomberg reported on Monday that the firm’s CEO Jean-Baptiste Graftieaux, stated that “our current and exclusive priority is to raise money through strategic investors to accelerate Bitstamp’s growth by providing new products and services to retail and institutional crypto customers.”Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashDerivatives trading and Asian expansionIn accomplishing the funding round, the company is being guided by Mike Novogratz of Galaxy Digital Holdings. Bitstamp initiated its fundraising efforts in late June. The objective behind these efforts is to secure the capital required for launching derivatives trading in Europe by 2024 and to extend the platform’s reach across various markets in Asia. Moreover, Bitstamp has its sights set on fortifying its presence in the United Kingdom, seeking to establish a more robust footing there.Bitstamp’s current endeavors to amplify its operational scale are aligned with the company’s broader ambitions announced in 2018. This was the year when the firm was acquired by NXMH, a South Korean-backed entity.Not for saleBack then, Nejc Kodrič, one of Bitstamp’s co-founders, asserted that the intention was not to sell the company or actively seek investment. Nevertheless, the acquisition was realized, and Kodrič opted to cash out a majority of his Bitstamp stock while retaining a 10% stake and continuing as the CEO.Graftieaux was emphatic in clarifying Bitstamp’s intentions, stating that the company is not actively seeking to be acquired or to sell itself. This news arrives just a few months after Ripple acquired a minority stake in Bitstamp during the first quarter of 2023. Galaxy Digital played an instrumental role as an adviser throughout that transaction, which was publicly disclosed in late May.Coinciding with this news, Bitstamp has unveiled some trading restrictions for its US user base. Effective from August 29, the exchange will temporarily halt trading for tokens such as Axie Infinity (AXS), Chiliz (CHZ), Decentraland (MANA), Polygon (MATIC), NEAR Protocol (NEAR), The Sandbox (SAND), and Solana (SOL).This pause in trading activities has been attributed to “recent market developments,” with assurances that the ability to hold and withdraw these tokens will remain unaffected. All of the projects behind the tokens that Bitstamp is planning to halt the trading of have been named by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as unregistered securities in its lawsuit against Coinbase.Slovenian rootsHaving originated in Slovenia in 2011, Bitstamp gradually evolved into a prominent force in the cryptocurrency trading landscape. Once an alternative to the then-dominant Bitcoin exchange, Mt. Gox, Bitstamp’s reach and influence have grown substantially. It currently stands as one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges, boasting a trading volume of approximately $127 million over a recent 24-hour period, according to data published by crypto data aggregator CoinGecko.The developments at Bitstamp demonstrate that the firm continues to refine its global strategy, extending its services and product offerings to various markets globally.

Hong Kong to Issue Digital Asset Licensing Guidelines in MayAccording to Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), the Commission will issue new guidelines for virtual asset exchanges within the Chinese autonomous special administrative region (SAR).© Pexels/Jimmy ChanSFC CEO Julia Leung made that announcement while speaking at an event in the city on Thursday, indicating that the guidelines are due to be released next month. Additionally the autonomous region intends to introduce a new licensing system from June 1 onwards, enabling the retail investors among Hong Kong’s populace to trade leading cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Hong Kong authorities had provided an insight into this approach back in February, when plans to provide retail access to digital assets were first set out. At the time, they outlined the need for retail customers to pass a knowledge test relative to digital assets or otherwise only being allowed to trade such assets once the customer had completed a certain level of training relative to digital assets, provided by a regulated crypto service provider.This latest announcement has arrived amid a backdrop of a series of recent indications that signify the intent of authorities in Hong Kong to make the autonomous region a major financial hub centered around digital assets.Leung articulated that the further development of this digital assets framework follows a consultation process that attracted more than 150 responses. Although virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will need to await the complete rollout of the licensing system, a handful of crypto businesses such as OSL and Hashkey, under the supervision of the Hong Kong regulator, have already started to offer their services.Crypto as propertyA Hong Kong court recently recognized cryptocurrency as property. The ruling emerged in a bankruptcy hearing pertaining to failed cryptocurrency exchange Gatecoin. In presiding over the case, Justice Linda Chan outlined that the autonomous region takes a broad view of what constitutes property. In finding crypto to meet the definition of property, she went on to clarify that it therefore has the capability of being held in trust.The finding has particular relevance in the crypto world right now given the consequences of an “in trust” custodianship of customer’s digital assets relative to numerous ongoing bankruptcy processes involving failed crypto businesses, and the pecking order of creditors in those instances, in their efforts to recover their digital assets.Positive approachWhile mainland China remains an adverse territory relative to digital assets, Hong Kong has taken to welcoming the sector and with that, enticing crypto firms to relocate to the autonomous region from the mainland. Leadership in the city has been making all the right soundings to demonstrate that it is actively trying to nurture the nascent sector.While recent months have seen the Biden administration in the United States attempt to close off banking from the crypto sector, in contrast, Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, ZA Bank, was recently given permission to act as a settlement bank for regulated Web3 businesses located within Hong Kong.

During a National Policy Committee audit, South Korean lawmakers pressed financial regulators on their oversight of the domestic crypto market, focusing on Binance’s acquisition of local exchange Gopax, risks from order-book sharing with foreign platforms, and weaknesses in anti–money laundering (AML) controls.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashQuestions over Gopax compensationAccording to Kuki News, Democratic Party lawmaker Min Byeong-dug has urged regulators to reach out to Binance for details on its plan to compensate Gopax creditors following its acquisition of the local exchange. One of the nation’s five fiat-to-crypto exchanges, Gopax suspended withdrawals from its GoFi service, a yield-bearing product, in November 2022 after the collapse of the Bahamas-based FTX crypto exchange and the bankruptcy of Genesis, a U.S.-based crypto financial services firm. Citing investor losses estimated at 10 billion to 50 billion won (about $7 million–$35 million), Min said Binance had agreed to cover the shortfall as part of its cashless acquisition of Gopax, but full repayment to Korean users remains unresolved. He noted that the deal had faced delays due to concerns raised by the Financial Services Commission’s (FSC) Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) over Binance’s eligibility as a major shareholder, and urged the FSC and FIU to ensure a clear and timely resolution for affected investors. Concerns over order-book sharingPeople Power Party (PPP) lawmaker Lee Heon-seung raised additional concerns about order-book sharing tied to the Binance–Gopax deal, warning it could create regulatory blind spots. According to Dailian, he asked the FIU about risks such as possible gaps in AML oversight at foreign exchanges and the potential exposure of Korean user data. FIU head Park Gwang said inadequate AML systems at overseas platforms can hinder fund tracing. He noted that separate approval is required before a domestic exchange can share its order book with a foreign platform, adding that no such request was under discussion. Park said the FIU would closely examine the matter and ensure protection of personal data. Lee also questioned how effectively regulators can supervise the crypto market given its scale, pointing to the Bithumb exchange as an example, where he had raised similar concerns about order-book sharing. Bithumb serves about 3.8 million users and records roughly 605 trillion won (approximately $426 billion) in annual trading volume. He said order-book sharing with major global exchanges such as Binance could complicate AML compliance, data protection, and regulatory oversight, and called for stronger enforcement. In response, Park said that the agency would ensure proper supervision to address these risks. Allegations of AML loopholes and illicit useAnother PPP lawmaker, Kim Jae-sub, flagged a potential AML loophole involving Binance, saying the exchange had allegedly been used by Cambodia’s Prince Group, which is linked to fraudulent schemes to conceal illicit funds. Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a civil forfeiture complaint to seize roughly 127,271 Bitcoin linked to Prince Group’s operations, marking the largest seizure in its history. Kim also cited past allegations connecting Binance to illicit transactions involving Hamas and North Korea, and said the exchange’s founder faces related charges. He urged the FSC to conduct a thorough examination to determine the extent of any involvement if the claims prove accurate. As the parliamentary audit continues, lawmakers from both parties are pressing regulators to clarify standards, tighten oversight, and prioritize investor protection while maintaining fair and predictable rules for market participants.